Improving User Experience with FAICO: Towards a Framework for AI Communication in Human-AI Co-Creativity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02526v1
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 12:29:53 GMT
- Title: Improving User Experience with FAICO: Towards a Framework for AI Communication in Human-AI Co-Creativity
- Authors: Jeba Rezwana, Corey Ford,
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces our initial design of a Framework for designing AI Communication (FAICO) for co-creative AI.<n>FAICO presents key aspects of AI communication and their impacts on user experience to guide the design of effective AI communication.<n>We show actionable ways to translate our framework into two practical tools: design cards for designers and a configuration tool for users.
- Score: 2.3020018305241337
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: How AI communicates with humans is crucial for effective human-AI co-creation. However, many existing co-creative AI tools cannot communicate effectively, limiting their potential as collaborators. This paper introduces our initial design of a Framework for designing AI Communication (FAICO) for co-creative AI based on a systematic review of 107 full-length papers. FAICO presents key aspects of AI communication and their impacts on user experience to guide the design of effective AI communication. We then show actionable ways to translate our framework into two practical tools: design cards for designers and a configuration tool for users. The design cards enable designers to consider AI communication strategies that cater to a diverse range of users in co-creative contexts, while the configuration tool empowers users to customize AI communication based on their needs and creative workflows. This paper contributes new insights within the literature on human-AI co-creativity and Human-Computer Interaction, focusing on designing AI communication to enhance user experience.
Related papers
- The AI Interface: Designing for the Ideal Machine-Human Experience (Editorial) [1.8074330674710588]
This editorial introduces a Special Issue that explores the psychology of AI experience design.<n>Papers in this collection highlight the complexities of trust, transparency, and emotional sensitivity in human-AI interaction.<n>By findings from eight diverse studies, this editorial underscores the need for AI interfaces to balance efficiency with empathy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T15:17:32Z) - Designing AI Personalities: Enhancing Human-Agent Interaction Through Thoughtful Persona Design [7.610735476681428]
This workshop aims to establish a research community focused on AI agent persona design for various contexts.
We will explore critical aspects of persona design, such as voice, embodiment, and demographics, and their impact on user satisfaction and engagement.
Topics include the design of conversational interfaces, the influence of agent personas on user experience, and approaches for creating contextually appropriate AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T06:58:59Z) - Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike.
We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z) - Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment [2.8078480738404]
Key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills.
This paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI.
Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T12:12:50Z) - Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps.
We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches.
We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z) - Understanding User Perceptions, Collaborative Experience and User
Engagement in Different Human-AI Interaction Designs for Co-Creative Systems [0.7614628596146599]
Human-AI co-creativity involves humans and AI collaborating on a shared creative product as partners.
In many existing co-creative systems users can communicate with the AI, usually using buttons or sliders.
This paper presents a study with 38 participants to explore the impact of two interaction designs on user engagement, collaborative experience and user perception of a co-creative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-27T22:37:44Z) - Identifying Ethical Issues in AI Partners in Human-AI Co-Creation [0.7614628596146599]
Human-AI co-creativity involves humans and AI collaborating on a shared creative product as partners.
In many existing co-creative systems, users communicate with the AI using buttons or sliders.
This paper explores the impact of AI-to-human communication on user perception and engagement in co-creative systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-15T20:41:54Z) - On some Foundational Aspects of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence [52.03866242565846]
There is no clear definition of what is meant by Human Centered Artificial Intelligence.
This paper introduces the term HCAI agent to refer to any physical or software computational agent equipped with AI components.
We see the notion of HCAI agent, together with its components and functions, as a way to bridge the technical and non-technical discussions on human-centered AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-29T09:58:59Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Joint Mind Modeling for Explanation Generation in Complex Human-Robot
Collaborative Tasks [83.37025218216888]
We propose a novel explainable AI (XAI) framework for achieving human-like communication in human-robot collaborations.
The robot builds a hierarchical mind model of the human user and generates explanations of its own mind as a form of communications.
Results show that the generated explanations of our approach significantly improves the collaboration performance and user perception of the robot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-24T23:35:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.