Active Data Sampling and Generation for Bias Remediation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20414v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:42:15 GMT
• Title: Active Data Sampling and Generation for Bias Remediation
• Authors: Antonio Maratea, Rita Perna,
• Abstract summary: A mixed active sampling and data generation strategy -- called samplation -- is proposed to compensate during fine-tuning of a pre-trained classifer the unfair classifications it produces.<n>Using as case study Deep Models for visual semantic role labeling, the proposed method has been able to fully cure a simulated gender bias starting from a 90/10 imbalance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Adequate sampling space coverage is the keystone to effectively train trustworthy Machine Learning models. Unfortunately, real data do carry several inherent risks due to the many potential biases they exhibit when gathered without a proper random sampling over the reference population, and most of the times this is way too expensive or time consuming to be a viable option. Depending on how training data have been gathered, unmitigated biases can lead to harmful or discriminatory consequences that ultimately hinders large scale applicability of pre-trained models and undermine their truthfulness or fairness expectations. In this paper, a mixed active sampling and data generation strategy -- called samplation -- is proposed as a mean to compensate during fine-tuning of a pre-trained classifer the unfair classifications it produces, assuming that the training data come from a non-probabilistic sampling schema. Given a pre-trained classifier, first a fairness metric is evaluated on a test set, then new reservoirs of labeled data are generated and finally a number of reversely-biased artificial samples are generated for the fine-tuning of the model. Using as case study Deep Models for visual semantic role labeling, the proposed method has been able to fully cure a simulated gender bias starting from a 90/10 imbalance, with only a small percentage of new data and with a minor effect on accuracy.

Related papers

• Challenges learning from imbalanced data using tree-based models: Prevalence estimates systematically depend on hyperparameters and can be upwardly biased [0.0]
  Imbalanced binary classification problems arise in many fields of study.<n>It is common to subsample the majority class to create a (more) balanced dataset for model training.<n>This biases the model's predictions because the model learns from a dataset that does not follow the same data generating process as new data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T19:38:29Z)
• Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection [82.43311784594384]
  Real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. We propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T10:34:53Z)
• An Efficient Rehearsal Scheme for Catastrophic Forgetting Mitigation during Multi-stage Fine-tuning [55.467047686093025]
  A common approach to alleviate such forgetting is to rehearse samples from prior tasks during fine-tuning.<n>We propose a sampling scheme, textttbf mix-cd, that prioritizes rehearsal of collateral damage'' samples.<n>Our approach is computationally efficient, easy to implement, and outperforms several leading continual learning methods in compute-constrained settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T22:32:12Z)
• Twice Class Bias Correction for Imbalanced Semi-Supervised Learning [59.90429949214134]
  We introduce a novel approach called textbfTwice textbfClass textbfBias textbfCorrection (textbfTCBC) We estimate the class bias of the model parameters during the training process. We apply a secondary correction to the model's pseudo-labels for unlabeled samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T15:06:36Z)
• Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning [54.32026474971696]
  Deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios. Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training. We propose a fast model debiasing framework (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T08:10:57Z)
• From Fake to Real: Pretraining on Balanced Synthetic Images to Prevent Spurious Correlations in Image Recognition [64.59093444558549]
  We propose a simple, easy-to-implement, two-step training pipeline that we call From Fake to Real. By training on real and synthetic data separately, FFR does not expose the model to the statistical differences between real and synthetic data. Our experiments show that FFR improves worst group accuracy over the state-of-the-art by up to 20% over three datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T19:52:28Z)
• Provable Detection of Propagating Sampling Bias in Prediction Models [1.7709344190822935]
  We provide a theoretical analysis of how a specific form of data bias, differential sampling bias, propagates from the data stage to the prediction stage. Under reasonable assumptions, we quantify how the amount of bias in the model predictions varies as a function of the amount of differential sampling bias in the data. We demonstrate that the theoretical results hold in practice even when our assumptions are relaxed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T23:39:35Z)
• On Comparing Fair Classifiers under Data Bias [42.43344286660331]
  We study the effect of varying data biases on the accuracy and fairness of fair classifiers. Our experiments show how to integrate a measure of data bias risk in the existing fairness dashboards for real-world deployments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-12T13:04:46Z)
• Open-Sampling: Exploring Out-of-Distribution data for Re-balancing Long-tailed datasets [24.551465814633325]
  Deep neural networks usually perform poorly when the training dataset suffers from extreme class imbalance. Recent studies found that directly training with out-of-distribution data in a semi-supervised manner would harm the generalization performance. We propose a novel method called Open-sampling, which utilizes open-set noisy labels to re-balance the class priors of the training dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T14:29:52Z)
• Bayesian analysis of the prevalence bias: learning and predicting from imbalanced data [10.659348599372944]
  This paper lays the theoretical and computational framework for training models, and for prediction, in the presence of prevalence bias. It offers an alternative to principled training losses and complements test-time procedures based on selecting an operating point from summary curves. It integrates seamlessly in the current paradigm of (deep) learning using backpropagation and naturally with Bayesian models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-31T14:36:33Z)
• Robust Fairness-aware Learning Under Sample Selection Bias [17.09665420515772]
  We propose a framework for robust and fair learning under sample selection bias. We develop two algorithms to handle sample selection bias when test data is both available and unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T23:23:36Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Understanding Classifier Mistakes with Generative Models [88.20470690631372]
  Deep neural networks are effective on supervised learning tasks, but have been shown to be brittle. In this paper, we leverage generative models to identify and characterize instances where classifiers fail to generalize. Our approach is agnostic to class labels from the training set which makes it applicable to models trained in a semi-supervised way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T22:13:21Z)
• Improving Maximum Likelihood Training for Text Generation with Density Ratio Estimation [51.091890311312085]
  We propose a new training scheme for auto-regressive sequence generative models, which is effective and stable when operating at large sample space encountered in text generation. Our method stably outperforms Maximum Likelihood Estimation and other state-of-the-art sequence generative models in terms of both quality and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-12T15:31:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.