Bias Beyond English: Evaluating Social Bias and Debiasing Methods in a Low-Resource Setting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11183v2
• Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:35:01 GMT
• Title: Bias Beyond English: Evaluating Social Bias and Debiasing Methods in a Low-Resource Setting
• Authors: Ej Zhou, Weiming Lu,
• Abstract summary: Social bias in language models can potentially exacerbate social inequalities.<n>This study aims to leverage high-resource language corpora to evaluate bias and experiment with debiasing methods in low-resource languages.
• Score: 8.478711218359532
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social bias in language models can potentially exacerbate social inequalities. Despite it having garnered wide attention, most research focuses on English data. In a low-resource scenario, the models often perform worse due to insufficient training data. This study aims to leverage high-resource language corpora to evaluate bias and experiment with debiasing methods in low-resource languages. We evaluated the performance of recent multilingual models in five languages: English, Chinese, Russian, Indonesian and Thai, and analyzed four bias dimensions: gender, religion, nationality, and race-color. By constructing multilingual bias evaluation datasets, this study allows fair comparisons between models across languages. We have further investigated three debiasing methods-CDA, Dropout, SenDeb-and demonstrated that debiasing methods from high-resource languages can be effectively transferred to low-resource ones, providing actionable insights for fairness research in multilingual NLP.

Related papers

• From Measurement to Mitigation: Exploring the Transferability of Debiasing Approaches to Gender Bias in Maltese Language Models [0.0]
  This research investigates the transferability of debiasing methods to Maltese language models.<n>We use benchmarks such as CrowS-Pairs and SEAT, alongside debiasing methods Counterfactual Data Augmentation, Dropout Regularization, Auto-Debias, and GuiDebias.<n>Our findings highlight the challenges of applying existing bias mitigation methods to linguistically complex languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T19:45:01Z)
• Assessing Agentic Large Language Models in Multilingual National Bias [31.67058518564021]
  Cross-language disparities in reasoning-based recommendations remain largely unexplored.<n>This study is the first to address this gap.<n>We investigate multilingual bias in state-of-the-art LLMs by analyzing their responses to decision-making tasks across multiple languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T08:07:42Z)
• Spoken Stereoset: On Evaluating Social Bias Toward Speaker in Speech Large Language Models [50.40276881893513]
  This study introduces Spoken Stereoset, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate social biases in Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) By examining how different models respond to speech from diverse demographic groups, we aim to identify these biases. The findings indicate that while most models show minimal bias, some still exhibit slightly stereotypical or anti-stereotypical tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:55:06Z)
• Zero-shot Sentiment Analysis in Low-Resource Languages Using a Multilingual Sentiment Lexicon [78.12363425794214]
  We focus on zero-shot sentiment analysis tasks across 34 languages, including 6 high/medium-resource languages, 25 low-resource languages, and 3 code-switching datasets. We demonstrate that pretraining using multilingual lexicons, without using any sentence-level sentiment data, achieves superior zero-shot performance compared to models fine-tuned on English sentiment datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T10:41:05Z)
• Multilingual Text-to-Image Generation Magnifies Gender Stereotypes and Prompt Engineering May Not Help You [64.74707085021858]
  We show that multilingual models suffer from significant gender biases just as monolingual models do. We propose a novel benchmark, MAGBIG, intended to foster research on gender bias in multilingual models. Our results show that not only do models exhibit strong gender biases but they also behave differently across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T12:02:28Z)
• Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages [69.18461982439031]
  This work will lay the foundation for furthering the field of dialectal NLP by laying out evident disparities and identifying possible pathways for addressing them through mindful data collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T17:42:01Z)
• Investigating Bias in Multilingual Language Models: Cross-Lingual Transfer of Debiasing Techniques [3.9673530817103333]
  Cross-lingual transfer of debiasing techniques is not only feasible but also yields promising results. Using translations of the CrowS-Pairs dataset, our analysis identifies SentenceDebias as the best technique across different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T11:43:30Z)
• NusaWrites: Constructing High-Quality Corpora for Underrepresented and Extremely Low-Resource Languages [54.808217147579036]
  We conduct a case study on Indonesian local languages. We compare the effectiveness of online scraping, human translation, and paragraph writing by native speakers in constructing datasets. Our findings demonstrate that datasets generated through paragraph writing by native speakers exhibit superior quality in terms of lexical diversity and cultural content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T14:42:33Z)
• On Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Biases in Multilingual Settings [5.248564173595024]
  We investigate some of the challenges with evaluating and mitigating biases in multilingual settings. We first create a benchmark for evaluating gender biases in pre-trained masked language models. We extend various debiasing methods to work beyond English and evaluate their effectiveness for SOTA massively multilingual models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T06:23:04Z)
• CBBQ: A Chinese Bias Benchmark Dataset Curated with Human-AI Collaboration for Large Language Models [52.25049362267279]
  We present a Chinese Bias Benchmark dataset that consists of over 100K questions jointly constructed by human experts and generative language models. The testing instances in the dataset are automatically derived from 3K+ high-quality templates manually authored with stringent quality control. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the dataset in detecting model bias, with all 10 publicly available Chinese large language models exhibiting strong bias in certain categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T14:14:44Z)
• Comparing Biases and the Impact of Multilingual Training across Multiple Languages [70.84047257764405]
  We present a bias analysis across Italian, Chinese, English, Hebrew, and Spanish on the downstream sentiment analysis task. We adapt existing sentiment bias templates in English to Italian, Chinese, Hebrew, and Spanish for four attributes: race, religion, nationality, and gender. Our results reveal similarities in bias expression such as favoritism of groups that are dominant in each language's culture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T18:15:07Z)
• Average Is Not Enough: Caveats of Multilingual Evaluation [0.0]
  We argue that a qualitative analysis informed by comparative linguistics is needed for multilingual results to detect this kind of bias. We show in our case study that results in published works can indeed be linguistically biased and we demonstrate that visualization based on onEL typological database can detect it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T18:23:42Z)
• An Analysis of Social Biases Present in BERT Variants Across Multiple Languages [0.0]
  We investigate the bias present in monolingual BERT models across a diverse set of languages. We propose a template-based method to measure any kind of bias, based on sentence pseudo-likelihood. We conclude that current methods of probing for bias are highly language-dependent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T23:38:08Z)
• No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation [69.28110770760506]
  We create datasets and models aimed at narrowing the performance gap between low and high-resource languages. We propose multiple architectural and training improvements to counteract overfitting while training on thousands of tasks. Our model achieves an improvement of 44% BLEU relative to the previous state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T07:33:36Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
• Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfer [101.58431011820755]
  We study gender bias in multilingual embeddings and how it affects transfer learning for NLP applications. We create a multilingual dataset for bias analysis and propose several ways for quantifying bias in multilingual representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-02T04:34:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.