Decoding Recommendation Behaviors of In-Context Learning LLMs Through Gradient Descent

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04386v1
• Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 06:36:45 GMT
• Title: Decoding Recommendation Behaviors of In-Context Learning LLMs Through Gradient Descent
• Authors: Yi Xu, Weicong Qin, Weijie Yu, Ming He, Jianping Fan, Jun Xu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a theoretical model, the LLM-ICL Recommendation Equivalent Gradient Descent model (LRGD) in this paper.<n>We demonstrate that the ICL inference process in LLM aligns with the training procedure of its dual model, producing token predictions equivalent to the dual model's testing outputs.<n>To further improve demonstration effectiveness, prevent performance collapse, and ensure long-term adaptability, we also propose a two-stage optimization process in practice.
• Score: 15.425423867768163
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recently, there has been a growing trend in utilizing large language models (LLMs) for recommender systems, referred to as LLMRec. A notable approach within this trend is not to fine-tune these models directly but instead to leverage In-Context Learning (ICL) methods tailored for LLMRec, denoted as LLM-ICL Rec. Many contemporary techniques focus on harnessing ICL content to enhance LLMRec performance. However, optimizing LLMRec with ICL content presents unresolved challenges. Specifically, two key issues stand out: (1) the limited understanding of why using a few demonstrations without model fine-tuning can lead to better performance compared to zero-shot recommendations. (2) the lack of evaluation metrics for demonstrations in LLM-ICL Rec and the absence of the theoretical analysis and practical design for optimizing the generation of ICL content for recommendation contexts. To address these two main issues, we propose a theoretical model, the LLM-ICL Recommendation Equivalent Gradient Descent model (LRGD) in this paper, which connects recommendation generation with gradient descent dynamics. We demonstrate that the ICL inference process in LLM aligns with the training procedure of its dual model, producing token predictions equivalent to the dual model's testing outputs. Building on these theoretical insights, we propose an evaluation metric for assessing demonstration quality. We integrate perturbations and regularizations in LRGD to enhance the robustness of the recommender system. To further improve demonstration effectiveness, prevent performance collapse, and ensure long-term adaptability, we also propose a two-stage optimization process in practice. Extensive experiments and detailed analysis on three Amazon datasets validate the theoretical equivalence and support the effectiveness of our theoretical analysis and practical module design.

