Negate or Embrace: On How Misalignment Shapes Multimodal Representation Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10143v3
• Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:33:30 GMT
• Title: Negate or Embrace: On How Misalignment Shapes Multimodal Representation Learning
• Authors: Yichao Cai, Yuhang Liu, Erdun Gao, Tianjiao Jiang, Zhen Zhang, Anton van den Hengel, Javen Qinfeng Shi,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal representation learning aims to learn powerful representations by aligning cues across modalities.<n>Recent research has revealed that real-world datasets often exhibit misalignment.
• Score: 37.29274397631946
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal representation learning, exemplified by multimodal contrastive learning (MMCL) using image-text pairs, aims to learn powerful representations by aligning cues across modalities. This approach relies on the core assumption that the exemplar image-text pairs constitute two representations of an identical concept. However, recent research has revealed that real-world datasets often exhibit misalignment. There are two distinct viewpoints on how to address this issue: one suggests mitigating the misalignment, and the other leveraging it. We seek here to reconcile these seemingly opposing perspectives, and to provide a practical guide for practitioners. Using latent variable models we thus formalize misalignment by introducing two specific mechanisms: selection bias, where some semantic variables are missing, and perturbation bias, where semantic variables are distorted -- both affecting latent variables shared across modalities. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that, under mild assumptions, the representations learned by MMCL capture exactly the information related to the subset of the semantic variables invariant to selection and perturbation biases. This provides a unified perspective for understanding misalignment. Based on this, we further offer actionable insights into how misalignment should inform the design of real-world ML systems. We validate our theoretical findings through extensive empirical studies on both synthetic data and real image-text datasets, shedding light on the nuanced impact of misalignment on multimodal representation learning.

Related papers

• Towards a Learning Theory of Representation Alignment [12.166663160280056]
  We propose a learning-theoretic perspective to representation alignment.<n>Our results can be seen as a first step toward casting representation alignment as a learning-theoretic problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T19:09:14Z)
• The "Law" of the Unconscious Contrastive Learner: Probabilistic Alignment of Unpaired Modalities [23.188014611990152]
  This paper builds on work on the geometry and probabilistic interpretation of contrastive representations.<n>We show how these representations can answer many of the same inferences as probabilistic graphical models.<n>Our analysis suggests two new ways of using contrastive representations: in settings with pre-trained contrastive models, and for handling language ambiguity in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T08:10:15Z)
• The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning Approaches [64.40701218561921]
  We provide a framework to explain the stability mechanism of different self-supervised learning techniques. We discuss the working mechanism of contrastive techniques like SimCLR, non-contrastive techniques like BYOL, SWAV, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and DINO. We formulate different hypotheses and test them using the Imagenet100 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T20:36:24Z)
• Revealing Multimodal Contrastive Representation Learning through Latent Partial Causal Models [85.67870425656368]
  We introduce a unified causal model specifically designed for multimodal data. We show that multimodal contrastive representation learning excels at identifying latent coupled variables. Experiments demonstrate the robustness of our findings, even when the assumptions are violated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T07:18:06Z)
• Variational Distillation for Multi-View Learning [104.17551354374821]
  We design several variational information bottlenecks to exploit two key characteristics for multi-view representation learning. Under rigorously theoretical guarantee, our approach enables IB to grasp the intrinsic correlation between observations and semantic labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T03:09:46Z)
• Towards Robust and Adaptive Motion Forecasting: A Causal Representation Perspective [72.55093886515824]
  We introduce a causal formalism of motion forecasting, which casts the problem as a dynamic process with three groups of latent variables. We devise a modular architecture that factorizes the representations of invariant mechanisms and style confounders to approximate a causal graph. Experiment results on synthetic and real datasets show that our three proposed components significantly improve the robustness and reusability of the learned motion representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T18:59:09Z)
• Learning Disentangled Representations with Latent Variation Predictability [102.4163768995288]
  This paper defines the variation predictability of latent disentangled representations. Within an adversarial generation process, we encourage variation predictability by maximizing the mutual information between latent variations and corresponding image pairs. We develop an evaluation metric that does not rely on the ground-truth generative factors to measure the disentanglement of latent representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-25T08:54:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.