Forensics-Bench: A Comprehensive Forgery Detection Benchmark Suite for Large Vision Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15024v2
• Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:00:23 GMT
• Title: Forensics-Bench: A Comprehensive Forgery Detection Benchmark Suite for Large Vision Language Models
• Authors: Jin Wang, Chenghui Lv, Xian Li, Shichao Dong, Huadong Li, kelu Yao, Chao Li, Wenqi Shao, Ping Luo,
• Abstract summary: Forensics-Bench is a new forgery detection evaluation benchmark suite.<n>It comprises 63,292 meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions, covering 112 unique forgery detection types.<n>We conduct thorough evaluations on 22 open-sourced LVLMs and 3 proprietary models GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
• Score: 53.55128042938329
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recently, the rapid development of AIGC has significantly boosted the diversities of fake media spread in the Internet, posing unprecedented threats to social security, politics, law, and etc. To detect the ever-increasingly diverse malicious fake media in the new era of AIGC, recent studies have proposed to exploit Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) to design robust forgery detectors due to their impressive performance on a wide range of multimodal tasks. However, it still lacks a comprehensive benchmark designed to comprehensively assess LVLMs' discerning capabilities on forgery media. To fill this gap, we present Forensics-Bench, a new forgery detection evaluation benchmark suite to assess LVLMs across massive forgery detection tasks, requiring comprehensive recognition, location and reasoning capabilities on diverse forgeries. Forensics-Bench comprises 63,292 meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions, covering 112 unique forgery detection types from 5 perspectives: forgery semantics, forgery modalities, forgery tasks, forgery types and forgery models. We conduct thorough evaluations on 22 open-sourced LVLMs and 3 proprietary models GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, highlighting the significant challenges of comprehensive forgery detection posed by Forensics-Bench. We anticipate that Forensics-Bench will motivate the community to advance the frontier of LVLMs, striving for all-around forgery detectors in the era of AIGC. The deliverables will be updated at https://Forensics-Bench.github.io/.

Related papers

• A Hitchhikers Guide to Fine-Grained Face Forgery Detection Using Common Sense Reasoning [9.786907179872815]
  The potential of vision and language remains underexplored in face forgery detection. There is a need for a methodology that converts face forgery detection to a Visual Question Answering (VQA) task. We propose a multi-staged approach that diverges from the traditional binary decision paradigm to address this gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T08:16:40Z)
• A Comprehensive Library for Benchmarking Multi-class Visual Anomaly Detection [52.228708947607636]
  This paper introduces a comprehensive visual anomaly detection benchmark, ADer, which is a modular framework for new methods. The benchmark includes multiple datasets from industrial and medical domains, implementing fifteen state-of-the-art methods and nine comprehensive metrics. We objectively reveal the strengths and weaknesses of different methods and provide insights into the challenges and future directions of multi-class visual anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:40:07Z)
• DetToolChain: A New Prompting Paradigm to Unleash Detection Ability of MLLM [81.75988648572347]
  We present DetToolChain, a novel prompting paradigm to unleash the zero-shot object detection ability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) Our approach consists of a detection prompting toolkit inspired by high-precision detection priors and a new Chain-of-Thought to implement these prompts. We show that GPT-4V with our DetToolChain improves state-of-the-art object detectors by +21.5% AP50 on MS Novel class set for open-vocabulary detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T06:54:33Z)
• SHIELD : An Evaluation Benchmark for Face Spoofing and Forgery Detection with Multimodal Large Language Models [61.8876114116716]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in vision-related tasks. However, their ability to detect subtle visual spoofing and forgery clues in face attack detection tasks remains underexplored. We introduce a benchmark, SHIELD, to evaluate MLLMs for face spoofing and forgery detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T17:31:36Z)
• A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content [97.87912800179531]
  The ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance. We aim to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks. We also posit the necessity for a multi-faceted approach to defend against various attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T09:10:26Z)
• Large Language Model-Powered Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: New Perspectives [8.524720028421447]
  This paper provides a systematic analysis of the opportunities, challenges, and potential solutions of harnessing Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4. generating more answers with higher randomness largely boosts the likelihood of producing a correct answer but inevitably leads to a higher number of false positives. We propose an adversarial framework dubbed GPTLens that breaks the conventional one-stage detection into two synergistic stages $-$ generation and discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T12:37:23Z)
• Detect Any Deepfakes: Segment Anything Meets Face Forgery Detection and Localization [30.317619885984005]
  We introduce the well-trained vision segmentation foundation model, i.e., Segment Anything Model (SAM) in face forgery detection and localization. Based on SAM, we propose the Detect Any Deepfakes (DADF) framework with the Multiscale Adapter. The proposed framework seamlessly integrates end-to-end forgery localization and detection optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T16:25:04Z)
• MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection [54.81446366272403]
  This paper proposes the first benchmark framework for MGT detection against powerful large language models (LLMs) We show that a larger number of words in general leads to better performance and most detection methods can achieve similar performance with much fewer training samples. Our findings indicate that the model-based detection methods still perform well in the text attribution task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-26T21:12:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.