Understanding the Limits of Lifelong Knowledge Editing in LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05683v1
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 18:45:42 GMT
- Title: Understanding the Limits of Lifelong Knowledge Editing in LLMs
- Authors: Lukas Thede, Karsten Roth, Matthias Bethge, Zeynep Akata, Tom Hartvigsen,
- Abstract summary: We bridge research into lifelong knowledge editing to real-world edits at practically relevant scale.<n>We first introduce WikiBigEdit; a large-scale benchmark of real-world Wikidata edits.<n>In its first instance, it includes over 500K question-answer pairs for knowledge editing.
- Score: 59.12302872055081
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Keeping large language models factually up-to-date is crucial for deployment, yet costly retraining remains a challenge. Knowledge editing offers a promising alternative, but methods are only tested on small-scale or synthetic edit benchmarks. In this work, we aim to bridge research into lifelong knowledge editing to real-world edits at practically relevant scale. We first introduce WikiBigEdit; a large-scale benchmark of real-world Wikidata edits, built to automatically extend lifelong for future-proof benchmarking. In its first instance, it includes over 500K question-answer pairs for knowledge editing alongside a comprehensive evaluation pipeline. Finally, we use WikiBigEdit to study existing knowledge editing techniques' ability to incorporate large volumes of real-world facts and contrast their capabilities to generic modification techniques such as retrieval augmentation and continual finetuning to acquire a complete picture of the practical extent of current lifelong knowledge editing.
Related papers
- K-Edit: Language Model Editing with Contextual Knowledge Awareness [71.73747181407323]
Knowledge-based model editing enables precise modifications to the weights of large language models.<n>We present K-Edit, an effective approach to generating contextually consistent knowledge edits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-15T01:35:13Z) - AnyEdit: Edit Any Knowledge Encoded in Language Models [69.30638272162267]
We propose AnyEdit, a new autoregressive editing paradigm for large language models (LLMs)<n>It decomposes long-form knowledge into sequential chunks and iteratively edits the key token in each chunk, ensuring consistent and accurate outputs.<n>It outperforms strong baselines by 21.5% on benchmarks including UnKEBench, AKEW, and our new EditEverything dataset for long-form diverse-formatted knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T16:18:37Z) - Related Knowledge Perturbation Matters: Rethinking Multiple Pieces of Knowledge Editing in Same-Subject [49.559994791305535]
Current state-of-the-art editing methods struggle when tasked with editing multiple related knowledge pieces for the same subject.
We introduce the $textS2textRKE$(Same-Subject Related Knowledge Editing) benchmark.
Our experiments reveal that only mainstream locate-then-edit methods, such as ROME and MEMIT, exhibit "related knowledge perturbation"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T04:47:17Z) - O-Edit: Orthogonal Subspace Editing for Language Model Sequential Editing [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) acquire knowledge during pre-training, but over time, this knowledge may become incorrect or outdated, necessitating updates after training.
We propose Orthogonal Subspace Editing, O-Edit. This algorithmizes the direction of each knowledge update, minimizing interference between successive updates and reducing the impact of new updates on unrelated knowledge.
It can perform thousands of edits on mainstream LLMs, achieving an average performance improvement that is 4.2 times better than existing methods while effectively preserving the model's performance on downstream tasks, all with minimal additional parameter overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T10:16:45Z) - Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models [26.516571783335824]
Recent studies have identified side effects, such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities, that have emerged after editing.
This survey presents a comprehensive study of these side effects, providing a unified perspective on the challenges of knowledge editing in large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-03T15:28:21Z) - Editing Conceptual Knowledge for Large Language Models [65.38231526537476]
This paper pioneers the investigation of editing conceptual knowledge for Large Language Models (LLMs)
We construct a novel benchmark dataset ConceptEdit and establish a suite of new metrics for evaluation.
experimental results reveal that, although existing editing methods can efficiently modify concept-level definition to some extent, they also have the potential to distort the related instantial knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-10T16:57:10Z) - AKEW: Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wild [79.96813982502952]
AKEW (Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wild) is a new practical benchmark for knowledge editing.
It fully covers three editing settings of knowledge updates: structured facts, unstructured texts as facts, and extracted triplets.
Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the considerable gap between state-of-the-art knowledge-editing methods and practical scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T07:08:34Z) - EasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Models [45.70959260613425]
We propose EasyEdit, an easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for Large Language Models.
It supports various cutting-edge knowledge editing approaches and can be readily applied to many well-known LLMs.
We report the knowledge editing results on LlaMA-2 with EasyEdit, demonstrating that knowledge editing surpasses traditional fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T16:52:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.