A Survey on Hypothesis Generation for Scientific Discovery in the Era of Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05496v1
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 20:44:33 GMT
- Title: A Survey on Hypothesis Generation for Scientific Discovery in the Era of Large Language Models
- Authors: Atilla Kaan Alkan, Shashwat Sourav, Maja Jablonska, Simone Astarita, Rishabh Chakrabarty, Nikhil Garuda, Pranav Khetarpal, Maciej Pióro, Dimitrios Tanoglidis, Kartheik G. Iyer, Mugdha S. Polimera, Michael J. Smith, Tirthankar Ghosal, Marc Huertas-Company, Sandor Kruk, Kevin Schawinski, Ioana Ciucă,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked growing interest in their potential to enhance and automate hypothesis generation.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey of hypothesis generation with LLMs.
- Score: 0.9383505015433911
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Hypothesis generation is a fundamental step in scientific discovery, yet it is increasingly challenged by information overload and disciplinary fragmentation. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked growing interest in their potential to enhance and automate this process. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of hypothesis generation with LLMs by (i) reviewing existing methods, from simple prompting techniques to more complex frameworks, and proposing a taxonomy that categorizes these approaches; (ii) analyzing techniques for improving hypothesis quality, such as novelty boosting and structured reasoning; (iii) providing an overview of evaluation strategies; and (iv) discussing key challenges and future directions, including multimodal integration and human-AI collaboration. Our survey aims to serve as a reference for researchers exploring LLMs for hypothesis generation.
Related papers
- IRIS: Interactive Research Ideation System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery [27.218896203253987]
IRIS is an open-source platform designed for researchers to leverage large language models (LLMs)-assisted scientific ideation.
IRIS incorporates innovative features to enhance ideation, including adaptive test-time compute expansion via Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), fine-grained feedback mechanism, and query-based literature synthesis.
We conduct a user study with researchers across diverse disciplines, validating the effectiveness of our system in enhancing ideation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-23T14:01:36Z) - ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition [67.26124739345332]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined.
We introduce the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating LLMs with a near-sufficient set of sub-tasks of scientific discovery.
We develop an automated framework that extracts critical components - research questions, background surveys, inspirations, and hypotheses - from scientific papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T08:09:15Z) - A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration.<n>These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z) - From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systems [40.10425916520717]
In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has inspired researchers to explore how AI can accelerate and enhance research.
This paper presents a systematic review of the progress in this domain.
We organize relevant studies into three main categories: hypothesis formulation, hypothesis validation, and manuscript publication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T11:27:13Z) - Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.
Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z) - Large Language Model for Qualitative Research -- A Systematic Mapping Study [3.302912592091359]
Large Language Models (LLMs), powered by advanced generative AI, have emerged as transformative tools.<n>This study systematically maps the literature on the use of LLMs for qualitative research.<n>Findings reveal that LLMs are utilized across diverse fields, demonstrating the potential to automate processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T21:28:00Z) - Chain of Ideas: Revolutionizing Research Via Novel Idea Development with LLM Agents [64.64280477958283]
An exponential increase in scientific literature makes it challenging for researchers to stay current with recent advances and identify meaningful research directions.
Recent developments in large language models(LLMs) suggest a promising avenue for automating the generation of novel research ideas.
We propose a Chain-of-Ideas(CoI) agent, an LLM-based agent that organizes relevant literature in a chain structure to effectively mirror the progressive development in a research domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T03:26:37Z) - From Linguistic Giants to Sensory Maestros: A Survey on Cross-Modal Reasoning with Large Language Models [56.9134620424985]
Cross-modal reasoning (CMR) is increasingly recognized as a crucial capability in the progression toward more sophisticated artificial intelligence systems.
The recent trend of deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle CMR tasks has marked a new mainstream of approaches for enhancing their effectiveness.
This survey offers a nuanced exposition of current methodologies applied in CMR using LLMs, classifying these into a detailed three-tiered taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T02:51:54Z) - ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
ResearchAgent is an AI-based system for ideation and operationalization of novel work.<n>ResearchAgent automatically defines novel problems, proposes methods and designs experiments, while iteratively refining them.<n>We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z) - Large Language Models are Zero Shot Hypothesis Proposers [17.612235393984744]
Large Language Models (LLMs) hold a wealth of global and interdisciplinary knowledge that promises to break down information barriers.
We construct a dataset consist of background knowledge and hypothesis pairs from biomedical literature.
We evaluate the hypothesis generation capabilities of various top-tier instructed models in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T10:03:49Z) - Trends in Integration of Knowledge and Large Language Models: A Survey and Taxonomy of Methods, Benchmarks, and Applications [41.24492058141363]
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit superior performance on various natural language tasks, but they are susceptible to issues stemming from outdated data and domain-specific limitations.
We propose a review to discuss the trends in integration of knowledge and large language models, including taxonomy of methods, benchmarks, and applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T05:24:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.