LLMTaxo: Leveraging Large Language Models for Constructing Taxonomy of Factual Claims from Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12325v2
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 02:21:45 GMT
• Title: LLMTaxo: Leveraging Large Language Models for Constructing Taxonomy of Factual Claims from Social Media
• Authors: Haiqi Zhang, Zhengyuan Zhu, Zeyu Zhang, Chengkai Li,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces LLMTaxo, a novel framework leveraging large language models for the automated construction of redundancy of factual claims from social media.<n>The resulting hierarchical structure significantly reduces and improves information accessibility.<n> Evaluations conducted on three diverse datasets demonstrate LLMTaxo's effectiveness in producing clear, coherent, and comprehensive.
• Score: 13.898378166582154
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid expansion of content on social media platforms, analyzing and comprehending online discourse has become increasingly complex. This paper introduces LLMTaxo, a novel framework leveraging large language models for the automated construction of taxonomies of factual claims from social media by generating topics at multiple levels of granularity. The resulting hierarchical structure significantly reduces redundancy and improves information accessibility. We also propose dedicated taxonomy evaluation metrics to enable comprehensive assessment. Evaluations conducted on three diverse datasets demonstrate LLMTaxo's effectiveness in producing clear, coherent, and comprehensive taxonomies. Among the evaluated models, GPT-4o mini consistently outperforms others across most metrics. The framework's flexibility and low reliance on manual intervention underscore its potential for broad applicability.

Related papers

• Scaling Beyond Context: A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Document Understanding [61.36285696607487]
  Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery.<n>Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) face key limitations.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents' multimodal nature, combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T02:33:16Z)
• Context-Aware Hierarchical Taxonomy Generation for Scientific Papers via LLM-Guided Multi-Aspect Clustering [59.54662810933882]
  Existing taxonomy construction methods, leveraging unsupervised clustering or direct prompting of large language models, often lack coherence and granularity.<n>We propose a novel context-aware hierarchical taxonomy generation framework that integrates LLM-guided multi-aspect encoding with dynamic clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T15:12:58Z)
• Iterative Augmentation with Summarization Refinement (IASR) Evaluation for Unstructured Survey data Modeling and Analysis [0.43988112145759295]
  This work introduces a principled evaluation framework for large language model (LLM) based text augmentation.<n> Empirical evaluations show that GPT-3.5 Turbo achieved the best balance of semantic fidelity, diversity, and generation efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T10:49:30Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Definition Extraction with TaxoMatic A Case Study on Media Bias [6.581006293385288]
  TaxoMatic is a framework that automates definition extraction from academic literature.<n>Analysed on a dataset of 2,398 manually rated articles, Claude-3-sonnet achieved the best results in both relevance classification and definition extraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T01:47:16Z)
• Graph Foundation Models for Recommendation: A Comprehensive Survey [55.70529188101446]
  Large language models (LLMs) are designed to process and comprehend natural language, making both approaches highly effective and widely adopted. Recent research has focused on graph foundation models (GFMs) GFMs integrate the strengths of GNNs and LLMs to model complex RS problems more efficiently by leveraging the graph-based structure of user-item relationships alongside textual understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T12:13:51Z)
• Bridging the Evaluation Gap: Leveraging Large Language Models for Topic Model Evaluation [0.0]
  This study presents a framework for automated evaluation of dynamically evolving topic in scientific literature using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The proposed approach harnesses LLMs to measure key quality dimensions, such as coherence, repetitiveness, diversity, and topic-document alignment, without heavy reliance on expert annotators or narrow statistical metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T08:23:56Z)
• Personalized Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey [127.9521218125761]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become increasingly important due to their state-of-the-art performance and ability to integrate multiple data modalities.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey on personalized multimodal large language models, focusing on their architecture, training methods, and applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T03:59:03Z)
• A Survey of Small Language Models [104.80308007044634]
  Small Language Models (SLMs) have become increasingly important due to their efficiency and performance to perform various language tasks with minimal computational resources. We present a comprehensive survey on SLMs, focusing on their architectures, training techniques, and model compression techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T23:52:28Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z)
• Towards Realistic Synthetic User-Generated Content: A Scaffolding Approach to Generating Online Discussions [17.96479268328824]
  We investigate the feasibility of creating realistic, large-scale synthetic datasets of user-generated content. We propose a multi-step generation process, predicated on the idea of creating compact representations of discussion threads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T18:43:50Z)
• FLAME: Self-Supervised Low-Resource Taxonomy Expansion using Large Language Models [19.863010475923414]
  Taxonomies find utility in various real-world applications, such as e-commerce search engines and recommendation systems. Traditional supervised taxonomy expansion approaches encounter difficulties stemming from limited resources. We propose FLAME, a novel approach for taxonomy expansion in low-resource environments by harnessing the capabilities of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:50:40Z)
• Analysis of Multidomain Abstractive Summarization Using Salience Allocation [2.6880540371111445]
  Season is a model designed to enhance summarization by leveraging salience allocation techniques. This paper employs various evaluation metrics such as ROUGE, METEOR, BERTScore, and MoverScore to evaluate the performance of these models fine-tuned for generating abstractive summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T08:52:12Z)
• Understanding Survey Paper Taxonomy about Large Language Models via Graph Representation Learning [2.88268082568407]
  We develop a method to automatically assign survey papers to a taxonomy. Our work indicates that leveraging graph structure information on co-category graphs can significantly outperform the language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T02:21:59Z)
• Contextualization Distillation from Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Completion [51.126166442122546]
  We introduce the Contextualization Distillation strategy, a plug-in-and-play approach compatible with both discriminative and generative KGC frameworks. Our method begins by instructing large language models to transform compact, structural triplets into context-rich segments. Comprehensive evaluations across diverse datasets and KGC techniques highlight the efficacy and adaptability of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T08:56:49Z)
• Disentangled Representation Learning with Large Language Models for Text-Attributed Graphs [57.052160123387104]
  We present the Disentangled Graph-Text Learner (DGTL) model, which is able to enhance the reasoning and predicting capabilities of LLMs for TAGs. Our proposed DGTL model incorporates graph structure information through tailored disentangled graph neural network (GNN) layers. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed DGTL model on achieving superior or comparable performance over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T14:00:04Z)
• Prompting or Fine-tuning? A Comparative Study of Large Language Models for Taxonomy Construction [0.8670827427401335]
  We present a general framework for taxonomy construction that takes into account structural constraints. We compare the prompting and fine-tuning approaches performed on a hypernym taxonomy and a novel computer science taxonomy dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T16:53:17Z)
• Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
  We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs) We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
• ConvoSumm: Conversation Summarization Benchmark and Improved Abstractive Summarization with Argument Mining [61.82562838486632]
  We crowdsource four new datasets on diverse online conversation forms of news comments, discussion forums, community question answering forums, and email threads. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on our datasets and analyze characteristics associated with the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:17:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.