A Representationalist, Functionalist and Naturalistic Conception of Intelligence as a Foundation for AGI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07600v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:58:00 GMT
• Title: A Representationalist, Functionalist and Naturalistic Conception of Intelligence as a Foundation for AGI
• Authors: Rolf Pfister,
• Abstract summary: The article analyses foundational principles relevant to the creation of artificial general intelligence (AGI)<n> Intelligence is understood as the ability to create novel skills that allow to achieve goals under previously unknown conditions.<n>It is shown that AGI can gain a more fundamental access to the world than humans, although it is limited by the No Free Lunch theorems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The article analyses foundational principles relevant to the creation of artificial general intelligence (AGI). Intelligence is understood as the ability to create novel skills that allow to achieve goals under previously unknown conditions. To this end, intelligence utilises reasoning methods such as deduction, induction and abduction as well as other methods such as abstraction and classification to develop a world model. The methods are applied to indirect and incomplete representations of the world, which are obtained through perception, for example, and which do not depict the world but only correspond to it. Due to these limitations and the uncertain and contingent nature of reasoning, the world model is constructivist. Its value is functionally determined by its viability, i.e., its potential to achieve the desired goals. In consequence, meaning is assigned to representations by attributing them a function that makes it possible to achieve a goal. This representational and functional conception of intelligence enables a naturalistic interpretation that does not presuppose mental features, such as intentionality and consciousness, which are regarded as independent of intelligence. Based on a phenomenological analysis, it is shown that AGI can gain a more fundamental access to the world than humans, although it is limited by the No Free Lunch theorems, which require assumptions to be made.

Related papers

• Toward the Axiomatization of Intelligence: Structure, Time, and Existence [0.0]
  This study aims to construct an axiomatic definition of intelligence within a meta-framework. We formalize a set-theoretic representation of the universe as the domain wherein intelligence exists. We compare and interpret three examples in terms of their intelligence, structural properties, and biological plausibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T12:55:37Z)
• Cognitive Science-Inspired Evaluation of Core Capabilities for Object Understanding in AI [12.186516430861882]
  We present a comprehensive overview of the main theoretical frameworks in objecthood research. We evaluate how current AI paradigms approach and test objecthood capabilities compared to those in cognitive science. We find that, whilst benchmarks can detect that AI systems model isolated aspects of objecthood, the benchmarks cannot detect when AI systems lack functional integration across these capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T16:35:02Z)
• A theory of understanding for artificial intelligence: composability, catalysts, and learning [3.863838486311001]
  We show how the structure of a subject can be revealed by analyzing its components that act as catalysts. We argue that a subject's learning ability can be regarded as its ability to compose inputs into its inner catalysts. Our analysis indicates that models capable of generating outputs that can function as their own catalysts, such as language models, establish a foundation for potentially overcoming existing limitations in AI understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T00:17:18Z)
• On a Functional Definition of Intelligence [0.0]
  Without an agreed-upon definition of intelligence, asking "is this system intelligent?"" is an untestable question. Most work on precisely capturing what we mean by "intelligence" has come from the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. We present an argument for a purely functional, black-box definition of intelligence, distinct from how that intelligence is actually achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T05:46:49Z)
• A Novel Neural-symbolic System under Statistical Relational Learning [47.30190559449236]
  We propose a neural-symbolic framework based on statistical relational learning, referred to as NSF-SRL.<n>Results of symbolic reasoning are utilized to refine and correct the predictions made by deep learning models, while deep learning models enhance the efficiency of the symbolic reasoning process.<n>We believe that this approach sets a new standard for neural-symbolic systems and will drive future research in the field of general artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T09:15:37Z)
• A Theory of Intelligences [0.0]
  I develop a framework that applies across all systems from physics, to biology, humans and AI. I present general equations for intelligence and its components, and a simple expression for the evolution of intelligence traits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T20:18:43Z)
• Brain in a Vat: On Missing Pieces Towards Artificial General Intelligence in Large Language Models [83.63242931107638]
  We propose four characteristics of generally intelligent agents. We argue that active engagement with objects in the real world delivers more robust signals for forming conceptual representations. We conclude by outlining promising future research directions in the field of artificial general intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T13:58:16Z)
• A Categorical Framework of General Intelligence [12.134564449202708]
  Since Alan Turing asked this question in 1950, nobody is able to give a direct answer. We introduce a categorical framework towards this goal, with two main results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T13:37:01Z)
• Beyond Interpretable Benchmarks: Contextual Learning through Cognitive and Multimodal Perception [0.0]
  This study contends that the Turing Test is misinterpreted as an attempt to anthropomorphize computer systems. It emphasizes tacit learning as a cornerstone of general-purpose intelligence, despite its lack of overt interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-04T08:30:04Z)
• Kernel Based Cognitive Architecture for Autonomous Agents [91.3755431537592]
  This paper considers an evolutionary approach to creating a cognitive functionality. We consider a cognitive architecture which ensures the evolution of the agent on the basis of Symbol Emergence Problem solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T12:41:32Z)
• WenLan 2.0: Make AI Imagine via a Multimodal Foundation Model [74.4875156387271]
  We develop a novel foundation model pre-trained with huge multimodal (visual and textual) data. We show that state-of-the-art results can be obtained on a wide range of downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T12:25:21Z)
• Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning via Probabilistic Abduction and Execution [97.50813120600026]
  Spatial-temporal reasoning is a challenging task in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Recent works have focused on an abstract reasoning task of this kind -- Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM) We propose a neuro-symbolic Probabilistic Abduction and Execution learner (PrAE) learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:18Z)
• Logical Neural Networks [51.46602187496816]
  We propose a novel framework seamlessly providing key properties of both neural nets (learning) and symbolic logic (knowledge and reasoning) Every neuron has a meaning as a component of a formula in a weighted real-valued logic, yielding a highly intepretable disentangled representation. Inference is omni rather than focused on predefined target variables, and corresponds to logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T16:55:45Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.