Deception and the Strategy of Influence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01331v1
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 21:39:00 GMT
- Title: Deception and the Strategy of Influence
- Authors: Brian B., William Fleshman, Kevin H., Ryan Kaliszewski, Shawn R
- Abstract summary: We explore how methods of deception including audience building, media hijacking, and community subversion inform the techniques and tradecraft of today's influence operators.
We then discuss how a properly equipped and informed public can diagnose and counter malign influence operations.
- Score: 0.7874708385247353
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Organizations have long used deception as a means to exert influence in
pursuit of their agendas. In particular, information operations such as
propaganda distribution, support of antigovernment protest, and revelation of
politically and socially damaging secrets were abundant during World War II and
the Cold War. A key component of each of these efforts is deceiving the targets
by obscuring intent and identity. Information from a trusted source is more
influential than information from an adversary and therefore more likely to
sway opinions. The ubiquitous adoption of social media, characterized by
user-generated and peer disseminated content, has notably increased the
frequency, scale, and efficacy of influence operations worldwide. In this
article, we explore how methods of deception including audience building, media
hijacking, and community subversion inform the techniques and tradecraft of
today's influence operators. We then discuss how a properly equipped and
informed public can diagnose and counter malign influence operations.
Related papers
- MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts" [50.069577397751175]
We introduce a framework for generating and evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions.
We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users.
Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-13T18:16:50Z) - PropaInsight: Toward Deeper Understanding of Propaganda in Terms of Techniques, Appeals, and Intent [71.20471076045916]
Propaganda plays a critical role in shaping public opinion and fueling disinformation.
Propainsight systematically dissects propaganda into techniques, arousal appeals, and underlying intent.
Propagaze combines human-annotated data with high-quality synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T06:28:18Z) - Social Convos: Capturing Agendas and Emotions on Social Media [1.6385815610837167]
We present a novel approach to extract influence indicators from messages circulating among groups of users discussing particular topics.
We focus on two influence indicators: the (control of) agenda and the use of emotional language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-23T19:14:09Z) - News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal
Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
This study investigated information consumption in four European countries.
It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK.
Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z) - Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and
Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation.
We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z) - Detection of Dangerous Events on Social Media: A Perspective Review [0.0]
A phenomenon occurs where people are fed information that motivates them to act on their behalf and carry out their agenda.
This paper introduces a concept of dangerous events to approach this problem and their three main types based on their characteristics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-04T09:48:32Z) - An Agenda for Disinformation Research [3.083055913556838]
Disinformation erodes trust in the socio-political institutions that are the fundamental fabric of democracy.
The distribution of false, misleading, or inaccurate information with the intent to deceive is an existential threat to the United States.
New tools and approaches must be developed to leverage these affordances to understand and address this growing challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-15T19:32:36Z) - Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment:
the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic.
We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content.
Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z) - Analysis of misinformation during the COVID-19 outbreak in China:
cultural, social and political entanglements [6.256108383411306]
COVID-19 resulted in an infodemic, which could erode public trust, impede virus containment, and outlive the pandemic itself.
The evolving and fragmented media landscape is a key driver of the spread of misinformation.
Our findings shed light on the distinct characteristics of misinformation during the COVID-19 and offer insights into combating misinformation in China and across the world at large.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-21T01:34:08Z) - Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content.
We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation.
These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.