Model-Agnostic Interpretation Framework in Machine Learning: A Comparative Study in NBA Sports

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02630v1
• Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 04:25:21 GMT
• Title: Model-Agnostic Interpretation Framework in Machine Learning: A Comparative Study in NBA Sports
• Authors: Shun Liu
• Abstract summary: We propose an innovative framework to reconcile the trade-off between model performance and interpretability. Our approach is centered around modular operations on high-dimensional data, which enable end-to-end processing while preserving interpretability. We have extensively tested our framework and validated its superior efficacy in achieving a balance between computational efficiency and interpretability.
• Score: 0.2937071029942259
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The field of machine learning has seen tremendous progress in recent years, with deep learning models delivering exceptional performance across a range of tasks. However, these models often come at the cost of interpretability, as they operate as opaque "black boxes" that obscure the rationale behind their decisions. This lack of transparency can limit understanding of the models' underlying principles and impede their deployment in sensitive domains, such as healthcare or finance. To address this challenge, our research team has proposed an innovative framework designed to reconcile the trade-off between model performance and interpretability. Our approach is centered around modular operations on high-dimensional data, which enable end-to-end processing while preserving interpretability. By fusing diverse interpretability techniques and modularized data processing, our framework sheds light on the decision-making processes of complex models without compromising their performance. We have extensively tested our framework and validated its superior efficacy in achieving a harmonious balance between computational efficiency and interpretability. Our approach addresses a critical need in contemporary machine learning applications by providing unprecedented insights into the inner workings of complex models, fostering trust, transparency, and accountability in their deployment across diverse domains.

Related papers

• Explanatory Model Monitoring to Understand the Effects of Feature Shifts on Performance [61.06245197347139]
  We propose a novel approach to explain the behavior of a black-box model under feature shifts. We refer to our method that combines concepts from Optimal Transport and Shapley Values as Explanatory Performance Estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T18:28:19Z)
• Explainable Deep Learning Framework for Human Activity Recognition [3.9146761527401424]
  We propose a model-agnostic framework that enhances interpretability and efficacy of HAR models. By implementing competitive data augmentation, our framework provides intuitive and accessible explanations of model decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T11:59:55Z)
• Investigating the Role of Instruction Variety and Task Difficulty in Robotic Manipulation Tasks [50.75902473813379]
  This work introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework that systematically examines the role of instructions and inputs in the generalisation abilities of such models. The proposed framework uncovers the resilience of multimodal models to extreme instruction perturbations and their vulnerability to observational changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T14:36:49Z)
• Enhancing Fairness and Performance in Machine Learning Models: A Multi-Task Learning Approach with Monte-Carlo Dropout and Pareto Optimality [1.5498930424110338]
  This study introduces an approach to mitigate bias in machine learning by leveraging model uncertainty. Our approach utilizes a multi-task learning (MTL) framework combined with Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout to assess and mitigate uncertainty in predictions related to protected labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T04:17:50Z)
• Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scaling [9.263562546969695]
  We show that the commonly used user token model consistently outperforms more complex models. Our findings shed light on the relationship between corpus statistics and annotator modeling performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T22:27:24Z)
• Stable and Interpretable Deep Learning for Tabular Data: Introducing InterpreTabNet with the Novel InterpreStability Metric [4.362293468843233]
  We introduce InterpreTabNet, a model designed to enhance both classification accuracy and interpretability. We also present a novel evaluation metric, InterpreStability, which quantifies the stability of a model's interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T15:04:13Z)
• Scaling Vision-Language Models with Sparse Mixture of Experts [128.0882767889029]
  We show that mixture-of-experts (MoE) techniques can achieve state-of-the-art performance on a range of benchmarks over dense models of equivalent computational cost. Our research offers valuable insights into stabilizing the training of MoE models, understanding the impact of MoE on model interpretability, and balancing the trade-offs between compute performance when scaling vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:00:31Z)
• Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memory [64.71038763708161]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led to a series of breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP) What further sets these models apart is the massive amounts of world knowledge they internalize during pretraining. How the model's world knowledge interacts with the factual information presented in the context remains under explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T18:58:29Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Towards Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning Models via Inverse Reinforcement Learning [27.841725567976315]
  We propose a novel framework utilizing Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning. This framework provides global explanations for decisions made by a Reinforcement Learning model. We capture intuitive tendencies that the model follows by summarizing the model's decision-making process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T17:01:59Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.