Robust Fairness-aware Learning Under Sample Selection Bias

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11570v1
• Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 23:23:36 GMT
• Title: Robust Fairness-aware Learning Under Sample Selection Bias
• Authors: Wei Du and Xintao Wu
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework for robust and fair learning under sample selection bias. We develop two algorithms to handle sample selection bias when test data is both available and unavailable.
• Score: 17.09665420515772
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The underlying assumption of many machine learning algorithms is that the training data and test data are drawn from the same distributions. However, the assumption is often violated in real world due to the sample selection bias between the training and test data. Previous research works focus on reweighing biased training data to match the test data and then building classification models on the reweighed training data. However, how to achieve fairness in the built classification models is under-explored. In this paper, we propose a framework for robust and fair learning under sample selection bias. Our framework adopts the reweighing estimation approach for bias correction and the minimax robust estimation approach for achieving robustness on prediction accuracy. Moreover, during the minimax optimization, the fairness is achieved under the worst case, which guarantees the model's fairness on test data. We further develop two algorithms to handle sample selection bias when test data is both available and unavailable. We conduct experiments on two real-world datasets and the experimental results demonstrate its effectiveness in terms of both utility and fairness metrics.

Related papers

• Debiased Sample Selection for Combating Noisy Labels [24.296451733127956]
  We propose a noIse-Tolerant Expert Model (ITEM) for debiased learning in sample selection. Specifically, to mitigate the training bias, we design a robust network architecture that integrates with multiple experts. By training on the mixture of two class-discriminative mini-batches, the model mitigates the effect of the imbalanced training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T10:37:28Z)
• Provable Detection of Propagating Sampling Bias in Prediction Models [1.7709344190822935]
  We provide a theoretical analysis of how a specific form of data bias, differential sampling bias, propagates from the data stage to the prediction stage. Under reasonable assumptions, we quantify how the amount of bias in the model predictions varies as a function of the amount of differential sampling bias in the data. We demonstrate that the theoretical results hold in practice even when our assumptions are relaxed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T23:39:35Z)
• Revisiting Long-tailed Image Classification: Survey and Benchmarks with New Evaluation Metrics [88.39382177059747]
  A corpus of metrics is designed for measuring the accuracy, robustness, and bounds of algorithms for learning with long-tailed distribution. Based on our benchmarks, we re-evaluate the performance of existing methods on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T02:40:54Z)
• DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptation [59.74287982885375]
  We find that two unfavorable defects are concealed in the prevalent adaptation methodologies like test-time batch normalization (BN) and self-learning. First, we reveal that the normalization statistics in test-time BN are completely affected by the currently received test samples, resulting in inaccurate estimates. Second, we show that during test-time adaptation, the parameter update is biased towards some dominant classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T15:54:00Z)
• Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding [86.8751772146264]
  Existing natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases to achieve high performance on specific datasets. We propose debiasing contrastive learning (DCT) to mitigate biased latent features and neglect the dynamic nature of bias. DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-11T06:16:14Z)
• Simultaneous Improvement of ML Model Fairness and Performance by Identifying Bias in Data [1.76179873429447]
  We propose a data preprocessing technique that can detect instances ascribing a specific kind of bias that should be removed from the dataset before training. In particular, we claim that in the problem settings where instances exist with similar feature but different labels caused by variation in protected attributes, an inherent bias gets induced in the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T13:04:07Z)
• Conformal prediction for the design problem [72.14982816083297]
  In many real-world deployments of machine learning, we use a prediction algorithm to choose what data to test next. In such settings, there is a distinct type of distribution shift between the training and test data. We introduce a method to quantify predictive uncertainty in such settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T02:59:12Z)
• FairIF: Boosting Fairness in Deep Learning via Influence Functions with Validation Set Sensitive Attributes [51.02407217197623]
  We propose a two-stage training algorithm named FAIRIF. It minimizes the loss over the reweighted data set where the sample weights are computed. We show that FAIRIF yields models with better fairness-utility trade-offs against various types of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T05:14:48Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Managing dataset shift by adversarial validation for credit scoring [5.560471251954645]
  The inconsistency between the distribution of training data and the data that actually needs to be predicted is likely to cause poor model performance. We propose a method based on adversarial validation to alleviate the dataset shift problem in credit scoring scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T07:07:15Z)
• Robust Fairness under Covariate Shift [11.151913007808927]
  Making predictions that are fair with regard to protected group membership has become an important requirement for classification algorithms. We propose an approach that obtains the predictor that is robust to the worst-case in terms of target performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-11T04:42:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.