Enhancing LLM Code Generation with Ensembles: A Similarity-Based Selection Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15838v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 04:38:56 GMT
• Title: Enhancing LLM Code Generation with Ensembles: A Similarity-Based Selection Approach
• Authors: Tarek Mahmud, Bin Duan, Corina Pasareanu, Guowei Yang,
• Abstract summary: We propose an ensemble approach for large language models (LLMs) in code generation.<n>For voting, we compute syntactic and semantic similarity using CodeBLEU and behavioral equivalence.<n>We show through experiments that our ensemble approach consistently outperforms standalone LLMs.
• Score: 6.93983229112122
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Ensemble learning has been widely used in machine learning to improve model robustness, accuracy, and generalization, but has not yet been applied to code generation tasks with large language models (LLMs). We propose an ensemble approach for LLMs in code generation. Instead of relying on the output of a single model, we generate multiple candidate programs from different LLMs and apply a structured voting mechanism to select the most reliable solution. For voting, we compute syntactic and semantic similarity using CodeBLEU and behavioral equivalence using CrossHair's differential behavior analysis. By aggregating these similarity scores, we select the program that best aligns with the consensus among the candidates. We show through experiments that our ensemble approach consistently outperforms standalone LLMs on the well-known HumanEval and the more challenging LiveCodeBench datasets, achieving an accuracy of 90.2% and 50.2%, respectively, on the two datasets. In comparison, the best-performing LLM (GPT-4o) has an accuracy of 83.5% and 43.4%, respectively. Furthermore, even when restricted to free open-source models, our method achieves an accuracy of 80.5% and 41.6%, respectively, demonstrating the viability of our approach in resource-constrained settings.

Related papers

• Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models. Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining. We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z)
• MLLM-Selector: Necessity and Diversity-driven High-Value Data Selection for Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning [69.7347209018861]
  We introduce MLLM-Selector, an automated approach that identifies valuable data for visual instruction tuning. We calculate necessity scores for each sample in the VIT data pool to identify samples pivotal for enhancing model performance. Our findings underscore the importance of mixing necessity and diversity in data choice, leading to the creation of MLLM-Selector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T12:42:37Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications.<n> Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge.<n>We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• Weighted-Reward Preference Optimization for Implicit Model Fusion [35.57286356489511]
  We propose an implicit fusion method, which leverages preference optimization between the source LLMs and the target LLM to transfer their capabilities effectively.<n>WRPO eliminates the need for vocabulary alignment and matrix fusion and can be efficiently scaled to accommodate various LLMs.<n>Experiments on the MT-Bench, AlpacaEval-2, and Arena-Hard benchmarks demonstrate that WRPO consistently outperforms existing knowledge fusion methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T10:15:12Z)
• SelectLLM: Query-Aware Efficient Selection Algorithm for Large Language Models [8.558834738072363]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted due to their remarkable performance across various applications.<n>These individual LLMs show limitations in generalization and performance on complex tasks due to inherent training biases, model size constraints, and the quality or diversity of pre-training datasets.<n>We introduce SelectLLM, which efficiently directs input queries to the most suitable subset of LLMs from a large pool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T06:11:21Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• LOLA: LLM-Assisted Online Learning Algorithm for Content Experiments [2.2021543101231167]
  Modern media firms require automated and efficient methods to identify content that is most engaging and appealing to users. We first investigate the ability of three pure-LLM approaches to identify the catchiest headline: prompt-based methods, embedding-based methods, and fine-tuned open-source LLMs. We then introduce the LLM-Assisted Online Learning Algorithm (LOLA), a novel framework that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with adaptive experimentation to optimize content delivery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T07:56:58Z)
• MLLM-DataEngine: An Iterative Refinement Approach for MLLM [62.30753425449056]
  We propose a novel closed-loop system that bridges data generation, model training, and evaluation. Within each loop, the MLLM-DataEngine first analyze the weakness of the model based on the evaluation results. For targeting, we propose an Adaptive Bad-case Sampling module, which adjusts the ratio of different types of data. For quality, we resort to GPT-4 to generate high-quality data with each given data type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T01:41:04Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• Generative Multimodal Entity Linking [24.322540112710918]
  Multimodal Entity Linking (MEL) is the task of mapping mentions with multimodal contexts to referent entities from a knowledge base. Existing MEL methods mainly focus on designing complex multimodal interaction mechanisms and require fine-tuning all model parameters. We propose GEMEL, a Generative Multimodal Entity Linking framework based on Large Language Models (LLMs) Our framework is compatible with any off-the-shelf language model, paving the way towards an efficient and general solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T07:57:19Z)
• Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs [60.58434523646137]
  A popular approach for improving the correctness of output from large language models (LLMs) is Self-Consistency. We introduce Adaptive-Consistency, a cost-efficient, model-agnostic technique that dynamically adjusts the number of samples per question. Our experiments show that Adaptive-Consistency reduces sample budget by up to 7.9 times with an average accuracy drop of less than 0.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T17:49:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.