DaemonSec: Examining the Role of Machine Learning for Daemon Security in Linux Environments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08227v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 03:20:24 GMT
• Title: DaemonSec: Examining the Role of Machine Learning for Daemon Security in Linux Environments
• Authors: Sheikh Muhammad Farjad,
• Abstract summary: DaemonSec is an early-stage startup exploring machine learning (ML)-based security for Linux daemons.<n>This paper presents the methods, key findings, and implications for advancing ML-driven daemon security in industry.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: DaemonSec is an early-stage startup exploring machine learning (ML)-based security for Linux daemons, a critical yet often overlooked attack surface. While daemon security remains underexplored, conventional defenses struggle against adaptive threats and zero-day exploits. To assess the perspectives of IT professionals on ML-driven daemon protection, a systematic interview study based on semi-structured interviews was conducted with 22 professionals from industry and academia. The study evaluates adoption, feasibility, and trust in ML-based security solutions. While participants recognized the potential of ML for real-time anomaly detection, findings reveal skepticism toward full automation, limited security awareness among non-security roles, and concerns about patching delays creating attack windows. This paper presents the methods, key findings, and implications for advancing ML-driven daemon security in industry.

Related papers

• SafeMLRM: Demystifying Safety in Multi-modal Large Reasoning Models [50.34706204154244]
  Acquiring reasoning capabilities catastrophically degrades inherited safety alignment. Certain scenarios suffer 25 times higher attack rates. Despite tight reasoning-answer safety coupling, MLRMs demonstrate nascent self-correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T06:53:23Z)
• Commercial LLM Agents Are Already Vulnerable to Simple Yet Dangerous Attacks [88.84977282952602]
  A high volume of recent ML security literature focuses on attacks against aligned large language models (LLMs)<n>In this paper, we analyze security and privacy vulnerabilities that are unique to LLM agents.<n>We conduct a series of illustrative attacks on popular open-source and commercial agents, demonstrating the immediate practical implications of their vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T17:19:36Z)
• Global Challenge for Safe and Secure LLMs Track 1 [57.08717321907755]
  The Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs) is a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) This paper introduces the Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs), a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) to foster the development of advanced defense mechanisms against automated jailbreaking attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T08:20:31Z)
• AutoPT: How Far Are We from the End2End Automated Web Penetration Testing? [54.65079443902714]
  We introduce AutoPT, an automated penetration testing agent based on the principle of PSM driven by LLMs. Our results show that AutoPT outperforms the baseline framework ReAct on the GPT-4o mini model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T13:24:30Z)
• Preemptive Detection and Correction of Misaligned Actions in LLM Agents [70.54226917774933]
  InferAct is a novel approach to detect misaligned actions before execution.<n>It alerts users for timely correction, preventing adverse outcomes.<n>InferAct achieves up to 20% improvements on Marco-F1 against baselines in misaligned action detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T15:24:44Z)
• Transforming Computer Security and Public Trust Through the Exploration of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models [0.0]
  "Mallas" are malicious services that exploit large language models (LLMs) for nefarious purposes. This paper delves into the proliferation of Mallas by examining the use of various pre-trained language models and their efficiency and vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T06:10:31Z)
• Vulnerability of Machine Learning Approaches Applied in IoT-based Smart Grid: A Review [51.31851488650698]
  Machine learning (ML) sees an increasing prevalence of being used in the internet-of-things (IoT)-based smart grid. adversarial distortion injected into the power signal will greatly affect the system's normal control and operation. It is imperative to conduct vulnerability assessment for MLsgAPPs applied in the context of safety-critical power systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T03:29:26Z)
• Confidential Machine Learning Computation in Untrusted Environments: A Systems Security Perspective [1.9116784879310027]
  This paper conducts a systematic and comprehensive survey by classifying attack vectors and mitigation in TEE-protected confidential ML in the untrusted environment. It analyzes the multi-party ML security requirements, and discusses related engineering challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-05T07:56:25Z)
• Robust Machine Learning Systems: Challenges, Current Trends, Perspectives, and the Road Ahead [24.60052335548398]
  Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been rapidly adopted by smart Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and Internet-of-Things (IoT) They are vulnerable to various security and reliability threats, at both hardware and software levels, that compromise their accuracy. This paper summarizes the prominent vulnerabilities of modern ML systems, highlights successful defenses and mitigation techniques against these vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T20:06:56Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
• Security and Machine Learning in the Real World [33.40597438876848]
  We build on our experience evaluating the security of a machine learning software product deployed on a large scale to broaden the conversation to include a systems security view of vulnerabilities. We propose a list of short-term mitigation suggestions that practitioners deploying machine learning modules can use to secure their systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T16:57:12Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning -- Industry Perspectives [6.645585967550316]
  Based on interviews with 28 organizations, we found that industry practitioners are not equipped with tactical and strategic tools to protect, detect and respond to attacks on their Machine Learning (ML) systems. We leverage the insights from the interviews and enumerate the gaps in perspective in securing machine learning systems when viewed in the context of traditional software security development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T02:28:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.