Quantifying Symptom Causality in Clinical Decision Making: An Exploration Using CausaLM
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19394v1
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 06:59:21 GMT
- Title: Quantifying Symptom Causality in Clinical Decision Making: An Exploration Using CausaLM
- Abstract summary: Current machine learning approaches to medical diagnosis often rely on correlational patterns between symptoms and diseases.<n>In this work, we move beyond correlation to investigate the causal influence of key symptoms-specifically "chest pain" on diagnostic predictions.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Current machine learning approaches to medical diagnosis often rely on correlational patterns between symptoms and diseases, risking misdiagnoses when symptoms are ambiguous or common across multiple conditions. In this work, we move beyond correlation to investigate the causal influence of key symptoms-specifically "chest pain" on diagnostic predictions. Leveraging the CausaLM framework, we generate counterfactual text representations in which target concepts are effectively "forgotten" enabling a principled estimation of the causal effect of that concept on a model's predicted disease distribution. By employing Textual Representation-based Average Treatment Effect (TReATE), we quantify how the presence or absence of a symptom shapes the model's diagnostic outcomes, and contrast these findings against correlation-based baselines such as CONEXP. Our results offer deeper insight into the decision-making behavior of clinical NLP models and have the potential to inform more trustworthy, interpretable, and causally-grounded decision support tools in medical practice.
Related papers
- SUP-MIMIC: A Multi-Task Clinical Diagnosis Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs' Robustness to Contradictory Evidence [27.184935350216715]
Existing benchmarks fail to assess whether large language models truly possess the reasoning capability required for diagnostic ambiguity scenarios.<n>We propose SUP-MIMIC, a multi-task framework utilizing MIMIC-IV-v3.1 that comprises Basic Assessment (BA), Diagnostic Divergence Task (DDT), and Diagnostic Convergence Task (DCT)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-30T05:59:47Z) - From Static Risk to Dynamic Trajectories: Toward World-Model-Inspired Clinical Prediction [61.12883122613684]
This Review focuses on intervention-aware disease trajectory modeling in clinical AI--methods estimating patient-specific longitudinal disease evolution and assessing trajectory changes under alternative treatments.<n>We organize the field around six linked components: three decision tasks (factual forecasting, counterfactual estimation, policy evaluation) and three data-generating mechanisms (disease evolution, treatment assignment, observation process) that determine identifiability.<n>We present the first unified framework bridging forecasting, counterfactual trajectories, and policy evaluation across discrete/continuous time, explicitly addressing treatment assignment, time-varying confounding, and observation bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-16T10:45:26Z) - Medical Model Synthesis Architectures: A Case Study [72.46211022258122]
Current AI systems struggle with calibrated reasoning under uncertainty.<n>We propose a framework for AI systems that can make practically useful but formally transparent clinical predictions under uncertainty.<n>We show how an initial proof-of-concept of this framework can be used for differential diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T19:30:16Z) - MultiDx: A Multi-Source Knowledge Integration Framework towards Diagnostic Reasoning [66.94527468532843]
We propose MultiDx, a two-stage diagnostic reasoning framework.<n>It first generates suspected diagnoses and reasoning paths by leveraging knowledge from web search, SOAP-formatted case, and clinical case database.<n>Then it integrates multi-perspective evidence through matching, voting, and differential diagnosis to generate the final prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T08:46:29Z) - Clinical Cognition Alignment for Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Multimodal LLMs [63.535652574541764]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in medical image analysis.<n>Their application in gastrointestinal endoscopy is currently hindered by two critical limitations.<n>We propose a novel Clinical-Cognitive-Aligned (CogAlign) framework to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-21T07:47:37Z) - Making medical vision-language models think causally across modalities with retrieval-augmented cross-modal reasoning [16.243806723551454]
Medical vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance in diagnostic reporting and image-text alignment.<n>Their underlying reasoning mechanisms remain fundamentally correlational, exhibiting reliance on superficial statistical associations.<n>We propose Multimodal Causal Retrieval-Augmented Generation, a framework that integrates causal inference principles with multimodal retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T11:03:00Z) - MedEinst: Benchmarking the Einstellung Effect in Medical LLMs through Counterfactual Differential Diagnosis [13.241795322837861]
We introduce MedEinst, a counterfactual benchmark with 5,383 paired clinical cases across 49 diseases.<n>We measure susceptibility via Bias Trap Rate--probability of misdiagnosing traps despite correctly diagnosing controls.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-10T17:39:25Z) - Beyond Traditional Diagnostics: Transforming Patient-Side Information into Predictive Insights with Knowledge Graphs and Prototypes [55.310195121276074]
We propose a Knowledge graph-enhanced, Prototype-aware, and Interpretable (KPI) framework to predict diseases.<n>It integrates structured and trusted medical knowledge into a unified disease knowledge graph, constructs clinically meaningful disease prototypes, and employs contrastive learning to enhance predictive accuracy.<n>It provides clinically valid explanations that closely align with patient narratives, highlighting its practical value for patient-centered healthcare delivery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T05:37:54Z) - Cross-modal Causal Intervention for Alzheimer's Disease Prediction [12.485088483891843]
We propose a visual-language causal intervention framework named Alzheimer's Disease Prediction with Cross-modal Causal Intervention.<n>Our framework implicitly eliminates confounders through causal intervention.<n> Experimental results demonstrate the outstanding performance of our method in distinguishing CN/MCI/AD cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-18T14:21:24Z) - An Explainable Diagnostic Framework for Neurodegenerative Dementias via Reinforcement-Optimized LLM Reasoning [1.5646349560044959]
We propose a framework that integrates two core components to enhance diagnostic transparency.<n>First, we introduce a modular pipeline for converting 3D T1-weighted brain MRIs into textual radiology reports.<n>Second, we explore the potential of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist clinicians in the differential diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T13:18:32Z) - Uncertainty-aware abstention in medical diagnosis based on medical texts [87.88110503208016]
This study addresses the critical issue of reliability for AI-assisted medical diagnosis.
