Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Classroom Learning Experience

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05709v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:15:37 GMT
• Title: Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Classroom Learning Experience
• Authors: Shadeeb Hossain,
• Abstract summary: The focus is on improving students learning experiences by using Machine Learning algorithms.<n>A Logistic Regression algorithm is applied for binary classification using six predictor variables, such as assessment scores, lesson duration, and preferred learning style.<n>A case study, with 76,519 candidates and 35 predictor variables, assesses academic dropout risk using Logistic Regression, achieving a test accuracy of 87.39%.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper explores advancements in Artificial Intelligence technologies to enhance classroom learning, highlighting contributions from companies like IBM, Microsoft, Google, and ChatGPT, as well as the potential of brain signal analysis. The focus is on improving students learning experiences by using Machine Learning algorithms to : identify a student preferred learning style and predict academic dropout risk. A Logistic Regression algorithm is applied for binary classification using six predictor variables, such as assessment scores, lesson duration, and preferred learning style, to accurately identify learning preferences. A case study, with 76,519 candidates and 35 predictor variables, assesses academic dropout risk using Logistic Regression, achieving a test accuracy of 87.39%. In comparison, the Stochastic Gradient Descent classifier achieved an accuracy of 83.1% on the same dataset.

Related papers

• AI-Driven Personalized Learning: Predicting Academic Per-formance Through Leadership Personality Traits [0.0]
  The study explores the potential of AI technologies in personalized learning.<n>It suggests the prediction of academic success through leadership personality traits and machine learning modelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T18:47:30Z)
• Predicting ChatGPT Use in Assignments: Implications for AI-Aware Assessment Design [0.0]
  The study reveals that frequent use of ChatGPT for learning new concepts correlates with potential overreliance.<n>We propose discipline-specific guidelines and reimagined assessment strategies to balance innovation with academic rigor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T11:09:38Z)
• ReLearn: Unlearning via Learning for Large Language Models [64.2802606302194]
  We propose ReLearn, a data augmentation and fine-tuning pipeline for effective unlearning. This framework introduces Knowledge Forgetting Rate (KFR) and Knowledge Retention Rate (KRR) to measure knowledge-level preservation. Our experiments show that ReLearn successfully achieves targeted forgetting while preserving high-quality output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:31:00Z)
• XAL: EXplainable Active Learning Makes Classifiers Better Low-resource Learners [71.8257151788923]
  We propose a novel Explainable Active Learning framework (XAL) for low-resource text classification.<n>XAL encourages classifiers to justify their inferences and delve into unlabeled data for which they cannot provide reasonable explanations.<n>Experiments on six datasets show that XAL achieves consistent improvement over 9 strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T08:07:04Z)
• A Predictive Model using Machine Learning Algorithm in Identifying Students Probability on Passing Semestral Course [0.0]
  This study employs classification for data mining techniques, and decision tree for algorithm. With the utilization of the newly discovered predictive model, the prediction of students probabilities to pass the current courses they take gives 0.7619 accuracy, 0.8333 precision, 0.8823 recall, and 0.8571 f1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T01:57:08Z)
• ASPEST: Bridging the Gap Between Active Learning and Selective Prediction [56.001808843574395]
  Selective prediction aims to learn a reliable model that abstains from making predictions when uncertain. Active learning aims to lower the overall labeling effort, and hence human dependence, by querying the most informative examples. In this work, we introduce a new learning paradigm, active selective prediction, which aims to query more informative samples from the shifted target domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T23:51:07Z)
• Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Students Academic Performance and Study Strategies based on their Motivation [0.0]
  This research aims to develop machine learning models for students academic performance and study strategies prediction. Key learning attributes (intrinsic, extrinsic, autonomy, relatedness, competence, and self-esteem) essential for students learning process were used in building the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T04:09:05Z)
• Towards Diverse Evaluation of Class Incremental Learning: A Representation Learning Perspective [67.45111837188685]
  Class incremental learning (CIL) algorithms aim to continually learn new object classes from incrementally arriving data. We experimentally analyze neural network models trained by CIL algorithms using various evaluation protocols in representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T11:44:11Z)
• Can Active Learning Preemptively Mitigate Fairness Issues? [66.84854430781097]
  dataset bias is one of the prevailing causes of unfairness in machine learning. We study whether models trained with uncertainty-based ALs are fairer in their decisions with respect to a protected class. We also explore the interaction of algorithmic fairness methods such as gradient reversal (GRAD) and BALD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T14:20:22Z)
• Low-Regret Active learning [64.36270166907788]
  We develop an online learning algorithm for identifying unlabeled data points that are most informative for training. At the core of our work is an efficient algorithm for sleeping experts that is tailored to achieve low regret on predictable (easy) instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T22:53:45Z)
• Investigating the Robustness of Artificial Intelligent Algorithms with Mixture Experiments [1.877815076482061]
  robustness of AI algorithms is of great interest as inaccurate prediction could result in safety concerns and limit the adoption of AI systems. A robust classification algorithm is expected to have high accuracy and low variability under different application scenarios. We conduct a comprehensive set of mixture experiments to collect prediction performance results. Then statistical analyses are conducted to understand how various factors affect the robustness of AI classification algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-10T15:38:53Z)
• A framework for predicting, interpreting, and improving Learning Outcomes [0.0]
  We develop an Embibe Score Quotient model (ESQ) to predict test scores based on observed academic, behavioral and test-taking features of a student. ESQ can be used to predict the future scoring potential of a student as well as offer personalized learning nudges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T11:22:27Z)
• On the Robustness of Active Learning [0.7340017786387767]
  Active Learning is concerned with how to identify the most useful samples for a Machine Learning algorithm to be trained with. We find that it is often applied with not enough care and domain knowledge. We propose the new "Sum of Squared Logits" method based on the Simpson diversity index and investigate the effect of using the confusion matrix for balancing in sample selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T09:07:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.