Standardizing Intelligence: Aligning Generative AI for Regulatory and Operational Compliance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04736v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 16:55:01 GMT
• Title: Standardizing Intelligence: Aligning Generative AI for Regulatory and Operational Compliance
• Authors: Joseph Marvin Imperial, Matthew D. Jones, Harish Tayyar Madabushi,
• Abstract summary: We assess the criticality levels of different standards across domains and sectors and complement them by grading the current compliance capabilities of state-of-the-art GenAI models.<n>Overall, we argue that aligning GenAI with standards through computational methods can help strengthen regulatory and operational compliance.
• Score: 3.666326242924816
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Technical standards, or simply standards, are established documented guidelines and rules that facilitate the interoperability, quality, and accuracy of systems and processes. In recent years, we have witnessed an emerging paradigm shift where the adoption of generative AI (GenAI) models has increased tremendously, spreading implementation interests across standard-driven industries, including engineering, legal, healthcare, and education. In this paper, we assess the criticality levels of different standards across domains and sectors and complement them by grading the current compliance capabilities of state-of-the-art GenAI models. To support the discussion, we outline possible challenges and opportunities with integrating GenAI for standard compliance tasks while also providing actionable recommendations for entities involved with developing and using standards. Overall, we argue that aligning GenAI with standards through computational methods can help strengthen regulatory and operational compliance. We anticipate this area of research will play a central role in the management, oversight, and trustworthiness of larger, more powerful GenAI-based systems in the near future.

Related papers

• Approaches to Responsible Governance of GenAI in Organizations [0.1747623282473278]
  This paper draws on literature, established governance frameworks, and industry roundtable discussions to identify core principles for integrating responsible GenAI governance into diverse organizational structures. Findings emphasize the need for adaptable risk assessment tools, continuous monitoring practices, and cross-sector collaboration to establish trustworthy GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T18:43:29Z)
• On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective [314.7991906491166]
  Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools.<n>Their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive framework to address these challenges through three key contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T06:20:36Z)
• GenAIOps for GenAI Model-Agility [2.7396907658239424]
  We discuss so-called GenAI Model-agility, which we define as the readiness to be flexibly adapted to base foundation models as diverse as the model providers and versions. First, for handling issues specific to generative AI, we first define a methodology of GenAI application development and operations, as GenAIOps, to identify the problem of application quality degradation caused by changes to the underlying foundation models. We study prompt tuning technologies, which look promising to address this problem, and discuss their effectiveness and limitations through case studies using existing tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T03:29:03Z)
• An Open Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Concepts and Requirements between the EU AI Act and International Standards [1.9142148274342772]
  The EU's AI Act will shift the focus of such organizations toward conformance with the technical requirements for regulatory compliance. This paper offers a simple and repeatable mechanism for mapping the terms and requirements relevant to normative statements in regulations and standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:21:09Z)
• Model-based Maintenance and Evolution with GenAI: A Look into the Future [47.93555901495955]
  We argue that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can be used as a means to address the limitations of Model-Based Engineering (MBM&E) We propose that GenAI can be used in MBM&E for: reducing engineers' learning curve, maximizing efficiency with recommendations, or serving as a reasoning tool to understand domain problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T23:13:26Z)
• Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
  Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z)
• Generative AI and Process Systems Engineering: The Next Frontier [0.5937280131734116]
  This article explores how emerging generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models, such as large language models (LLMs), can enhance solution methodologies within process systems engineering (PSE) These cutting-edge GenAI models, particularly foundation models (FMs), are pre-trained on extensive, general-purpose datasets. The article identifies and discusses potential challenges in fully leveraging GenAI within PSE, including multiscale modeling, data requirements, evaluation metrics and benchmarks, and trust and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T18:20:42Z)
• Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies [1.2818275315985972]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has swiftly entered organizations without adequate governance.<n>Despite extensive debates on GenAI's transformative nature and regulatory measures, limited research addresses organizational governance.<n>Our review paper fills this gap by surveying recent works with the purpose of better understanding fundamental characteristics of GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T14:20:19Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI [64.59151650272477]
  We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T17:44:58Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.