We focus on the selection prediction approach that allows the diagnosis system to abstain from providing the decision if it is not confident in the diagnosis.
We introduce HUQ-2, a new state-of-the-art method for enhancing reliability in selective prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T10:15:21Z) - Research on the Proximity Relationships of Psychosomatic Disease Knowledge Graph Modules Extracted by Large Language Models [15.497329016495677]
Psychosomatic disorders are a major challenge in global health issues.<n>We establish the BERT model and entity types, constructing the knowledge graph with 9668 triples.<n>By analyzing the network distances between disease, symptom, and drug modules, it was found that closer network distances among diseases can predict greater similarities in their clinical manifestations, treatment approaches, and psychological mechanisms, and closer distances between symptoms indicate that they are more likely to co-occur.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-24T13:24:01Z) - Fair Diagnosis: Leveraging Causal Modeling to Mitigate Medical Bias [14.848344916632024]
In medical image analysis, model predictions can be affected by sensitive attributes, such as race and gender.<n>We present a causal modeling framework, which aims to reduce the impact of sensitive attributes on diagnostic predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T02:59:36Z) - Towards the Identifiability and Explainability for Personalized Learner
Modeling: An Inductive Paradigm [36.60917255464867]
We propose an identifiable cognitive diagnosis framework (ID-CDF) based on a novel response-proficiency-response paradigm inspired by encoder-decoder models.
We show that ID-CDF can effectively address the problems without loss of diagnosis preciseness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T07:18:02Z) - CTP:A Causal Interpretable Model for Non-Communicable Disease
Progression Prediction [12.282670150417953]
We propose a novel model called causal trajectory prediction (CTP) to tackle the limitation.
CTP combines trajectory prediction and causal discovery to enable accurate prediction of disease progression trajectories.
We evaluate the performance of the model using simulated and real medical datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-18T06:58:31Z) - Explorative analysis of human disease-symptoms relations using the
Convolutional Neural Network [0.0]
This study aims to understand the extent of symptom types in disease prediction tasks.
Our results indicate that machine learning can potentially diagnose diseases with the 98-100% accuracy in the early stage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T15:02:07Z) - Bayesian Networks for the robust and unbiased prediction of depression
and its symptoms utilizing speech and multimodal data [65.28160163774274]
We apply a Bayesian framework to capture the relationships between depression, depression symptoms, and features derived from speech, facial expression and cognitive game data collected at thymia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-09T14:48:13Z) - Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of
Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem.
Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools.
We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z) - What Do You See in this Patient? Behavioral Testing of Clinical NLP
Models [69.09570726777817]
We introduce an extendable testing framework that evaluates the behavior of clinical outcome models regarding changes of the input.
We show that model behavior varies drastically even when fine-tuned on the same data and that allegedly best-performing models have not always learned the most medically plausible patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-30T15:52:04Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - Inheritance-guided Hierarchical Assignment for Clinical Automatic
Diagnosis [50.15205065710629]
Clinical diagnosis, which aims to assign diagnosis codes for a patient based on the clinical note, plays an essential role in clinical decision-making.
We propose a novel framework to combine the inheritance-guided hierarchical assignment and co-occurrence graph propagation for clinical automatic diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-27T13:16:51Z) - Uncertainty aware and explainable diagnosis of retinal disease [0.0]
We perform uncertainty analysis of a deep learning model for diagnosis of four retinal diseases.
We show the features that a system used to make prediction while uncertainty awareness is the ability of a system to highlight when it is not sure about the decision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-26T23:37:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.