Instruct Large Language Models to Generate Scientific Literature Survey Step by Step

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07884v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 02:07:11 GMT
• Title: Instruct Large Language Models to Generate Scientific Literature Survey Step by Step
• Authors: Yuxuan Lai, Yupeng Wu, Yidan Wang, Wenpeng Hu, Chen Zheng,
• Abstract summary: We design prompts to systematically leverage large language models (LLMs) We argue that this design enables the generation of the headings from a high-level perspective. Our implementation with Qwen-long achieved third place in the NLPCC 2024 Scientific Literature Survey Generation evaluation task.
• Score: 21.149406605689297
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Abstract. Automatically generating scientific literature surveys is a valuable task that can significantly enhance research efficiency. However, the diverse and complex nature of information within a literature survey poses substantial challenges for generative models. In this paper, we design a series of prompts to systematically leverage large language models (LLMs), enabling the creation of comprehensive literature surveys through a step-by-step approach. Specifically, we design prompts to guide LLMs to sequentially generate the title, abstract, hierarchical headings, and the main content of the literature survey. We argue that this design enables the generation of the headings from a high-level perspective. During the content generation process, this design effectively harnesses relevant information while minimizing costs by restricting the length of both input and output content in LLM queries. Our implementation with Qwen-long achieved third place in the NLPCC 2024 Scientific Literature Survey Generation evaluation task, with an overall score only 0.03% lower than the second-place team. Additionally, our soft heading recall is 95.84%, the second best among the submissions. Thanks to the efficient prompt design and the low cost of the Qwen-long API, our method reduces the expense for generating each literature survey to 0.1 RMB, enhancing the practical value of our method.

Related papers

• Can LLMs Generate Tabular Summaries of Science Papers? Rethinking the Evaluation Protocol [83.90769864167301]
  Literature review tables are essential for summarizing and comparing collections of scientific papers. We explore the task of generating tables that best fulfill a user's informational needs given a collection of scientific papers. Our contributions focus on three key challenges encountered in real-world use: (i) User prompts are often under-specified; (ii) Retrieved candidate papers frequently contain irrelevant content; and (iii) Task evaluation should move beyond shallow text similarity techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T14:52:28Z)
• SurveyForge: On the Outline Heuristics, Memory-Driven Generation, and Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Automated Survey Writing [13.101632066188532]
  We introduce SurveyForge, which generates the outline by analyzing the logical structure of human-written outlines. To achieve a comprehensive evaluation, we construct SurveyBench, which includes 100 human-written survey papers for win-rate comparison. Experiments demonstrate that SurveyForge can outperform previous works such as AutoSurvey.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T17:15:48Z)
• LitLLMs, LLMs for Literature Review: Are we there yet? [15.785989492351684]
  This paper explores the zero-shot abilities of recent Large Language Models in assisting with the writing of literature reviews based on an abstract. For retrieval, we introduce a novel two-step search strategy that first uses an LLM to extract meaningful keywords from the abstract of a paper. In the generation phase, we propose a two-step approach that first outlines a plan for the review and then executes steps in the plan to generate the actual review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T01:12:26Z)
• A Survey of Small Language Models [104.80308007044634]
  Small Language Models (SLMs) have become increasingly important due to their efficiency and performance to perform various language tasks with minimal computational resources. We present a comprehensive survey on SLMs, focusing on their architectures, training techniques, and model compression techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T23:52:28Z)
• Integrating Planning into Single-Turn Long-Form Text Generation [66.08871753377055]
  We propose to use planning to generate long form content. Our main novelty lies in a single auxiliary task that does not require multiple rounds of prompting or planning. Our experiments demonstrate on two datasets from different domains, that LLMs fine-tuned with the auxiliary task generate higher quality documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:02:40Z)
• LLAssist: Simple Tools for Automating Literature Review Using Large Language Models [0.0]
  LLAssist is an open-source tool designed to streamline literature reviews in academic research. It uses Large Language Models (LLMs) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to automate key aspects of the review process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T02:48:54Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text Generation [63.50597360948099]
  Large language models (LLMs) bring unprecedented flexibility in defining and executing complex, creative natural language generation (NLG) tasks. We propose a three-component research framework that consists of systematic input manipulation, reference data, and output measurement. We use this framework to explore citation text generation -- a popular scholarly NLP task that lacks consensus on the task definition and evaluation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T16:41:08Z)
• ResearchArena: Benchmarking LLMs' Ability to Collect and Organize Information as Research Agents [21.17856299966841]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable performance across various tasks in natural language processing. We develop ResearchArena, a benchmark that measures LLM agents' ability to conduct academic surveys.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T03:26:30Z)
• Enriched BERT Embeddings for Scholarly Publication Classification [0.13654846342364302]
  The NSLP 2024 FoRC Task I addresses this challenge organized as a competition. The goal is to develop a classifier capable of predicting one of 123 predefined classes from the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) taxonomy of research fields for a given article.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T09:05:20Z)
• ChatCite: LLM Agent with Human Workflow Guidance for Comparative Literature Summary [30.409552944905915]
  ChatCite is an LLM agent with human workflow guidance for comparative literature summary. The ChatCite agent outperformed other models in various dimensions in the experiments. The literature summaries generated by ChatCite can also be directly used for drafting literature reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T01:13:56Z)
• The Efficiency Spectrum of Large Language Models: An Algorithmic Survey [54.19942426544731]
  The rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) has been a driving force in transforming various domains. This paper examines the multi-faceted dimensions of efficiency essential for the end-to-end algorithmic development of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T16:00:25Z)
• Recitation-Augmented Language Models [85.30591349383849]
  We show that RECITE is a powerful paradigm for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Specifically, we show that by utilizing recitation as the intermediate step, a recite-and-answer scheme can achieve new state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T00:49:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.