MHTS: Multi-Hop Tree Structure Framework for Generating Difficulty-Controllable QA Datasets for RAG Evaluation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08756v1
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 06:26:01 GMT
- Title: MHTS: Multi-Hop Tree Structure Framework for Generating Difficulty-Controllable QA Datasets for RAG Evaluation
- Authors: Jeongsoo Lee, Daeyong Kwon, Kyohoon Jin, Junnyeong Jeong, Minwoo Sim, Minwoo Kim,
- Abstract summary: Existing RAG benchmarks often overlook query difficulty, leading to inflated performance on simpler questions and unreliable evaluations.<n>We propose MHTS (Multi-Hop Tree Structure), a novel dataset synthesis framework that controls multi-hop reasoning complexity by leveraging a multi-hop tree structure to generate logically connected, multi-chunk queries.
- Score: 5.525151548786079
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Existing RAG benchmarks often overlook query difficulty, leading to inflated performance on simpler questions and unreliable evaluations. A robust benchmark dataset must satisfy three key criteria: quality, diversity, and difficulty, which capturing the complexity of reasoning based on hops and the distribution of supporting evidence. In this paper, we propose MHTS (Multi-Hop Tree Structure), a novel dataset synthesis framework that systematically controls multi-hop reasoning complexity by leveraging a multi-hop tree structure to generate logically connected, multi-chunk queries. Our fine-grained difficulty estimation formula exhibits a strong correlation with the overall performance metrics of a RAG system, validating its effectiveness in assessing both retrieval and answer generation capabilities. By ensuring high-quality, diverse, and difficulty-controlled queries, our approach enhances RAG evaluation and benchmarking capabilities.
Related papers
- Credible plan-driven RAG method for Multi-hop Question Answering [2.5772544412212985]
Multi-hop question answering (QA) presents a considerable challenge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
deviations in reasoning paths or errors in intermediate results, which are common in current RAG methods, may propagate and accumulate throughout the reasoning process.
We propose the Plan-then-Act-and-Review (PAR RAG) framework, which is organized into three key stages: planning, act, and review.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-23T15:03:17Z) - PuzzleBench: A Fully Dynamic Evaluation Framework for Large Multimodal Models on Puzzle Solving [50.50405233978406]
We propose a fully dynamic multimodal evaluation framework, named Open-ended Visual Puzzle Generation (OVPG)
OVPG aims to generate fresh, diverse, and verifiable evaluation data automatically in puzzle-solving tasks.
Built upon OVPG, we construct PuzzleBench, a dynamic and scalable benchmark comprising 11,840 VQA samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-15T05:29:31Z) - HM-RAG: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation [11.53083922927901]
HM-RAG is a novel Hierarchical Multi-agent Multimodal RAG framework.<n>It pioneers collaborative intelligence for dynamic knowledge synthesis across structured, unstructured, and graph-based data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-13T06:55:33Z) - MultiConIR: Towards multi-condition Information Retrieval [57.6405602406446]
We introduce MultiConIR, the first benchmark designed to evaluate retrieval models in multi-condition scenarios.
We propose three tasks to assess retrieval and reranking models on multi-condition robustness, monotonic relevance ranking, and query format sensitivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T05:02:03Z) - Large Language Models Meet Symbolic Provers for Logical Reasoning Evaluation [24.081573908824353]
First-order logic (FOL) reasoning is pivotal for intelligent systems.<n>Existing benchmarks often rely on extensive human annotation or handcrafted templates.<n>We propose a novel framework called ProverGen that synergizes the generative strengths of Large Language Models with the rigor and precision of symbolic provers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T15:31:54Z) - Chain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation [72.06205327186069]
This paper introduces an approach for training o1-like RAG models that retrieve and reason over relevant information step by step before generating the final answer.<n>Our proposed method, CoRAG, allows the model to dynamically reformulate the query based on the evolving state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T09:12:52Z) - Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z) - RiTeK: A Dataset for Large Language Models Complex Reasoning over Textual Knowledge Graphs [12.846097618151951]
We develop a dataset for LLMs Complex Reasoning over Textual Knowledge Graphs (RiTeK) with a broad topological structure coverage.
We synthesize realistic user queries that integrate diverse topological structures, annotated information, and complex textual descriptions.
We introduce an enhanced Monte Carlo Tree Search (CTS) method, which automatically extracts relational path information from textual graphs for specific queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T19:33:37Z) - BabelBench: An Omni Benchmark for Code-Driven Analysis of Multimodal and Multistructured Data [61.936320820180875]
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly pivotal across various domains.
BabelBench is an innovative benchmark framework that evaluates the proficiency of LLMs in managing multimodal multistructured data with code execution.
Our experimental findings on BabelBench indicate that even cutting-edge models like ChatGPT 4 exhibit substantial room for improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T15:11:24Z) - DEXTER: A Benchmark for open-domain Complex Question Answering using LLMs [3.24692739098077]
Open-domain complex Question Answering (QA) is a difficult task with challenges in evidence retrieval and reasoning.
We evaluate state-of-the-art pre-trained dense and sparse retrieval models in an open-domain setting.
We observe that late interaction models and surprisingly lexical models like BM25 perform well compared to other pre-trained dense retrieval models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T22:09:50Z) - RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems [51.171355532527365]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can significantly improve the performance of language models (LMs)
RAGGED is a framework for analyzing RAG configurations across various document-based question answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T02:26:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.