On Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Biases in Multilingual Settings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01503v1
• Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 06:23:04 GMT
• Title: On Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Biases in Multilingual Settings
• Authors: Aniket Vashishtha, Kabir Ahuja, Sunayana Sitaram
• Abstract summary: We investigate some of the challenges with evaluating and mitigating biases in multilingual settings. We first create a benchmark for evaluating gender biases in pre-trained masked language models. We extend various debiasing methods to work beyond English and evaluate their effectiveness for SOTA massively multilingual models.
• Score: 5.248564173595024
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While understanding and removing gender biases in language models has been a long-standing problem in Natural Language Processing, prior research work has primarily been limited to English. In this work, we investigate some of the challenges with evaluating and mitigating biases in multilingual settings which stem from a lack of existing benchmarks and resources for bias evaluation beyond English especially for non-western context. In this paper, we first create a benchmark for evaluating gender biases in pre-trained masked language models by extending DisCo to different Indian languages using human annotations. We extend various debiasing methods to work beyond English and evaluate their effectiveness for SOTA massively multilingual models on our proposed metric. Overall, our work highlights the challenges that arise while studying social biases in multilingual settings and provides resources as well as mitigation techniques to take a step toward scaling to more languages.

Related papers

• What is Your Favorite Gender, MLM? Gender Bias Evaluation in Multilingual Masked Language Models [8.618945530676614]
  This paper proposes an approach to estimate gender bias in multilingual lexicons from 5 languages: Chinese, English, German, Portuguese, and Spanish. A novel model-based method is presented to generate sentence pairs for a more robust analysis of gender bias. Our results suggest that gender bias should be studied on a large dataset using multiple evaluation metrics for best practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T21:12:08Z)
• Multilingual Text-to-Image Generation Magnifies Gender Stereotypes and Prompt Engineering May Not Help You [64.74707085021858]
  We show that multilingual models suffer from significant gender biases just as monolingual models do. We propose a novel benchmark, MAGBIG, intended to foster research on gender bias in multilingual models. Our results show that not only do models exhibit strong gender biases but they also behave differently across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T12:02:28Z)
• Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages [69.18461982439031]
  This work will lay the foundation for furthering the field of dialectal NLP by laying out evident disparities and identifying possible pathways for addressing them through mindful data collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T17:42:01Z)
• Investigating Bias in Multilingual Language Models: Cross-Lingual Transfer of Debiasing Techniques [3.9673530817103333]
  Cross-lingual transfer of debiasing techniques is not only feasible but also yields promising results. Using translations of the CrowS-Pairs dataset, our analysis identifies SentenceDebias as the best technique across different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T11:43:30Z)
• Target-Agnostic Gender-Aware Contrastive Learning for Mitigating Bias in Multilingual Machine Translation [28.471506840241602]
  Gender bias is a significant issue in machine translation, leading to ongoing research efforts in developing bias mitigation techniques. We propose a bias mitigation method based on a novel approach. Gender-Aware Contrastive Learning, GACL, encodes contextual gender information into the representations of non-explicit gender words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T12:53:39Z)
• Fairness in Language Models Beyond English: Gaps and Challenges [11.62418844341466]
  This paper presents a survey of fairness in multilingual and non-English contexts. It highlights the shortcomings of current research and the difficulties faced by methods designed for English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T11:25:50Z)
• An Analysis of Social Biases Present in BERT Variants Across Multiple Languages [0.0]
  We investigate the bias present in monolingual BERT models across a diverse set of languages. We propose a template-based method to measure any kind of bias, based on sentence pseudo-likelihood. We conclude that current methods of probing for bias are highly language-dependent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T23:38:08Z)
• Analyzing the Limits of Self-Supervision in Handling Bias in Language [52.26068057260399]
  We evaluate how well language models capture the semantics of four tasks for bias: diagnosis, identification, extraction and rephrasing. Our analyses indicate that language models are capable of performing these tasks to widely varying degrees across different bias dimensions, such as gender and political affiliation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T05:36:08Z)
• AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
  We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context. It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts. Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z)
• Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfer [101.58431011820755]
  We study gender bias in multilingual embeddings and how it affects transfer learning for NLP applications. We create a multilingual dataset for bias analysis and propose several ways for quantifying bias in multilingual representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-02T04:34:37Z)
• XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalization [128.37244072182506]
  Cross-lingual TRansfer Evaluation of Multilinguals XTREME is a benchmark for evaluating the cross-lingual generalization capabilities of multilingual representations across 40 languages and 9 tasks. We demonstrate that while models tested on English reach human performance on many tasks, there is still a sizable gap in the performance of cross-lingually transferred models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-24T19:09:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.