Dialogue Injection Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs through Context Manipulation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08195v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:00:45 GMT
• Title: Dialogue Injection Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs through Context Manipulation
• Authors: Wenlong Meng, Fan Zhang, Wendao Yao, Zhenyuan Guo, Yuwei Li, Chengkun Wei, Wenzhi Chen,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel jailbreak paradigm, Dialogue Injection Attack (DIA), which leverages the dialogue history to enhance the success rates of such attacks.<n>DIA operates in a black-box setting, requiring only access to the chat API or knowledge of the LLM's chat template.<n>Our experiments show that DIA achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates on recent LLMs, including Llama-3.1 and GPT-4o.
• Score: 12.376058015074186
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant utility in a wide range of applications; however, their deployment is plagued by security vulnerabilities, notably jailbreak attacks. These attacks manipulate LLMs to generate harmful or unethical content by crafting adversarial prompts. While much of the current research on jailbreak attacks has focused on single-turn interactions, it has largely overlooked the impact of historical dialogues on model behavior. In this paper, we introduce a novel jailbreak paradigm, Dialogue Injection Attack (DIA), which leverages the dialogue history to enhance the success rates of such attacks. DIA operates in a black-box setting, requiring only access to the chat API or knowledge of the LLM's chat template. We propose two methods for constructing adversarial historical dialogues: one adapts gray-box prefilling attacks, and the other exploits deferred responses. Our experiments show that DIA achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates on recent LLMs, including Llama-3.1 and GPT-4o. Additionally, we demonstrate that DIA can bypass 5 different defense mechanisms, highlighting its robustness and effectiveness.

Related papers

• Reasoning-Augmented Conversation for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models [53.580928907886324]
  Reasoning-Augmented Conversation is a novel multi-turn jailbreak framework. It reformulates harmful queries into benign reasoning tasks. We show that RACE achieves state-of-the-art attack effectiveness in complex conversational scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T09:27:44Z)
• `Do as I say not as I do': A Semi-Automated Approach for Jailbreak Prompt Attack against Multimodal LLMs [6.151779089440453]
  We introduce the first voice-based jailbreak attack against multimodal large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose a novel strategy, in which the disallowed prompt is flanked by benign, narrative-driven prompts.<n>We demonstrate that Flanking Attack is capable of manipulating state-of-the-art LLMs into generating misaligned and forbidden outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T10:05:08Z)
• Layer-Level Self-Exposure and Patch: Affirmative Token Mitigation for Jailbreak Attack Defense [55.77152277982117]
  We introduce Layer-AdvPatcher, a methodology designed to defend against jailbreak attacks. We use an unlearning strategy to patch specific layers within large language models through self-augmented datasets. Our framework reduces the harmfulness and attack success rate of jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T19:06:03Z)
• MRJ-Agent: An Effective Jailbreak Agent for Multi-Round Dialogue [35.7801861576917]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate outstanding performance in their reservoir of knowledge and understanding capabilities. LLMs have been shown to be prone to illegal or unethical reactions when subjected to jailbreak attacks. We propose a novel multi-round dialogue jailbreaking agent, emphasizing the importance of stealthiness in identifying and mitigating potential threats to human values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:32:09Z)
• Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation [71.92055093709924]
  We propose a novel method that "translates" garbled adversarial prompts into coherent and human-readable natural language adversarial prompts.<n>It also offers a new approach to discovering effective designs for jailbreak prompts, advancing the understanding of jailbreak attacks.<n>Our method achieves over 90% attack success rates against Llama-2-Chat models on AdvBench, despite their outstanding resistance to jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T06:31:04Z)
• Coercing LLMs to do and reveal (almost) anything [80.8601180293558]
  It has been shown that adversarial attacks on large language models (LLMs) can "jailbreak" the model into making harmful statements. We argue that the spectrum of adversarial attacks on LLMs is much larger than merely jailbreaking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T18:59:13Z)
• Leveraging the Context through Multi-Round Interactions for Jailbreaking Attacks [55.603893267803265]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to Jailbreaking attacks. Jailbreaking attacks aim to extract harmful information by subtly modifying the attack query. We focus on a new attack form, called Contextual Interaction Attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T13:45:19Z)
• Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models [118.41733208825278]
  We propose a simple and effective attack method that causes aligned language models to generate objectionable behaviors. Surprisingly, we find that the adversarial prompts generated by our approach are quite transferable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T17:49:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.