Effective Yet Ephemeral Propaganda Defense: There Needs to Be More than One-Shot Inoculation to Enhance Critical Thinking
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16497v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:24:19 GMT
- Title: Effective Yet Ephemeral Propaganda Defense: There Needs to Be More than One-Shot Inoculation to Enhance Critical Thinking
- Authors: Nicolas Hoferer, Kilian Sprenkamp, Dorian Christoph Quelle, Daniel Gordon Jones, Zoya Katashinskaya, Alexandre Bovet, Liudmila Zavolokina,
- Abstract summary: We investigate the lasting effect on critical thinking and propaganda awareness on them when using a propaganda detection and contextualization tool.<n>We use Kahneman's dual-system theory to measure the tools' impact on critical thinking.
- Score: 38.235554731814005
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In today's media landscape, propaganda distribution has a significant impact on society. It sows confusion, undermines democratic processes, and leads to increasingly difficult decision-making for news readers. We investigate the lasting effect on critical thinking and propaganda awareness on them when using a propaganda detection and contextualization tool. Building on inoculation theory, which suggests that preemptively exposing individuals to weakened forms of propaganda can improve their resilience against it, we integrate Kahneman's dual-system theory to measure the tools' impact on critical thinking. Through a two-phase online experiment, we measure the effect of several inoculation doses. Our findings show that while the tool increases critical thinking during its use, this increase vanishes without access to the tool. This indicates a single use of the tool does not create a lasting impact. We discuss the implications and propose possible approaches to improve the resilience against propaganda in the long-term.
Related papers
- MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts" [50.069577397751175]
We introduce a framework for generating and evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions.
We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users.
Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-13T18:16:50Z) - PropaInsight: Toward Deeper Understanding of Propaganda in Terms of Techniques, Appeals, and Intent [71.20471076045916]
Propaganda plays a critical role in shaping public opinion and fueling disinformation.<n>Propainsight systematically dissects propaganda into techniques, arousal appeals, and underlying intent.<n>Propagaze combines human-annotated data with high-quality synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T06:28:18Z) - Think Fast, Think Slow, Think Critical: Designing an Automated Propaganda Detection Tool [1.9643285694999644]
This paper introduces the design of ClarifAI, a novel automated propaganda detection tool.
Using Large Language Models, ClarifAI detects propaganda in news articles and provides context-rich explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T13:12:31Z) - Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph
with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics.
Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z) - Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and
Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation.
We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z) - The Spread of Propaganda by Coordinated Communities on Social Media [43.2770127582382]
We analyze the spread of propaganda and its interplay with coordinated behavior on a large Twitter dataset about the 2019 UK general election.
The combination of the use of propaganda and coordinated behavior allows us to uncover the authenticity and harmfulness of the different communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T13:39:10Z) - Deception and the Strategy of Influence [0.7874708385247353]
We explore how methods of deception including audience building, media hijacking, and community subversion inform the techniques and tradecraft of today's influence operators.
We then discuss how a properly equipped and informed public can diagnose and counter malign influence operations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-02T21:39:00Z) - Prta: A System to Support the Analysis of Propaganda Techniques in the
News [34.61449860876045]
Prta allows users to explore the articles crawled on a regular basis by highlighting the spans in which propaganda techniques occur.
The system further reports statistics about the use of such techniques, overall and over time, or according to filtering criteria specified by the user.
It allows users to analyze any text or URL through a dedicated interface or via an API.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-12T15:20:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.