Language Models at the Syntax-Semantics Interface: A Case Study of the Long-Distance Binding of Chinese Reflexive ziji

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02116v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 20:25:27 GMT
• Title: Language Models at the Syntax-Semantics Interface: A Case Study of the Long-Distance Binding of Chinese Reflexive ziji
• Authors: Xiulin Yang,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores whether language models can effectively resolve the complex binding patterns of the Mandarin Chinese reflexive ziji.<n>We construct a dataset of 240 synthetic sentences using templates and examples from syntactic literature, along with 320 natural sentences from the BCC corpus.<n>We find that none of the models consistently replicates human-like judgments.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper explores whether language models can effectively resolve the complex binding patterns of the Mandarin Chinese reflexive ziji, which are constrained by both syntactic and semantic factors. We construct a dataset of 240 synthetic sentences using templates and examples from syntactic literature, along with 320 natural sentences from the BCC corpus. Evaluating 21 language models against this dataset and comparing their performance to judgments from native Mandarin speakers, we find that none of the models consistently replicates human-like judgments. The results indicate that existing language models tend to rely heavily on sequential cues, though not always favoring the closest strings, and often overlooking subtle semantic and syntactic constraints. They tend to be more sensitive to noun-related than verb-related semantics.

Related papers

• Exploring syntactic information in sentence embeddings through multilingual subject-verb agreement [1.4335183427838039]
  We take the approach of developing curated synthetic data on a large scale, with specific properties.<n>We use a new multiple-choice task and datasets, Blackbird Language Matrices, to focus on a specific grammatical structural phenomenon.<n>We show that despite having been trained on multilingual texts in a consistent manner, multilingual pretrained language models have language-specific differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T14:58:55Z)
• Large Language Models can Contrastively Refine their Generation for Better Sentence Representation Learning [57.74233319453229]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a groundbreaking technology and their unparalleled text generation capabilities have sparked interest in their application to the fundamental sentence representation learning task. We propose MultiCSR, a multi-level contrastive sentence representation learning framework that decomposes the process of prompting LLMs to generate a corpus. Our experiments reveal that MultiCSR enables a less advanced LLM to surpass the performance of ChatGPT, while applying it to ChatGPT achieves better state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T03:21:43Z)
• JCoLA: Japanese Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability [3.6141428739228902]
  We introduce JCoLA (Japanese Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability), which consists of 10,020 sentences annotated with binary acceptability judgments. We then evaluate the syntactic knowledge of 9 different types of Japanese language models on JCoLA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T07:35:45Z)
• Syntax and Semantics Meet in the "Middle": Probing the Syntax-Semantics Interface of LMs Through Agentivity [68.8204255655161]
  We present the semantic notion of agentivity as a case study for probing such interactions. This suggests LMs may potentially serve as more useful tools for linguistic annotation, theory testing, and discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T16:24:01Z)
• Language model acceptability judgements are not always robust to context [30.868765627701457]
  We investigate the stability of language models' performance on targeted syntactic evaluations. We find that model judgements are generally robust when placed in randomly sampled linguistic contexts. We show that these changes in model performance are not explainable by simple features matching the context and the test inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-18T00:11:06Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsing [55.058258437125524]
  We introduce BenchCLAMP, a Benchmark to evaluate Constrained LAnguage Model Parsing. We benchmark eight language models, including two GPT-3 variants available only through an API. Our experiments show that encoder-decoder pretrained language models can achieve similar performance or surpass state-of-the-art methods for syntactic and semantic parsing when the model output is constrained to be valid.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T18:34:11Z)
• Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanations [99.7035899290924]
  Language models must consider various features to predict a token, such as its part of speech, number, tense, or semantics. Existing explanation methods conflate evidence for all these features into a single explanation, which is less interpretable for human understanding. We show that contrastive explanations are quantifiably better than non-contrastive explanations in verifying major grammatical phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:32:24Z)
• On The Ingredients of an Effective Zero-shot Semantic Parser [95.01623036661468]
  We analyze zero-shot learning by paraphrasing training examples of canonical utterances and programs from a grammar. We propose bridging these gaps using improved grammars, stronger paraphrasers, and efficient learning methods. Our model achieves strong performance on two semantic parsing benchmarks (Scholar, Geo) with zero labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T21:41:16Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
• Constructing a Family Tree of Ten Indo-European Languages with Delexicalized Cross-linguistic Transfer Patterns [57.86480614673034]
  We formalize the delexicalized transfer as interpretable tree-to-string and tree-to-tree patterns. This allows us to quantitatively probe cross-linguistic transfer and extend inquiries of Second Language Acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T15:56:54Z)
• Recurrent Neural Network Language Models Always Learn English-Like Relative Clause Attachment [17.995905582226463]
  We compare model performance in English and Spanish to show that non-linguistic biases in RNN LMs advantageously overlap with syntactic structure in English but not Spanish. English models may appear to acquire human-like syntactic preferences, while models trained on Spanish fail to acquire comparable human-like preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T01:21:47Z)
• Do Neural Language Models Show Preferences for Syntactic Formalisms? [14.388237635684737]
  We study the extent to which the semblance of syntactic structure captured by language models adheres to a surface-syntactic or deep syntactic style of analysis. We apply a probe for extracting directed dependency trees to BERT and ELMo models trained on 13 different languages. We find that both models exhibit a preference for UD over SUD - with interesting variations across languages and layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T11:37:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.