Function Alignment: A New Theory of Mind and Intelligence, Part I: Foundations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21106v4
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:44:55 GMT
• Title: Function Alignment: A New Theory of Mind and Intelligence, Part I: Foundations
• Authors: Gus G. Xia,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces function alignment, a novel theory of mind and intelligence.<n>It explicitly models how meaning, interpretation, and analogy emerge from interactions among layered representations.<n>It bridges disciplines often kept apart, linking computational architecture, psychological theory, and even contemplative traditions such as Zen.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces function alignment, a novel theory of mind and intelligence that is both intuitively compelling and structurally grounded. It explicitly models how meaning, interpretation, and analogy emerge from interactions among layered representations, forming a coherent framework capable not only of modeling minds but also of serving as a blueprint for building them. One of the key theoretical insights derived from function alignment is bounded interpretability, which provides a unified explanation for previously fragmented ideas in cognitive science, such as bounded rationality, symbol grounding, and analogy-making. Beyond modeling, the function alignment framework bridges disciplines often kept apart, linking computational architecture, psychological theory, and even contemplative traditions such as Zen. Rather than building on any philosophical systems, it offers a structural foundation upon which multiple ways of understanding the mind may be reconstructed.

Related papers

• Theoretical Foundations for Semantic Cognition in Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  monograph presents a modular cognitive architecture for artificial intelligence grounded in the formal modeling of belief as structured semantic state. Belief states are defined as dynamic ensembles of linguistic expressions embedded within a navigable manifold, where operators enable assimilation, abstraction, nullification, memory, and introspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T23:10:07Z)
• A Complexity-Based Theory of Compositionality [53.025566128892066]
  In AI, compositional representations can enable a powerful form of out-of-distribution generalization.<n>Here, we propose a formal definition of compositionality that accounts for and extends our intuitions about compositionality.<n>The definition is conceptually simple, quantitative, grounded in algorithmic information theory, and applicable to any representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T18:37:27Z)
• What Machine Learning Tells Us About the Mathematical Structure of Concepts [0.0]
  The study highlights how each framework provides a distinct mathematical perspective for modeling concepts. This work emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary dialogue, aiming to enrich our understanding of the complex relationship between human cognition and artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T03:30:22Z)
• Fundamental Components of Deep Learning: A category-theoretic approach [0.0]
  This thesis develops a novel mathematical foundation for deep learning based on the language of category theory. We also systematise many existing approaches, placing many existing constructions and concepts under the same umbrella.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T01:29:40Z)
• Pregeometry, Formal Language and Constructivist Foundations of Physics [0.0]
  We discuss the metaphysics of pregeometric structures, upon which new and existing notions of quantum geometry may find a foundation. We draw attention to evidence suggesting that the framework of formal language, in particular, homotopy type theory, provides the conceptual building blocks for a theory of pregeometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T13:19:29Z)
• From Word Models to World Models: Translating from Natural Language to the Probabilistic Language of Thought [124.40905824051079]
  We propose rational meaning construction, a computational framework for language-informed thinking. We frame linguistic meaning as a context-sensitive mapping from natural language into a probabilistic language of thought. We show that LLMs can generate context-sensitive translations that capture pragmatically-appropriate linguistic meanings. We extend our framework to integrate cognitively-motivated symbolic modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T05:14:00Z)
• Minding Language Models' (Lack of) Theory of Mind: A Plug-and-Play Multi-Character Belief Tracker [72.09076317574238]
  ToM is a plug-and-play approach to investigate the belief states of characters in reading comprehension. We show that ToM enhances off-the-shelf neural network theory mind in a zero-order setting while showing robust out-of-distribution performance compared to supervised baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T17:24:35Z)
• Kernel Based Cognitive Architecture for Autonomous Agents [91.3755431537592]
  This paper considers an evolutionary approach to creating a cognitive functionality. We consider a cognitive architecture which ensures the evolution of the agent on the basis of Symbol Emergence Problem solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T12:41:32Z)
• pix2rule: End-to-end Neuro-symbolic Rule Learning [84.76439511271711]
  This paper presents a complete neuro-symbolic method for processing images into objects, learning relations and logical rules. The main contribution is a differentiable layer in a deep learning architecture from which symbolic relations and rules can be extracted. We demonstrate that our model scales beyond state-of-the-art symbolic learners and outperforms deep relational neural network architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T15:19:06Z)
• Interpretable Reinforcement Learning Inspired by Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development [1.7778609937758327]
  This paper entertains the idea that theories such as language of thought hypothesis (LOTH), script theory, and Piaget's cognitive development theory provide complementary approaches. The proposed framework can be viewed as a step towards achieving human-like cognition in artificial intelligent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-01T00:29:01Z)
• Formalising Concepts as Grounded Abstractions [68.24080871981869]
  This report shows how representation learning can be used to induce concepts from raw data. The main technical goal of this report is to show how techniques from representation learning can be married with a lattice-theoretic formulation of conceptual spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T15:22:01Z)
• Modelling Compositionality and Structure Dependence in Natural Language [0.12183405753834563]
  Drawing on linguistics and set theory, a formalisation of these ideas is presented in the first half of this thesis. We see how cognitive systems that process language need to have certain functional constraints. Using the advances of word embedding techniques, a model of relational learning is simulated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-22T17:28:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.