XIFBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Multilingual Instruction Following

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07539v2
• Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 09:40:03 GMT
• Title: XIFBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Multilingual Instruction Following
• Authors: Zhenyu Li, Kehai Chen, Yunfei Long, Xuefeng Bai, Yaoyin Zhang, Xuchen Wei, Juntao Li, Min Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable instruction-following capabilities across various applications.<n>Existing evaluations lack fine-grained constraint analysis across diverse linguistic contexts.<n>We introduce XIFBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating multilingual instruction-following abilities of LLMs.
• Score: 59.549015333755186
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable instruction-following capabilities across various applications. However, their performance in multilingual settings lacks systematic investigation, with existing evaluations lacking fine-grained constraint analysis across diverse linguistic contexts. We introduce XIFBench, a comprehensive constraint-based benchmark for evaluating multilingual instruction-following abilities of LLMs, comprising 558 instructions with 0-5 additional constraints across five categories (Content, Style, Situation, Format, and Numerical) in six languages spanning different resource levels. To support reliable and consistent cross-lingual evaluation, we implement three methodological innovations: cultural accessibility annotation, constraint-level translation validation, and requirement-based evaluation using English requirements as semantic anchors across languages. Extensive experiments with various LLMs not only quantify performance disparities across resource levels but also provide detailed insights into how language resources, constraint categories, instruction complexity, and cultural specificity influence multilingual instruction-following. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/zhenyuli801/XIFBench.

