Predicting Multi-Agent Specialization via Task Parallelizability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15703v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 21:33:48 GMT
• Title: Predicting Multi-Agent Specialization via Task Parallelizability
• Authors: Elizabeth Mieczkowski, Ruaridh Mon-Williams, Neil Bramley, Christopher G. Lucas, Natalia Velez, Thomas L. Griffiths,
• Abstract summary: We show that specialist teams outperform generalist ones when environmental constraints limit task parallelizability.<n>We also observe that as the state space expands, agents tend to converge on specialist strategies, even when generalist ones are theoretically more efficient.<n>Our findings provide a principled framework for interpreting specialization given the task and environment.
• Score: 4.9553580237478
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-agent systems often rely on specialized agents with distinct roles rather than general-purpose agents that perform the entire task independently. However, the conditions that govern the optimal degree of specialization remain poorly understood. In this work, we propose that specialist teams outperform generalist ones when environmental constraints limit task parallelizability -- the potential to execute task components concurrently. Drawing inspiration from distributed systems, we introduce a heuristic to predict the relative efficiency of generalist versus specialist teams by estimating the speed-up achieved when two agents perform a task in parallel rather than focus on complementary subtasks. We validate this heuristic through three multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) experiments in Overcooked-AI, demonstrating that key factors limiting task parallelizability influence specialization. We also observe that as the state space expands, agents tend to converge on specialist strategies, even when generalist ones are theoretically more efficient, highlighting potential biases in MARL training algorithms. Our findings provide a principled framework for interpreting specialization given the task and environment, and introduce a novel benchmark for evaluating whether MARL finds optimal strategies.

Related papers

• Symbolic Mixture-of-Experts: Adaptive Skill-based Routing for Heterogeneous Reasoning [76.10639521319382]
  We propose Symbolic-MoE, a symbolic, text-based, and gradient-free Mixture-of-Experts framework. We show that Symbolic-MoE's instance-level expert selection improves performance by a large margin but -- when implemented naively -- can introduce a high computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T18:03:13Z)
• Towards more Contextual Agents: An extractor-Generator Optimization Framework [0.0]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex tasks across a wide range of general-purpose applications.<n>However, their performance often degrades in context-specific scenarios, such as specialized industries or research domains.<n>To address this challenge, our work introduces a systematic approach to enhance the contextual adaptability of LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:07:06Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.<n>We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• CoPS: Empowering LLM Agents with Provable Cross-Task Experience Sharing [70.25689961697523]
  We propose a generalizable algorithm that enhances sequential reasoning by cross-task experience sharing and selection. Our work bridges the gap between existing sequential reasoning paradigms and validates the effectiveness of leveraging cross-task experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T03:59:53Z)
• Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Sub-optimal Experts [56.553106680769474]
  We study the theoretical properties of the class of reward functions that are compatible with a given set of experts. Our results show that the presence of multiple sub-optimal experts can significantly shrink the set of compatible rewards. We analyze a uniform sampling algorithm that results in being minimax optimal whenever the sub-optimal experts' performance level is sufficiently close to the one of the optimal agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T12:39:25Z)
• Harnessing Pre-trained Generalist Agents for Software Engineering Tasks [13.733085206098258]
  Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been successfully used for automation in complex tasks such as game testing and solving the job-shop scheduling problem. Specialist DRL agents suffer from a lack of generalizability to other tasks and need substantial time to be developed and re-trained effectively. Recently, DRL researchers have begun to develop generalist agents, able to learn a policy from various environments and capable of achieving performances similar to or better than specialist agents in new tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T18:39:58Z)
• ALMA: Hierarchical Learning for Composite Multi-Agent Tasks [21.556661319375255]
  We introduce ALMA, a general learning method for taking advantage of structured tasks. ALMA simultaneously learns a high-level subtask allocation policy and low-level agent policies. We demonstrate that ALMA learns sophisticated coordination behavior in a number of challenging environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T19:12:23Z)
• LDSA: Learning Dynamic Subtask Assignment in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [122.47938710284784]
  We propose a novel framework for learning dynamic subtask assignment (LDSA) in cooperative MARL. To reasonably assign agents to different subtasks, we propose an ability-based subtask selection strategy. We show that LDSA learns reasonable and effective subtask assignment for better collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T10:46:16Z)
• Reward Machines for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [30.84689303706561]
  In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, a collection of agents learns to interact in a shared environment to achieve a common goal. We propose the use of reward machines (RM) -- Mealy machines used as structured representations of reward functions -- to encode the team's task. The proposed novel interpretation of RMs in the multi-agent setting explicitly encodes required teammate interdependencies, allowing the team-level task to be decomposed into sub-tasks for individual agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T23:08:14Z)
• Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [59.62721526353915]
  Multi-agent settings in the real world often involve tasks with varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities. Our method aims to leverage these commonalities by asking the question: What is the expected utility of each agent when only considering a randomly selected sub-group of its observed entities?''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T18:28:41Z)
• Individual specialization in multi-task environments with multiagent reinforcement learners [0.0]
  There is a growing interest in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) as the first steps towards building general intelligent agents. Previous results point us towards increased conditions for coordination, efficiency/fairness, and common-pool resource sharing. We further study coordination in multi-task environments where several rewarding tasks can be performed and thus agents don't necessarily need to perform well in all tasks, but under certain conditions may specialize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-29T15:20:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.