Reasoning Inconsistencies and How to Mitigate Them in Deep Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02577v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 13:40:55 GMT
• Title: Reasoning Inconsistencies and How to Mitigate Them in Deep Learning
• Authors: Erik Arakelyan,
• Abstract summary: This thesis contributes two techniques for detecting and quantifying predictive inconsistencies.<n>To mitigate inconsistencies from biases in training data, this thesis presents a data efficient sampling method.<n>Finally, the thesis offers two techniques to optimize the models for complex reasoning tasks.
• Score: 4.124590489579409
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The recent advancements in Deep Learning models and techniques have led to significant strides in performance across diverse tasks and modalities. However, while the overall capabilities of models show promising growth, our understanding of their internal reasoning processes remains limited, particularly concerning systematic inconsistencies or errors patterns of logical or inferential flaws. These inconsistencies may manifest as contradictory outputs, failure to generalize across similar tasks, or erroneous conclusions in specific contexts. Even detecting and measuring such reasoning discrepancies is challenging, as they may arise from opaque internal procedures, biases and imbalances in training data, or the inherent complexity of the task. Without effective methods to detect, measure, and mitigate these errors, there is a risk of deploying models that are biased, exploitable, or logically unreliable. This thesis aims to address these issues by producing novel methods for deep learning models that reason over knowledge graphs, natural language, and images. The thesis contributes two techniques for detecting and quantifying predictive inconsistencies originating from opaque internal procedures in natural language and image processing models. To mitigate inconsistencies from biases in training data, this thesis presents a data efficient sampling method to improve fairness and performance and a synthetic dataset generation approach in low resource scenarios. Finally, the thesis offers two techniques to optimize the models for complex reasoning tasks. These methods enhance model performance while allowing for more faithful and interpretable exploration and exploitation during inference. Critically, this thesis provides a comprehensive framework to improve the robustness, fairness, and interpretability of deep learning models across diverse tasks and modalities.

Related papers

• Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
  Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage.<n>Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes.<n> causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z)
• Pattern based learning and optimisation through pricing for bin packing problem [50.83768979636913]
  We argue that when problem conditions such as the distributions of random variables change, the patterns that performed well in previous circumstances may become less effective. We propose a novel scheme to efficiently identify patterns and dynamically quantify their values for each specific condition. Our method quantifies the value of patterns based on their ability to satisfy constraints and their effects on the objective value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T17:03:48Z)
• Model-Agnostic Interpretation Framework in Machine Learning: A Comparative Study in NBA Sports [0.2937071029942259]
  We propose an innovative framework to reconcile the trade-off between model performance and interpretability. Our approach is centered around modular operations on high-dimensional data, which enable end-to-end processing while preserving interpretability. We have extensively tested our framework and validated its superior efficacy in achieving a balance between computational efficiency and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T04:25:21Z)
• Consistent Explanations in the Face of Model Indeterminacy via Ensembling [12.661530681518899]
  This work addresses the challenge of providing consistent explanations for predictive models in the presence of model indeterminacy. We introduce ensemble methods to enhance the consistency of the explanations provided in these scenarios. Our findings highlight the importance of considering model indeterminacy when interpreting explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T18:45:43Z)
• GLUECons: A Generic Benchmark for Learning Under Constraints [102.78051169725455]
  In this work, we create a benchmark that is a collection of nine tasks in the domains of natural language processing and computer vision. We model external knowledge as constraints, specify the sources of the constraints for each task, and implement various models that use these constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T16:45:36Z)
• Deep Active Learning with Noise Stability [24.54974925491753]
  Uncertainty estimation for unlabeled data is crucial to active learning. We propose a novel algorithm that leverages noise stability to estimate data uncertainty. Our method is generally applicable in various tasks, including computer vision, natural language processing, and structural data analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T13:21:01Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Multicriteria interpretability driven Deep Learning [0.0]
  Deep Learning methods are renowned for their performances, yet their lack of interpretability prevents them from high-stakes contexts. Recent model methods address this problem by providing post-hoc interpretability methods by reverse-engineering the model's inner workings. We propose a Multicriteria agnostic technique that allows to control the feature effects on the model's outcome by injecting knowledge in the objective function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-28T09:41:13Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• Learning while Respecting Privacy and Robustness to Distributional Uncertainties and Adversarial Data [66.78671826743884]
  The distributionally robust optimization framework is considered for training a parametric model. The objective is to endow the trained model with robustness against adversarially manipulated input data. Proposed algorithms offer robustness with little overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T18:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.