You Cannot Feed Two Birds with One Score: the Accuracy-Naturalness Tradeoff in Translation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.24013v2
• Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 08:31:40 GMT
• Title: You Cannot Feed Two Birds with One Score: the Accuracy-Naturalness Tradeoff in Translation
• Authors: Gergely Flamich, David Vilar, Jan-Thorsten Peter, Markus Freitag,
• Abstract summary: We build on recent advances in information theory to mathematically prove and empirically demonstrate that such single-score summaries do not and cannot give the complete picture of a system's true performance.<n>Our findings help explain well-known empirical phenomena, such as the observation that optimizing translation systems for a specific accuracy metric (like BLEU) initially improves the system's naturalness, while overfitting'' the system to the metric can significantly degrade its naturalness.
• Score: 21.568606037252774
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The goal of translation, be it by human or by machine, is, given some text in a source language, to produce text in a target language that simultaneously 1) preserves the meaning of the source text and 2) achieves natural expression in the target language. However, researchers in the machine translation community usually assess translations using a single score intended to capture semantic accuracy and the naturalness of the output simultaneously. In this paper, we build on recent advances in information theory to mathematically prove and empirically demonstrate that such single-score summaries do not and cannot give the complete picture of a system's true performance. Concretely, we prove that a tradeoff exists between accuracy and naturalness and demonstrate it by evaluating the submissions to the WMT24 shared task. Our findings help explain well-known empirical phenomena, such as the observation that optimizing translation systems for a specific accuracy metric (like BLEU) initially improves the system's naturalness, while ``overfitting'' the system to the metric can significantly degrade its naturalness. Thus, we advocate for a change in how translations are evaluated: rather than comparing systems using a single number, they should be compared on an accuracy-naturalness plane.

Related papers

• Multi-perspective Alignment for Increasing Naturalness in Neural Machine Translation [11.875491080062233]
  Neural machine translation (NMT) systems amplify lexical biases present in their training data, leading to artificially impoverished language in output translations.<n>We introduce a novel method that rewards both naturalness and content preservation.<n>We evaluate our method on English-to-Dutch literary translation, and find that our best model produces translations that are lexically richer and exhibit more properties of human-written language, without loss in translation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T15:42:22Z)
• Prosody in Cascade and Direct Speech-to-Text Translation: a case study on Korean Wh-Phrases [79.07111754406841]
  This work proposes using contrastive evaluation to measure the ability of direct S2TT systems to disambiguate utterances where prosody plays a crucial role. Our results clearly demonstrate the value of direct translation systems over cascade translation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T14:46:35Z)
• Crossing the Threshold: Idiomatic Machine Translation through Retrieval Augmentation and Loss Weighting [66.02718577386426]
  We provide a simple characterization of idiomatic translation and related issues. We conduct a synthetic experiment revealing a tipping point at which transformer-based machine translation models correctly default to idiomatic translations. To improve translation of natural idioms, we introduce two straightforward yet effective techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T23:47:25Z)
• Rethinking Round-Trip Translation for Machine Translation Evaluation [44.83568796515321]
  We report the surprising finding that round-trip translation can be used for automatic evaluation without the references. We demonstrate the rectification is overdue as round-trip translation could benefit multiple machine translation evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T15:06:20Z)
• Towards Debiasing Translation Artifacts [15.991970288297443]
  We propose a novel approach to reducing translationese by extending an established bias-removal technique. We use the Iterative Null-space Projection (INLP) algorithm, and show by measuring classification accuracy before and after debiasing, that translationese is reduced at both sentence and word level. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to debias translationese as represented in latent embedding space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T21:46:51Z)
• Bridging the Data Gap between Training and Inference for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation [49.916963624249355]
  A UNMT model is trained on the pseudo parallel data with translated source, and natural source sentences in inference. The source discrepancy between training and inference hinders the translation performance of UNMT models. We propose an online self-training approach, which simultaneously uses the pseudo parallel data natural source, translated target to mimic the inference scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T04:50:27Z)
• Modelling Latent Translations for Cross-Lingual Transfer [47.61502999819699]
  We propose a new technique that integrates both steps of the traditional pipeline (translation and classification) into a single model. We evaluate our novel latent translation-based model on a series of multilingual NLU tasks. We report gains for both zero-shot and few-shot learning setups, up to 2.7 accuracy points on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T17:11:27Z)
• On the Language Coverage Bias for Neural Machine Translation [81.81456880770762]
  Language coverage bias is important for neural machine translation (NMT) because the target-original training data is not well exploited in current practice. By carefully designing experiments, we provide comprehensive analyses of the language coverage bias in the training data. We propose two simple and effective approaches to alleviate the language coverage bias problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T01:55:34Z)
• SemMT: A Semantic-based Testing Approach for Machine Translation Systems [11.166336490280749]
  We propose SemMT, an automatic testing approach for machine translation systems based on semantic similarity checking. SemMT applies round-trip translation and measures the semantic similarity between the original and translated sentences. We show SemMT can achieve higher effectiveness compared with state-of-the-art works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T10:42:56Z)
• Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale [52.663117551150954]
  A few popular metrics remain as the de facto metrics to evaluate tasks such as image captioning and machine translation. This is partly due to ease of use, and partly because researchers expect to see them and know how to interpret them. In this paper, we urge the community for more careful consideration of how they automatically evaluate their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T13:57:20Z)
• Syntactic Structure Distillation Pretraining For Bidirectional Encoders [49.483357228441434]
  We introduce a knowledge distillation strategy for injecting syntactic biases into BERT pretraining. We distill the approximate marginal distribution over words in context from the syntactic LM. Our findings demonstrate the benefits of syntactic biases, even in representation learners that exploit large amounts of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T16:44:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.