Uncovering Utility Functions from Observed Outcomes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13432v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:56:59 GMT
- Title: Uncovering Utility Functions from Observed Outcomes
- Authors: Marta Grzeskiewicz,
- Abstract summary: We present a novel algorithm for determining consumer preferences and utility.<n>PEARL is the only algorithm that can uncover a representation of the utility function that best rationalises observed consumer choice data.<n>Results show PEARL outperforms the benchmark on both noise-free and noisy synthetic data.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Determining consumer preferences and utility is a foundational challenge in economics. They are central in determining consumer behaviour through the utility-maximising consumer decision-making process. However, preferences and utilities are not observable and may not even be known to the individual making the choice; only the outcome is observed in the form of demand. Without the ability to observe the decision-making mechanism, demand estimation becomes a challenging task and current methods fall short due to lack of scalability or ability to identify causal effects. Estimating these effects is critical when considering changes in policy, such as pricing, the impact of taxes and subsidies, and the effect of a tariff. To address the shortcomings of existing methods, we combine revealed preference theory and inverse reinforcement learning to present a novel algorithm, Preference Extraction and Reward Learning (PEARL) which, to the best of our knowledge, is the only algorithm that can uncover a representation of the utility function that best rationalises observed consumer choice data given a specified functional form. We introduce a flexible utility function, the Input-Concave Neural Network which captures complex relationships across goods, including cross-price elasticities. Results show PEARL outperforms the benchmark on both noise-free and noisy synthetic data.
Related papers
- Feature Responsiveness Scores: Model-Agnostic Explanations for Recourse [7.730963708373791]
Consumer protection rules mandate that we provide a list of "principal reasons" to consumers who receive adverse decisions.
In practice, lenders and employers identify principal reasons by returning the top-scoring features from a feature attribution method.
We show that standard attribution methods can mislead individuals by highlighting reasons without recourse.
We propose to address these issues by scoring features on the basis of responsiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T23:37:49Z) - Switchable Decision: Dynamic Neural Generation Networks [98.61113699324429]
We propose a switchable decision to accelerate inference by dynamically assigning resources for each data instance.
Our method benefits from less cost during inference while keeping the same accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-07T17:44:54Z) - Causal Feature Selection via Transfer Entropy [59.999594949050596]
Causal discovery aims to identify causal relationships between features with observational data.
We introduce a new causal feature selection approach that relies on the forward and backward feature selection procedures.
We provide theoretical guarantees on the regression and classification errors for both the exact and the finite-sample cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T08:04:45Z) - A Causal Perspective on Loan Pricing: Investigating the Impacts of
Selection Bias on Identifying Bid-Response Functions [1.0937531920233807]
We take a step towards understanding the effects of selection bias by posing pricing as a problem of causal inference.
In our experiments, we simulate varying levels of selection bias on a semi-synthetic dataset on mortgage loan applications in Belgium.
We implement state-of-the-art methods from causal machine learning and show their capability to overcome selection bias in pricing data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T14:14:30Z) - Choice Models and Permutation Invariance: Demand Estimation in
Differentiated Products Markets [5.8429701619765755]
We demonstrate how non-parametric estimators like neural nets can easily approximate choice functions.
Our proposed functionals can flexibly capture underlying consumer behavior in a completely data-driven fashion.
Our empirical analysis confirms that the estimator generates realistic and comparable own- and cross-price elasticities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-13T23:24:05Z) - Towards Sequence Utility Maximization under Utility Occupancy Measure [53.234101208024335]
In the database, although utility is a flexible criterion for each pattern, it is a more absolute criterion due to neglect of utility sharing.
We first define utility occupancy on sequence data and raise the problem of High Utility-Occupancy Sequential Pattern Mining.
An algorithm called Sequence Utility Maximization with Utility occupancy measure (SUMU) is proposed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T17:28:53Z) - Learning to be Fair: A Consequentialist Approach to Equitable
Decision-Making [21.152377319502705]
We present an alternative framework for designing equitable algorithms.
In our approach, one first elicits stakeholder preferences over the space of possible decisions.
We then optimize over the space of decision policies, making trade-offs in a way that maximizes the elicited utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T00:30:43Z) - Loss Bounds for Approximate Influence-Based Abstraction [81.13024471616417]
Influence-based abstraction aims to gain leverage by modeling local subproblems together with the 'influence' that the rest of the system exerts on them.
This paper investigates the performance of such approaches from a theoretical perspective.
We show that neural networks trained with cross entropy are well suited to learn approximate influence representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T15:33:10Z) - Learning Interpretable Feature Context Effects in Discrete Choice [40.91593765662774]
We provide a method for the automatic discovery of a broad class of context effects from observed choice data.
Our models are easier to train and more flexible than existing models and also yield intuitive, interpretable, and statistically testable context effects.
We identify new context effects in widely used choice datasets and provide the first analysis of choice set context effects in social network growth.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-07T20:59:24Z) - Implications on Feature Detection when using the Benefit-Cost Ratio [0.0]
A popular trade-off choice is the ratio of both, the BCR (benefit-cost ratio)
In situations with large cost differences and small effect sizes, the BCR missed relevant features and preferred cheap noise features.
While the simple benefit-cost ratio offers an easy solution to incorporate costs, it is important to be aware of its risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-12T08:25:42Z) - Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely
Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure.
We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z) - Cost-Sensitive Portfolio Selection via Deep Reinforcement Learning [100.73223416589596]
We propose a cost-sensitive portfolio selection method with deep reinforcement learning.
Specifically, a novel two-stream portfolio policy network is devised to extract both price series patterns and asset correlations.
A new cost-sensitive reward function is developed to maximize the accumulated return and constrain both costs via reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-06T06:28:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.