Power-scaled Bayesian Inference with Score-based Generative Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10807v2
• Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 20:36:14 GMT
• Title: Power-scaled Bayesian Inference with Score-based Generative Models
• Authors: Huseyin Tuna Erdinc, Yunlin Zeng, Abhinav Prakash Gahlot, Felix J. Herrmann,
• Abstract summary: We propose a score-based generative algorithm for sampling from power-scaled priors and likelihoods within the Bayesian inference framework.<n>Specifically, we focus on seismic velocity models conditioned on imaged seismic.
• Score: 0.22499166814992438
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose a score-based generative algorithm for sampling from power-scaled priors and likelihoods within the Bayesian inference framework. Our algorithm enables flexible control over prior-likelihood influence without requiring retraining for different power-scaling configurations. Specifically, we focus on synthesizing seismic velocity models conditioned on imaged seismic. Our method enables sensitivity analysis by sampling from intermediate power posteriors, allowing us to assess the relative influence of the prior and likelihood on samples of the posterior distribution. Through a comprehensive set of experiments, we evaluate the effects of varying the power parameter in different settings: applying it solely to the prior, to the likelihood of a Bayesian formulation, and to both simultaneously. The results show that increasing the power of the likelihood up to a certain threshold improves the fidelity of posterior samples to the conditioning data (e.g., seismic images), while decreasing the prior power promotes greater structural diversity among samples. Moreover, we find that moderate scaling of the likelihood leads to a reduced shot data residual, confirming its utility in posterior refinement.

Related papers

• Variance-Reduced Diffusion Sampling via Target Score Identity [0.0]
  We study variance reduction for score estimation and diffusion-based sampling in settings where the clean (target) score is available or can be approximated.<n>We develop a plug-and-play nonparametric self-normalized importance sampling estimator compatible with standard reverse-time solvers.<n> Experiments on synthetic targets and PDE-governed inverse problems demonstrate improved sample quality for a fixed simulation budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-04T16:46:31Z)
• Noise Conditional Variational Score Distillation [60.38982038894823]
  Noise Conditional Variational Score Distillation (NCVSD) is a novel method for distilling pretrained diffusion models into generative denoisers.<n>By integrating this insight into the Variational Score Distillation framework, we enable scalable learning of generative denoisers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T06:01:39Z)
• Generative Modeling with Bayesian Sample Inference [50.07758840675341]
  We derive a novel generative model from the simple act of Gaussian posterior inference. Treating the generated sample as an unknown variable to infer lets us formulate the sampling process in the language of Bayesian probability. Our model uses a sequence of prediction and posterior update steps to narrow down the unknown sample from a broad initial belief.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T14:27:10Z)
• Amortized Posterior Sampling with Diffusion Prior Distillation [55.03585818289934]
  Amortized Posterior Sampling is a novel variational inference approach for efficient posterior sampling in inverse problems.<n>Our method trains a conditional flow model to minimize the divergence between the variational distribution and the posterior distribution implicitly defined by the diffusion model.<n>Unlike existing methods, our approach is unsupervised, requires no paired training data, and is applicable to both Euclidean and non-Euclidean domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T09:53:12Z)
• Self-Guided Generation of Minority Samples Using Diffusion Models [57.319845580050924]
  We present a novel approach for generating minority samples that live on low-density regions of a data manifold. Our framework is built upon diffusion models, leveraging the principle of guided sampling. Experiments on benchmark real datasets demonstrate that our approach can greatly improve the capability of creating realistic low-likelihood minority instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T10:03:29Z)
• Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation [53.27596811146316]
  Diffusion models operate over a sequence of timesteps instead of instantaneous input-output relationships in previous contexts. We present Diffusion-TracIn that incorporates this temporal dynamics and observe that samples' loss gradient norms are highly dependent on timestep. We introduce Diffusion-ReTrac as a re-normalized adaptation that enables the retrieval of training samples more targeted to the test sample of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T07:58:18Z)
• Unmasking Bias in Diffusion Model Training [40.90066994983719]
  Denoising diffusion models have emerged as a dominant approach for image generation. They still suffer from slow convergence in training and color shift issues in sampling. In this paper, we identify that these obstacles can be largely attributed to bias and suboptimality inherent in the default training paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T16:04:41Z)
• Variational Classification [51.2541371924591]
  We derive a variational objective to train the model, analogous to the evidence lower bound (ELBO) used to train variational auto-encoders. Treating inputs to the softmax layer as samples of a latent variable, our abstracted perspective reveals a potential inconsistency. We induce a chosen latent distribution, instead of the implicit assumption found in a standard softmax layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T17:47:19Z)
• Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Counterfactual Estimation [12.159830463756341]
  We propose a probabilistic paradigm to estimate a diverse set of counterfactuals. We treat the perturbations as random variables endowed with prior distribution functions. A gradient based sampler with superior convergence characteristics efficiently computes the posterior samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-21T00:21:11Z)
• How Tempering Fixes Data Augmentation in Bayesian Neural Networks [22.188535244056016]
  We show that tempering implicitly reduces the misspecification arising from modeling augmentations as i.i.d. data. The temperature mimics the role of the effective sample size, reflecting the gain in information provided by the augmentations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T11:06:56Z)
• Conditional Variational Autoencoder for Learned Image Reconstruction [5.487951901731039]
  We develop a novel framework that approximates the posterior distribution of the unknown image at each query observation. It handles implicit noise models and priors, it incorporates the data formation process (i.e., the forward operator), and the learned reconstructive properties are transferable between different datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T10:02:48Z)
• Sampling-free Variational Inference for Neural Networks with Multiplicative Activation Noise [51.080620762639434]
  We propose a more efficient parameterization of the posterior approximation for sampling-free variational inference. Our approach yields competitive results for standard regression problems and scales well to large-scale image classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T16:16:18Z)
• Sparse Bayesian Causal Forests for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation [0.0]
  This paper develops a sparsity-inducing version of Bayesian Causal Forests. It is designed to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T15:24:50Z)
• Leveraging Global Parameters for Flow-based Neural Posterior Estimation [90.21090932619695]
  Inferring the parameters of a model based on experimental observations is central to the scientific method. A particularly challenging setting is when the model is strongly indeterminate, i.e., when distinct sets of parameters yield identical observations. We present a method for cracking such indeterminacy by exploiting additional information conveyed by an auxiliary set of observations sharing global parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T12:23:13Z)
• A deep-learning based Bayesian approach to seismic imaging and uncertainty quantification [0.4588028371034407]
  Uncertainty is essential when dealing with ill-conditioned inverse problems. It is often not possible to formulate a prior distribution that precisely encodes our prior knowledge about the unknown. We propose to use the functional form of a randomly convolutional neural network as an implicit structured prior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T23:46:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.