AIDetection: A Generative AI Detection Tool for Educators Using Syntactic Matching of Common ASCII Characters As Potential 'AI Traces' Within Users' Internet Browser

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16503v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:53:58 GMT
• Title: AIDetection: A Generative AI Detection Tool for Educators Using Syntactic Matching of Common ASCII Characters As Potential 'AI Traces' Within Users' Internet Browser
• Authors: Andy Buschmann,
• Abstract summary: AIDetection.info employs a syntactic-based approach to identify common traces left by generative AI models.<n>The tool scans documents in bulk for potential AI artifacts, as well as AI citations and acknowledgments, and provides a visual summary with downloadable Excel and CSV reports.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces a simple JavaScript-based web application designed to assist educators in detecting AI-generated content in student essays and written assignments. Unlike existing AI detection tools that rely on obfuscated machine learning models, AIDetection.info employs a heuristic-based approach to identify common syntactic traces left by generative AI models, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Gemini, Llama/Meta, Microsoft Copilot, Grammarly AI, and other text-generating models and wrapper applications. The tool scans documents in bulk for potential AI artifacts, as well as AI citations and acknowledgments, and provides a visual summary with downloadable Excel and CSV reports. This article details its methodology, functionalities, limitations, and applications within educational settings.

Related papers

• Could AI Trace and Explain the Origins of AI-Generated Images and Text? [53.11173194293537]
  AI-generated content is increasingly prevalent in the real world. adversaries might exploit large multimodal models to create images that violate ethical or legal standards. Paper reviewers may misuse large language models to generate reviews without genuine intellectual effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T20:51:54Z)
• Almost AI, Almost Human: The Challenge of Detecting AI-Polished Writing [55.2480439325792]
  Misclassification can lead to false plagiarism accusations and misleading claims about AI prevalence in online content.<n>We systematically evaluate eleven state-of-the-art AI-text detectors using our AI-Polished-Text Evaluation dataset.<n>Our findings reveal that detectors frequently misclassify even minimally polished text as AI-generated, struggle to differentiate between degrees of AI involvement, and exhibit biases against older and smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T18:45:37Z)
• The Synergy of Automated Pipelines with Prompt Engineering and Generative AI in Web Crawling [0.0]
  This study investigates the integration of generative AI tools Claude AI (Sonnet) and ChatGPT4.0 with prompt engineering to automate web scraping.<n>Claude AI consistently outperformed ChatGPT-4.0 in script quality and adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T17:27:55Z)
• LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection [87.43727192273772]
  It is often hard to tell whether a piece of text was human-written or machine-generated.<n>We present LLM-DetectAIve, designed for fine-grained detection.<n>It supports four categories: (i) human-written, (ii) machine-generated, (iii) machine-written, then machine-humanized, and (iv) human-written, then machine-polished.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T07:43:17Z)
• Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototyping [32.235398722593544]
  We present Farsight, a novel in situ interactive tool that helps people identify potential harms from the AI applications they are prototyping. Based on a user's prompt, Farsight highlights news articles about relevant AI incidents and allows users to explore and edit LLM-generated use cases, stakeholders, and harms. We report design insights from a co-design study with 10 AI prototypers and findings from a user study with 42 AI prototypers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T14:38:05Z)
• AI Content Self-Detection for Transformer-based Large Language Models [0.0]
  This paper introduces the idea of direct origin detection and evaluates whether generative AI systems can recognize their output and distinguish it from human-written texts. Google's Bard model exhibits the largest capability of self-detection with an accuracy of 94%, followed by OpenAI's ChatGPT with 83%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T10:08:57Z)
• How to Build an Adaptive AI Tutor for Any Course Using Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) [5.305156933641317]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) presents transformative opportunities for personalized education.<n>Current implementations face two critical challenges: maintaining factual accuracy and delivering coherent, context-aware instruction.<n>This paper introduces Knowledge Graph-enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), a novel framework that integrates structured knowledge representation with context-aware retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T15:02:46Z)
• Perceptions and Detection of AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for Academic Journals [1.881901067333374]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have produced both excitement and worry about how AI will impact academic writing. Authors of academic publications may decide to voluntarily disclose any AI tools they use to revise their manuscripts. journals and conferences could begin mandating disclosure and/or turn to using detection services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T06:04:46Z)
• AI-Generated Images as Data Source: The Dawn of Synthetic Era [61.879821573066216]
  generative AI has unlocked the potential to create synthetic images that closely resemble real-world photographs. This paper explores the innovative concept of harnessing these AI-generated images as new data sources. In contrast to real data, AI-generated data exhibit remarkable advantages, including unmatched abundance and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T06:55:19Z)
• Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected? [50.95804851595018]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) perform impressively well in various applications.<n>The potential for misuse of these models in activities such as plagiarism, generating fake news, and spamming has raised concern about their responsible use.<n>We stress-test the robustness of these AI text detectors in the presence of an attacker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T17:53:19Z)
• How Generative AI models such as ChatGPT can be (Mis)Used in SPC Practice, Education, and Research? An Exploratory Study [2.0841728192954663]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have the potential to revolutionize Statistical Process Control (SPC) practice, learning, and research. These tools are in the early stages of development and can be easily misused or misunderstood. We explore ChatGPT's ability to provide code, explain basic concepts, and create knowledge related to SPC practice, learning, and research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T15:48:37Z)
• GenNI: Human-AI Collaboration for Data-Backed Text Generation [102.08127062293111]
  Table2Text systems generate textual output based on structured data utilizing machine learning. GenNI (Generation Negotiation Interface) is an interactive visual system for high-level human-AI collaboration in producing descriptive text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T18:07:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.