InteractiveSurvey: An LLM-based Personalized and Interactive Survey Paper Generation System

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08762v1
• Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 04:23:22 GMT
• Title: InteractiveSurvey: An LLM-based Personalized and Interactive Survey Paper Generation System
• Authors: Zhiyuan Wen, Jiannong Cao, Zian Wang, Beichen Guo, Ruosong Yang, Shuaiqi Liu,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) facilitate studies in synthesizing survey papers from multiple references.<n>In this paper, we introduce InteractiveSurvey - an LLM-based personalized and interactive survey paper generation system.
• Score: 29.924809109589518
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The exponential growth of academic literature creates urgent demands for comprehensive survey papers, yet manual writing remains time-consuming and labor-intensive. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) facilitate studies in synthesizing survey papers from multiple references, but most existing works restrict users to title-only inputs and fixed outputs, neglecting the personalized process of survey paper writing. In this paper, we introduce InteractiveSurvey - an LLM-based personalized and interactive survey paper generation system. InteractiveSurvey can generate structured, multi-modal survey papers with reference categorizations from multiple reference papers through both online retrieval and user uploads. More importantly, users can customize and refine intermediate components continuously during generation, including reference categorization, outline, and survey content through an intuitive interface. Evaluations of content quality, time efficiency, and user studies show that InteractiveSurvey is an easy-to-use survey generation system that outperforms most LLMs and existing methods in output content quality while remaining highly time-efficient.

Related papers

• Can LLMs Generate Tabular Summaries of Science Papers? Rethinking the Evaluation Protocol [83.90769864167301]
  Literature review tables are essential for summarizing and comparing collections of scientific papers.<n>We explore the task of generating tables that best fulfill a user's informational needs given a collection of scientific papers.<n>Our contributions focus on three key challenges encountered in real-world use: (i) User prompts are often under-specified; (ii) Retrieved candidate papers frequently contain irrelevant content; and (iii) Task evaluation should move beyond shallow text similarity techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T14:52:28Z)
• SurveyForge: On the Outline Heuristics, Memory-Driven Generation, and Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Automated Survey Writing [13.101632066188532]
  We introduce SurveyForge, which generates the outline by analyzing the logical structure of human-written outlines.<n>To achieve a comprehensive evaluation, we construct SurveyBench, which includes 100 human-written survey papers for win-rate comparison.<n>Experiments demonstrate that SurveyForge can outperform previous works such as AutoSurvey.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T17:15:48Z)
• Personalized Generation In Large Model Era: A Survey [90.7579254803302]
  In the era of large models, content generation is gradually shifting to Personalized Generation (PGen)<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey on PGen, investigating existing research in this rapidly growing field.<n>By bridging PGen research across multiple modalities, this survey serves as a valuable resource for fostering knowledge sharing and interdisciplinary collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T13:34:19Z)
• Personalized Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey [127.9521218125761]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become increasingly important due to their state-of-the-art performance and ability to integrate multiple data modalities.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey on personalized multimodal large language models, focusing on their architecture, training methods, and applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T03:59:03Z)
• Instruct Large Language Models to Generate Scientific Literature Survey Step by Step [21.149406605689297]
  We design prompts to systematically leverage large language models (LLMs) We argue that this design enables the generation of the headings from a high-level perspective. Our implementation with Qwen-long achieved third place in the NLPCC 2024 Scientific Literature Survey Generation evaluation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T02:07:11Z)
• Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text Generation [63.50597360948099]
  Large language models (LLMs) bring unprecedented flexibility in defining and executing complex, creative natural language generation (NLG) tasks. We propose a three-component research framework that consists of systematic input manipulation, reference data, and output measurement. We use this framework to explore citation text generation -- a popular scholarly NLP task that lacks consensus on the task definition and evaluation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T16:41:08Z)
• Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactions [62.0123588983514]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated wide-ranging applications across various fields. We reformulate the peer-review process as a multi-turn, long-context dialogue, incorporating distinct roles for authors, reviewers, and decision makers. We construct a comprehensive dataset containing over 26,841 papers with 92,017 reviews collected from multiple sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T08:24:17Z)
• Enhancing Presentation Slide Generation by LLMs with a Multi-Staged End-to-End Approach [21.8104104944488]
  Existing approaches for generating a rich presentation from a document are often semi-automatic or only put a flat summary into the slides ignoring the importance of a good narrative. We propose a multi-staged end-to-end model which uses a combination of LLM and VLM. We have experimentally shown that compared to applying LLMs directly with state-of-the-art prompting, our proposed multi-staged solution is better in terms of automated metrics and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T07:49:31Z)
• Bridging Research and Readers: A Multi-Modal Automated Academic Papers Interpretation System [47.13932723910289]
  We introduce an open-source multi-modal automated academic paper interpretation system (MMAPIS) with three-step process stages. It employs the hybrid modality preprocessing and alignment module to extract plain text, and tables or figures from documents separately. It then aligns this information based on the section names they belong to, ensuring that data with identical section names are categorized under the same section. It utilizes the extracted section names to divide the article into shorter text segments, facilitating specific summarizations both within and between sections via LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T11:50:53Z)
• Tell Me How to Survey: Literature Review Made Simple with Automatic Reading Path Generation [16.07200776251764]
  How to glean papers worth reading from the massive literature to do a quick survey or keep up with the latest advancement about a specific research topic has become a challenging task. Existing academic search engines such as Google Scholar return relevant papers by individually calculating the relevance between each paper and query. We introduce Reading Path Generation (RPG) which aims at automatically producing a path of papers to read for a given query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T20:58:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.