Mind with Eyes: from Language Reasoning to Multimodal Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18071v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 13:40:44 GMT
• Title: Mind with Eyes: from Language Reasoning to Multimodal Reasoning
• Authors: Zhiyu Lin, Yifei Gao, Xian Zhao, Yunfan Yang, Jitao Sang,
• Abstract summary: Language models have recently advanced into the realm of reasoning, yet it is through multimodal reasoning that we can fully unlock the potential to achieve more comprehensive, human-like cognitive capabilities.<n>This survey provides a systematic overview of the recent multimodal reasoning approaches, categorizing them into two levels: language-centric multimodal reasoning and collaborative multimodal reasoning.
• Score: 19.719640188412463
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Language models have recently advanced into the realm of reasoning, yet it is through multimodal reasoning that we can fully unlock the potential to achieve more comprehensive, human-like cognitive capabilities. This survey provides a systematic overview of the recent multimodal reasoning approaches, categorizing them into two levels: language-centric multimodal reasoning and collaborative multimodal reasoning. The former encompasses one-pass visual perception and active visual perception, where vision primarily serves a supporting role in language reasoning. The latter involves action generation and state update within reasoning process, enabling a more dynamic interaction between modalities. Furthermore, we analyze the technical evolution of these methods, discuss their inherent challenges, and introduce key benchmark tasks and evaluation metrics for assessing multimodal reasoning performance. Finally, we provide insights into future research directions from the following two perspectives: (i) from visual-language reasoning to omnimodal reasoning and (ii) from multimodal reasoning to multimodal agents. This survey aims to provide a structured overview that will inspire further advancements in multimodal reasoning research.

Related papers

• Why Reasoning Matters? A Survey of Advancements in Multimodal Reasoning (v1) [66.51642638034822]
  Reasoning is central to human intelligence, enabling structured problem-solving across diverse tasks. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced their reasoning abilities in arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic domains. This paper offers a concise yet insightful overview of reasoning techniques in both textual and multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T04:04:56Z)
• Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey [124.23247710880008]
  multimodal CoT (MCoT) reasoning has recently garnered significant research attention.<n>Existing MCoT studies design various methodologies to address the challenges of image, video, speech, audio, 3D, and structured data.<n>We present the first systematic survey of MCoT reasoning, elucidating the relevant foundational concepts and definitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T18:39:13Z)
• R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization [26.757458496178437]
  We introduce R1-Onevision, a multimodal reasoning model designed to bridge the gap between visual perception and deep reasoning.<n>We construct the R1-Onevision dataset which provides detailed, step-by-step multimodal reasoning annotations across diverse domains.<n>We further develop the R1-Onevision model through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning to cultivate advanced reasoning.<n> Experimental results show that R1-Onevision achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming models such as GPT-4o and Qwen2.5-VL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T17:56:05Z)
• Investigating Inference-time Scaling for Chain of Multi-modal Thought: A Preliminary Study [44.35454088618666]
  We investigate popular sampling-based and tree search-based inference-time scaling methods on 10 challenging tasks spanning various domains.<n>Results show that multi-modal thought promotes better performance against conventional text-only thought.<n>Despite these advantages, multi-modal thoughts necessitate higher token consumption for processing richer visual inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T07:29:01Z)
• LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Logical Inference in Large Language Model Reasoning [49.58786377307728]
  This paper adopts an exploratory approach by introducing a controlled evaluation environment for analogical reasoning.<n>We analyze the comparative dynamics of inductive, abductive, and deductive inference pipelines.<n>We investigate advanced paradigms such as hypothesis selection, verification, and refinement, revealing their potential to scale up logical inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:54:53Z)
• Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark [73.27104042215207]
  We introduce EMMA, a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding.<n>EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T18:55:52Z)
• Insight-V: Exploring Long-Chain Visual Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Models [64.1799100754406]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate enhanced capabilities and reliability by reasoning more. Despite various efforts to improve LLM reasoning, high-quality long-chain reasoning data and optimized training pipelines still remain inadequately explored in vision-language tasks. We present Insight-V, an early effort to 1) scalably produce long and robust reasoning data for complex multi-modal tasks, and 2) an effective training pipeline to enhance the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T18:59:55Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)
• DDCoT: Duty-Distinct Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Multimodal Reasoning in Language Models [28.712359821231182]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in such multi-step reasoning on the language modality solely by leveraging the chain of thought (CoT) to mimic human thinking. The transfer of these advancements to multimodal contexts introduces heightened challenges, including but not limited to the impractical need for labor-intensive annotation. This study proposes a novel DDCoT prompting that maintains a critical attitude through negative-space prompting and incorporates multimodality into reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T08:03:10Z)
• Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate [95.10641301155232]
  We present a complementary approach to improve language responses where multiple language model instances propose and debate their individual responses and reasoning processes over multiple rounds to arrive at a common final answer. Our findings indicate that this approach significantly enhances mathematical and strategic reasoning across a number of tasks. Our approach may be directly applied to existing black-box models and uses identical procedure and prompts for all tasks we investigate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:55:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.