Related papers

• M3TQA: Massively Multilingual Multitask Table Question Answering [39.99483693397598]
  m3TQA-Instruct is a large-scale benchmark spanning 97 languages across diverse language families.<n>We construct m3TQA by curating 50 real-world tables in Chinese and English, then applying a robust six-step translation pipeline powered by DeepSeek and GPT-4o.<n>The benchmark includes 2,916 professionally annotated question-answering pairs across four tasks designed to evaluate nuanced table reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T09:57:40Z)
• TASE: Token Awareness and Structured Evaluation for Multilingual Language Models [8.058965963418785]
  TASE is a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' ability to perceive and reason about token-level information.<n> TASE covers 10 tasks under two core categories: token awareness and structural understanding, spanning Chinese, English, and Korean.<n>We evaluate over 30 leading commercial and open-source LLMs, including O3, Claude 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek-R1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T15:11:17Z)
• Multilingual Self-Taught Faithfulness Evaluators [11.200203292660758]
  Self-Taught Evaluators for Multilingual Faithfulness is a framework that learns exclusively from synthetic multilingual summarization data.<n>Our framework shows improvements over existing baselines, including state-of-the-art English evaluators and machine translation-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T12:01:59Z)
• MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languages [33.450081592217074]
  We introduce MuBench, a benchmark covering 61 languages and evaluating a broad range of capabilities.<n>We evaluate several state-of-the-art multilingual LLMs and find notable gaps between claimed and actual language coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T09:53:00Z)
• PolyMath: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning in Multilingual Contexts [79.84059473102778]
  PolyMath is a multilingual mathematical reasoning benchmark covering 18 languages and 4 easy-to-hard difficulty levels. Our benchmark ensures difficulty comprehensiveness, language diversity, and high-quality translation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T15:39:04Z)
• MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation [60.52580061637301]
  MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 13 typologically diverse languages with approximately 11,829 questions per language. We evaluate 25 state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) using 5-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) and zero-shot prompting strategies, analyzing their performance across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Our experiments reveal consistent performance degradation from high-resource languages to lower-resource ones, with the best models achieving over 70% accuracy on English but dropping to around 40% for languages like Swahili.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T15:59:20Z)
• Balanced Multi-Factor In-Context Learning for Multilingual Large Language Models [53.38288894305388]
  Multilingual large language models (MLLMs) are able to leverage in-context learning (ICL) to achieve high performance by leveraging cross-lingual knowledge transfer without parameter updates.<n>Three key factors influence multilingual ICL: (1) semantic similarity, (2) linguistic alignment, and (3) language-specific performance.<n>We propose balanced multi-factor ICL (textbfBMF-ICL), a method that quantifies and optimally balances these factors for improved example selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T06:56:33Z)
• LUSIFER: Language Universal Space Integration for Enhanced Multilingual Embeddings with Large Language Models [89.13128402847943]
  We present LUSIFER, a novel zero-shot approach that adapts LLM-based embedding models for multilingual tasks without requiring multilingual supervision.<n>LUSIFER's architecture combines a multilingual encoder, serving as a language-universal learner, with an LLM-based embedding model optimized for embedding-specific tasks.<n>We introduce a new benchmark encompassing 5 primary embedding tasks, 123 diverse datasets, and coverage across 14 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-01T15:43:07Z)
• Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following [51.18383180774354]
  We introduce Multi-IF, a new benchmark designed to assess Large Language Models' proficiency in following multi-turn and multilingual instructions. Our evaluation of 14 state-of-the-art LLMs on Multi-IF reveals that it presents a significantly more challenging task than existing benchmarks. languages with non-Latin scripts (Hindi, Russian, and Chinese) generally exhibit higher error rates, suggesting potential limitations in the models' multilingual capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T00:59:47Z)
• Qtok: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Multilingual Tokenizer Quality in Large Language Models [0.0]
  The quality of tokenization can significantly impact a model's ability to handle diverse languages effectively. We introduce Qtok, a tool designed to assess tokenizer quality with a specific emphasis on their performance in multilingual contexts. Qtok applies these metrics to evaluate 13 distinct tokenizers from 58 publicly available models, analyzing their output across different linguistic contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T19:34:34Z)
• Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models in Compositional Relation Reasoning [3.2857239461014465]
  We present a comprehensive evaluation of large language models' ability to reason about composition relations through a benchmark encompassing 1,500 test cases in English. Acknowledging the significance of multilingual capabilities, we expanded our assessment to include translations of these cases into Chinese, Japanese, French, and Korean.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T03:07:10Z)
• Investigating Multilingual Instruction-Tuning: Do Polyglot Models Demand for Multilingual Instructions? [42.37657013017192]
  We show that instruction-tuning on parallel instead of monolingual corpora benefits cross-lingual instruction following capabilities by up to 9.9%. We also conduct a human annotation study to understand the alignment between human-based and GPT-4-based evaluation within multilingual chat scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T11:07:07Z)
• Turning English-centric LLMs Into Polyglots: How Much Multilinguality Is Needed? [40.13166574854085]
  We investigate the minimal amount of multilinguality required to elicit cross-lingual generalisation in English-centric large language models. We find that multilingual instruction tuning with as few as two to three languages is both necessary and sufficient to elicit effective cross-lingual generalisation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T00:49:52Z)
• MELA: Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability [7.524375463656369]
  We present the largest benchmark to date on linguistic acceptability: Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability -- MELA, with 46K samples covering 10 languages. In pursuit of multilingual interpretability, we conduct probing experiments with fine-tuned XLM-R. Cross-lingual transfer experiments show that transfer in acceptability judgment is non-trivial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T15:25:28Z)
• Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation? [20.476500441734427]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Their evaluation, particularly in languages beyond the top $20$, remains inadequate due to existing benchmarks and metrics limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T06:41:58Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• BUFFET: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Few-shot Cross-lingual Transfer [81.5984433881309]
  We introduce BUFFET, which unifies 15 diverse tasks across 54 languages in a sequence-to-sequence format. BUFFET is designed to establish a rigorous and equitable evaluation framework for few-shot cross-lingual transfer. Our findings reveal significant room for improvement in few-shot in-context cross-lingual transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:06:33Z)
• XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluation [93.80733419450225]
  This paper analyzes the current state of cross-lingual transfer learning. We extend XTREME to XTREME-R, which consists of an improved set of ten natural language understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T12:26:12Z)
• XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalization [128.37244072182506]
  Cross-lingual TRansfer Evaluation of Multilinguals XTREME is a benchmark for evaluating the cross-lingual generalization capabilities of multilingual representations across 40 languages and 9 tasks. We demonstrate that while models tested on English reach human performance on many tasks, there is still a sizable gap in the performance of cross-lingually transferred models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-24T19:09:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.