Causal Inference Isn't Special: Why It's Just Another Prediction Problem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04320v1
• Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 01:37:50 GMT
• Title: Causal Inference Isn't Special: Why It's Just Another Prediction Problem
• Authors: Carlos Fernández-Loría,
• Abstract summary: Causal inference is often portrayed as distinct from predictive modeling.<n>But at its core, causal inference is simply a structured instance of prediction under distribution shift.<n>This perspective reframes causal estimation as a familiar generalization problem.
• Score: 1.90365714903665
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal inference is often portrayed as fundamentally distinct from predictive modeling, with its own terminology, goals, and intellectual challenges. But at its core, causal inference is simply a structured instance of prediction under distribution shift. In both cases, we begin with labeled data from a source domain and seek to generalize to a target domain where outcomes are not observed. The key difference is that in causal inference, the labels -- potential outcomes -- are selectively observed based on treatment assignment, introducing bias that must be addressed through assumptions. This perspective reframes causal estimation as a familiar generalization problem and highlights how techniques from predictive modeling, such as reweighting and domain adaptation, apply directly to causal tasks. It also clarifies that causal assumptions are not uniquely strong -- they are simply more explicit. By viewing causal inference through the lens of prediction, we demystify its logic, connect it to familiar tools, and make it more accessible to practitioners and educators alike.

Related papers

• Causal modelling without introducing counterfactuals or abstract distributions [7.09435109588801]
  In this paper, we construe causal inference as treatment-wise predictions for finite populations where all assumptions are testable. The new framework highlights the model-dependence of causal claims as well as the difference between statistical and scientific inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T16:07:57Z)
• Identifiable Latent Neural Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning seeks to uncover latent, high-level causal representations from low-level observed data. We determine the types of distribution shifts that do contribute to the identifiability of causal representations. We translate our findings into a practical algorithm, allowing for the acquisition of reliable latent causal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T04:13:55Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Causality Inspired Representation Learning for Domain Generalization [47.574964496891404]
  We introduce a general structural causal model to formalize the Domain generalization problem. Our goal is to extract the causal factors from inputs and then reconstruct the invariant causal mechanisms. We highlight that ideal causal factors should meet three basic properties: separated from the non-causal ones, jointly independent, and causally sufficient for the classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-27T08:08:33Z)
• Causal Forecasting:Generalization Bounds for Autoregressive Models [19.407531303870087]
  We introduce the framework of *causal learning theory* for forecasting. We obtain a characterization of the difference between statistical and causal risks. This is the first work that provides theoretical guarantees for causal generalization in the time-series setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T17:56:20Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• Learning Causal Semantic Representation for Out-of-Distribution Prediction [125.38836464226092]
  We propose a Causal Semantic Generative model (CSG) based on a causal reasoning so that the two factors are modeled separately. We show that CSG can identify the semantic factor by fitting training data, and this semantic-identification guarantees the boundedness of OOD generalization error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T13:16:05Z)
• Explaining the Behavior of Black-Box Prediction Algorithms with Causal Learning [8.256305306293847]
  Causal approaches to post-hoc explainability for black-box prediction models have become increasingly popular. We learn causal graphical representations that allow for arbitrary unmeasured confounding among features. Our approach is motivated by a counterfactual theory of causal explanation wherein good explanations point to factors that are "difference-makers" in an interventionist sense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T19:02:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.