Related papers

• Language Ranker: A Lightweight Ranking framework for LLM Decoding [70.01564145836129]
  This paper conceptualizes the decoding process as analogous to the ranking stage in recommendation pipelines.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Language Ranker, a novel framework that introduces a lightweight module to rerank candidate responses.<n> Experiments show that Language Ranker achieves performance comparable to large-scale reward models, while requiring only 0.5M additional parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T17:56:46Z)
• Beyond Static LLM Policies: Imitation-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning for Recommendation [23.945049006150555]
  Large language models (LLMs) have become critical tools for enhancing user engagement by delivering personalized content across diverse digital platforms.<n>Direct deployment of LLMs as primary recommendation policies presents notable challenges, including persistent latency issues.<n>This paper proposes a novel offline reinforcement learning framework that leverages imitation learning from LLM-generated trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T07:28:29Z)
• Reasoning with Preference Constraints: A Benchmark for Language Models in Many-to-One Matching Markets [13.111181135818184]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on complex mathematical tasks, including optimization.<n>Applying LLMs to matching problems, which require reasoning under preferential and structural constraints, remains underexplored.<n>We employ a novel benchmark of 369 instances of the College Admission Problem to evaluate LLMs across key dimensions: feasibility, stability, and optimality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T14:48:46Z)
• CARFT: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Contrastive Learning with Annotated Chain-of-Thought-based Reinforced Fine-Tuning [25.142128256576985]
  We propose a Contrastive learning with annotated CoT-based Reinforced Fine-Tuning approach, i.e., TheName, to enhance the reasoning performance of Large Language Models.<n>Our approach not only fully exploits the available annotated CoT but also stabilizes the fine-tuning procedure by incorporating an additional unsupervised learning signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T00:20:47Z)
• Revisiting LLM Reasoning via Information Bottleneck [57.519119962528166]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning capabilities through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR)<n>We present a theoretical characterization of LLM reasoning grounded in information bottleneck (IB) principle.<n>We propose IB-aware reasoning optimization (IBRO), a framework that encourages reasoning trajectories to be both informative about the final correct answer and generalizable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T13:14:25Z)
• Augment or Not? A Comparative Study of Pure and Augmented Large Language Model Recommenders [17.552417918986958]
  Large language models (LLMs) have introduced new paradigms for recommender systems by enabling richer semantic understanding and incorporating implicit world knowledge.<n>We propose a systematic taxonomy that classifies existing approaches into two categories: (1) Pure LLM Recommenders, which rely solely on LLMs, and (2) Augmented LLM Recommenders, which integrate additional non-LLM techniques to enhance performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T03:50:24Z)
• Estimating the Effects of Sample Training Orders for Large Language Models without Retraining [49.59675538160363]
  The order of training samples plays a crucial role in large language models (LLMs)<n>Traditional methods for investigating this effect generally require retraining the model with various sample orders.<n>We improve traditional methods by designing a retraining-free framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T07:07:02Z)
• Large Language Models as Computable Approximations to Solomonoff Induction [11.811838796672369]
  We establish the first formal connection between large language models (LLMs) and Algorithmic Information Theory (AIT)<n>We leverage AIT to provide a unified theoretical explanation for in-context learning, few-shot learning, and scaling laws.<n>Our framework bridges the gap between theoretical foundations and practical LLM behaviors, providing both explanatory power and actionable insights for future model development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T17:35:08Z)
• Investigating the Zone of Proximal Development of Language Models for In-Context Learning [59.91708683601029]
  We introduce a learning analytics framework to analyze the in-context learning (ICL) behavior of large language models (LLMs)<n>We adapt the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) theory to ICL, measuring the ZPD of LLMs based on model performance on individual examples.<n>Our findings reveal a series of intricate and multifaceted behaviors of ICL, providing new insights into understanding and leveraging this technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T19:36:21Z)
• LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning [65.89293674479907]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities across a myriad of tasks, yet they occasionally yield undesirable outputs.<n>We introduce LLM2, a novel framework that combines an LLM with a process-based verifier.<n>LLMs2 is responsible for generating plausible candidates, while the verifier provides timely process-based feedback to distinguish desirable and undesirable outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T06:32:36Z)
• A Little Help Goes a Long Way: Efficient LLM Training by Leveraging Small LMs [74.35290684163718]
  A primary challenge in large language model (LLM) development is their onerous pre-training cost. This paper explores a promising paradigm to improve LLM pre-training efficiency and quality by leveraging a small language model (SLM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T14:31:52Z)
• Understanding Forgetting in LLM Supervised Fine-Tuning and Preference Learning - A Convex Optimization Perspective [55.66517396157806]
  The widely adopted approach in post-training popular open-source LLMs is to sequentially perform SFT and RLHF/DPO.<n>This is suboptimal in terms of SFT and RLHF/DPO trade-off.<n>We propose a practical joint post-training framework which has theoretical convergence guarantees and empirically outperforms sequential post-training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T19:38:41Z)
• Attribute Controlled Fine-tuning for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Detoxification [76.14641982122696]
  We propose a constraint learning schema for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with attribute control. We show that our approach leads to an LLM that produces fewer inappropriate responses while achieving competitive performance on benchmarks and a toxicity detection task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T23:38:58Z)
• Achieving Peak Performance for Large Language Models: A Systematic Review [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing (NLP) As models grow into the trillion- parameter range, computational and memory costs increase significantly. This makes it difficult for many researchers to access the resources needed to train or apply these models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T13:57:41Z)
• Are LLM-based Recommenders Already the Best? Simple Scaled Cross-entropy Unleashes the Potential of Traditional Sequential Recommenders [31.116716790604116]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been garnering increasing attention in the recommendation community. Some studies have observed that LLMs, when fine-tuned by the cross-entropy (CE) loss with a full softmax, could achieve state-of-the-art' performance in sequential recommendation. This study provides theoretical justification for the superiority of the cross-entropy loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T12:52:02Z)
• DELRec: Distilling Sequential Pattern to Enhance LLMs-based Sequential Recommendation [7.914816884185941]
  Sequential recommendation (SR) tasks aim to predict users' next interaction by learning their behavior sequence and capturing the connection between users' past interactions and their changing preferences.<n> Conventional SR models often focus solely on capturing sequential patterns within the training data, neglecting the broader context and semantic information embedded in item titles from external sources.<n>Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promise in SR tasks due to their advanced understanding capabilities and strong generalization abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T02:47:09Z)
• LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Task [54.48899723591296]
  The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the recommendation domain has not been thoroughly investigated. We benchmark several popular off-the-shelf LLMs on five recommendation tasks, including rating prediction, sequential recommendation, direct recommendation, explanation generation, and review summarization. The benchmark results indicate that LLMs displayed only moderate proficiency in accuracy-based tasks such as sequential and direct recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T16:32:54Z)
• On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
  Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)
• Iterative Forward Tuning Boosts In-Context Learning in Language Models [88.25013390669845]
  In this study, we introduce a novel two-stage framework to boost in-context learning in large language models (LLMs) Specifically, our framework delineates the ICL process into two distinct stages: Deep-Thinking and test stages. The Deep-Thinking stage incorporates a unique attention mechanism, i.e., iterative enhanced attention, which enables multiple rounds of information accumulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T13:18:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.