Quantification of Uncertainties in Probabilistic Deep Neural Network by Implementing Boosting of Variational Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13909v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 05:11:21 GMT
• Title: Quantification of Uncertainties in Probabilistic Deep Neural Network by Implementing Boosting of Variational Inference
• Authors: Pavia Bera, Sanjukta Bhanja,
• Abstract summary: Boosted Bayesian Neural Networks (BBNN) is a novel approach that enhances neural network weight distribution approximations.<n>BBNN achieves 5% higher accuracy compared to conventional neural networks.
• Score: 0.38366697175402226
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern neural network architectures have achieved remarkable accuracies but remain highly dependent on their training data, often lacking interpretability in their learned mappings. While effective on large datasets, they tend to overfit on smaller ones. Probabilistic neural networks, such as those utilizing variational inference, address this limitation by incorporating uncertainty estimation through weight distributions rather than point estimates. However, standard variational inference often relies on a single-density approximation, which can lead to poor posterior estimates and hinder model performance. We propose Boosted Bayesian Neural Networks (BBNN), a novel approach that enhances neural network weight distribution approximations using Boosting Variational Inference (BVI). By iteratively constructing a mixture of densities, BVI expands the approximating family, enabling a more expressive posterior that leads to improved generalization and uncertainty estimation. While this approach increases computational complexity, it significantly enhances accuracy an essential tradeoff, particularly in high-stakes applications such as medical diagnostics, where false negatives can have severe consequences. Our experimental results demonstrate that BBNN achieves ~5% higher accuracy compared to conventional neural networks while providing superior uncertainty quantification. This improvement highlights the effectiveness of leveraging a mixture-based variational family to better approximate the posterior distribution, ultimately advancing probabilistic deep learning.

Related papers

• Deep Neural Networks Tend To Extrapolate Predictably [51.303814412294514]
  neural network predictions tend to be unpredictable and overconfident when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. We observe that neural network predictions often tend towards a constant value as input data becomes increasingly OOD. We show how one can leverage our insights in practice to enable risk-sensitive decision-making in the presence of OOD inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T03:25:32Z)
• Sparsifying Bayesian neural networks with latent binary variables and normalizing flows [10.865434331546126]
  We will consider two extensions to the latent binary Bayesian neural networks (LBBNN) method. Firstly, by using the local reparametrization trick (LRT) to sample the hidden units directly, we get a more computationally efficient algorithm. More importantly, by using normalizing flows on the variational posterior distribution of the LBBNN parameters, the network learns a more flexible variational posterior distribution than the mean field Gaussian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T09:40:28Z)
• Toward Robust Uncertainty Estimation with Random Activation Functions [3.0586855806896045]
  We propose a novel approach for uncertainty quantification via ensembles, called Random Activation Functions (RAFs) Ensemble. RAFs Ensemble outperforms state-of-the-art ensemble uncertainty quantification methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T13:17:56Z)
• Improved uncertainty quantification for neural networks with Bayesian last layer [0.0]
  Uncertainty quantification is an important task in machine learning. We present a reformulation of the log-marginal likelihood of a NN with BLL which allows for efficient training using backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T20:23:56Z)
• Confidence-Nets: A Step Towards better Prediction Intervals for regression Neural Networks on small datasets [0.0]
  We propose an ensemble method that attempts to estimate the uncertainty of predictions, increase their accuracy and provide an interval for the expected variation. The proposed method is tested on various datasets, and a significant improvement in the performance of the neural network model is seen.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T06:38:40Z)
• Can pruning improve certified robustness of neural networks? [106.03070538582222]
  We show that neural network pruning can improve empirical robustness of deep neural networks (NNs) Our experiments show that by appropriately pruning an NN, its certified accuracy can be boosted up to 8.2% under standard training. We additionally observe the existence of certified lottery tickets that can match both standard and certified robust accuracies of the original dense models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T05:48:51Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Ramifications of Approximate Posterior Inference for Bayesian Deep Learning in Adversarial and Out-of-Distribution Settings [7.476901945542385]
  We show that Bayesian deep learning models on certain occasions marginally outperform conventional neural networks. Preliminary investigations indicate the potential inherent role of bias due to choices of initialisation, architecture or activation functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-03T16:58:15Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Diversity inducing Information Bottleneck in Model Ensembles [73.80615604822435]
  In this paper, we target the problem of generating effective ensembles of neural networks by encouraging diversity in prediction. We explicitly optimize a diversity inducing adversarial loss for learning latent variables and thereby obtain diversity in the output predictions necessary for modeling multi-modal data. Compared to the most competitive baselines, we show significant improvements in classification accuracy, under a shift in the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T03:10:41Z)
• Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networks [65.24701908364383]
  We show that a sufficient condition for a uncertainty on a ReLU network is "to be a bit Bayesian calibrated" We further validate these findings empirically via various standard experiments using common deep ReLU networks and Laplace approximations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T08:52:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.