The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning Approaches

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14957v1
• Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:36:24 GMT
• Title: The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning Approaches
• Authors: Abhishek Jha, Matthew B. Blaschko, Yuki M. Asano, Tinne Tuytelaars
• Abstract summary: We provide a framework to explain the stability mechanism of different self-supervised learning techniques. We discuss the working mechanism of contrastive techniques like SimCLR, non-contrastive techniques like BYOL, SWAV, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and DINO. We formulate different hypotheses and test them using the Imagenet100 dataset.
• Score: 64.40701218561921
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Last couple of years have witnessed a tremendous progress in self-supervised learning (SSL), the success of which can be attributed to the introduction of useful inductive biases in the learning process to learn meaningful visual representations while avoiding collapse. These inductive biases and constraints manifest themselves in the form of different optimization formulations in the SSL techniques, e.g. by utilizing negative examples in a contrastive formulation, or exponential moving average and predictor in BYOL and SimSiam. In this paper, we provide a framework to explain the stability mechanism of these different SSL techniques: i) we discuss the working mechanism of contrastive techniques like SimCLR, non-contrastive techniques like BYOL, SWAV, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and DINO; ii) we provide an argument that despite different formulations these methods implicitly optimize a similar objective function, i.e. minimizing the magnitude of the expected representation over all data samples, or the mean of the data distribution, while maximizing the magnitude of the expected representation of individual samples over different data augmentations; iii) we provide mathematical and empirical evidence to support our framework. We formulate different hypotheses and test them using the Imagenet100 dataset.

Related papers

• Enhancing In-Context Learning via Implicit Demonstration Augmentation [26.78252788538567]
  In-context learning (ICL) enables pre-trained language models to make predictions for unseen inputs without updating parameters. Despite its potential, ICL's effectiveness heavily relies on the quality, quantity, and permutation of demonstrations. In this paper, we tackle this challenge for the first time from the perspective of demonstration augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T05:25:46Z)
• Supervised Fine-Tuning as Inverse Reinforcement Learning [8.044033685073003]
  The prevailing approach to aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) typically relies on human or AI feedback. In our work, we question the efficacy of such datasets and explore various scenarios where alignment with expert demonstrations proves more realistic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:52:57Z)
• A Probabilistic Model Behind Self-Supervised Learning [53.64989127914936]
  In self-supervised learning (SSL), representations are learned via an auxiliary task without annotated labels. We present a generative latent variable model for self-supervised learning. We show that several families of discriminative SSL, including contrastive methods, induce a comparable distribution over representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T13:31:17Z)
• Revisiting Demonstration Selection Strategies in In-Context Learning [66.11652803887284]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown an impressive ability to perform a wide range of tasks using in-context learning (ICL) In this work, we first revisit the factors contributing to this variance from both data and model aspects, and find that the choice of demonstration is both data- and model-dependent. We propose a data- and model-dependent demonstration selection method, textbfTopK + ConE, based on the assumption that textitthe performance of a demonstration positively correlates with its contribution to the model's understanding of the test samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T16:25:27Z)
• Towards Better Modeling with Missing Data: A Contrastive Learning-based Visual Analytics Perspective [7.577040836988683]
  Missing data can pose a challenge for machine learning (ML) modeling. Current approaches are categorized into feature imputation and label prediction. This study proposes a Contrastive Learning framework to model observed data with missing values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T13:16:24Z)
• ArCL: Enhancing Contrastive Learning with Augmentation-Robust Representations [30.745749133759304]
  We develop a theoretical framework to analyze the transferability of self-supervised contrastive learning. We show that contrastive learning fails to learn domain-invariant features, which limits its transferability. Based on these theoretical insights, we propose a novel method called Augmentation-robust Contrastive Learning (ArCL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T09:26:20Z)
• Weak Augmentation Guided Relational Self-Supervised Learning [80.0680103295137]
  We introduce a novel relational self-supervised learning (ReSSL) framework that learns representations by modeling the relationship between different instances. Our proposed method employs sharpened distribution of pairwise similarities among different instances as textitrelation metric. Experimental results show that our proposed ReSSL substantially outperforms the state-of-the-art methods across different network architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T16:14:19Z)
• Exploring Complementary Strengths of Invariant and Equivariant Representations for Few-Shot Learning [96.75889543560497]
  In many real-world problems, collecting a large number of labeled samples is infeasible. Few-shot learning is the dominant approach to address this issue, where the objective is to quickly adapt to novel categories in presence of a limited number of samples. We propose a novel training mechanism that simultaneously enforces equivariance and invariance to a general set of geometric transformations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T21:14:33Z)
• On Data-Augmentation and Consistency-Based Semi-Supervised Learning [77.57285768500225]
  Recently proposed consistency-based Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) methods have advanced the state of the art in several SSL tasks. Despite these advances, the understanding of these methods is still relatively limited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T10:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.