Translating Multimodal AI into Real-World Inspection: TEMAI Evaluation Framework and Pathways for Implementation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13873v1
• Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:30:56 GMT
• Title: Translating Multimodal AI into Real-World Inspection: TEMAI Evaluation Framework and Pathways for Implementation
• Authors: Zehan Li, Jinzhi Deng, Haibing Ma, Chi Zhang, Dan Xiao,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Translational Evaluation of Multimodal AI for Inspection framework.<n>It bridges multimodal AI capabilities with industrial inspection implementation.<n>The framework demonstrates that technical capability alone yields limited value without corresponding adoption mechanisms.
• Score: 3.848879161330863
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces the Translational Evaluation of Multimodal AI for Inspection (TEMAI) framework, bridging multimodal AI capabilities with industrial inspection implementation. Adapting translational research principles from healthcare to industrial contexts, TEMAI establishes three core dimensions: Capability (technical feasibility), Adoption (organizational readiness), and Utility (value realization). The framework demonstrates that technical capability alone yields limited value without corresponding adoption mechanisms. TEMAI incorporates specialized metrics including the Value Density Coefficient and structured implementation pathways. Empirical validation through retail and photovoltaic inspection implementations revealed significant differences in value realization patterns despite similar capability reduction rates, confirming the framework's effectiveness across diverse industrial sectors while highlighting the importance of industry-specific adaptation strategies.

Related papers

• Unified modality separation: A vision-language framework for unsupervised domain adaptation [60.8391821117794]
  Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) enables models trained on a labeled source domain to handle new unlabeled domains.<n>We propose a unified modality separation framework that accommodates both modality-specific and modality-invariant components.<n>Our methods achieve up to 9% performance gain with 9 times of computational efficiencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T02:51:10Z)
• Transparent AI: The Case for Interpretability and Explainability [0.1505692475853115]
  We present key insights and lessons learned from practical interpretability applications across diverse domains.<n>This paper offers actionable strategies and implementation guidance tailored to organizations at varying stages of AI maturity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T13:22:14Z)
• Discrete Tokenization for Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Survey [69.45421620616486]
  This work presents the first structured taxonomy and analysis of discrete tokenization methods designed for large language models (LLMs)<n>We categorize 8 representative VQ variants that span classical and modern paradigms and analyze their algorithmic principles, training dynamics, and integration challenges with LLM pipelines.<n>We identify key challenges including codebook collapse, unstable gradient estimation, and modality-specific encoding constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T10:52:14Z)
• A Conceptual Framework for AI Capability Evaluations [0.0]
  We propose a conceptual framework for analyzing AI capability evaluations.<n>It offers a structured, descriptive approach that systematizes the analysis of widely used methods and terminology.<n>It also enables researchers to identify methodological weaknesses, assists practitioners in designing evaluations, and provides policymakers with a tool to scrutinize, compare, and navigate complex evaluation landscapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T00:19:27Z)
• TransBench: Benchmarking Machine Translation for Industrial-Scale Applications [39.03233118476432]
  Machine translation (MT) has become indispensable for cross-border communication in globalized industries like e-commerce, finance, and legal services.<n>Applying general-purpose MT models to industrial scenarios reveals critical limitations due to domain-specific terminology, cultural nuances, and stylistic conventions absent in generic benchmarks.<n>Existing evaluation frameworks inadequately assess translation in specialized contexts, creating a gap between academic benchmarks and real-world efficacy.<n>We introduce TransBench, a benchmark for industrial MT, initially targeting international e-commerce with 17,000 sentences spanning 4 main scenarios and 33 language pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T11:54:58Z)
• Beyond Factual Accuracy: Evaluating Coverage of Diverse Factual Information in Long-form Text Generation [56.82274763974443]
  ICAT is an evaluation framework for measuring coverage of diverse factual information in long-form text generation.<n>It computes the alignment between the atomic factual claims and various aspects expected to be presented in the output.<n>Our framework offers interpretable and fine-grained analysis of diversity and coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T05:43:23Z)
• TOAST Framework: A Multidimensional Approach to Ethical and Sustainable AI Integration in Organizations [0.38073142980732994]
  This paper introduces the Trustworthy, Optimized, Adaptable, and Socio-Technologically harmonious (TOAST) framework. It focuses on reliability, accountability, technical advancement, adaptability, and socio-technical harmony. By grounding the TOAST framework in healthcare case studies, this paper provides a robust evaluation of its practicality and theoretical soundness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T05:13:39Z)
• A Unified Framework for Evaluating the Effectiveness and Enhancing the Transparency of Explainable AI Methods in Real-World Applications [2.0681376988193843]
  "Black box" characteristic of AI models constrains interpretability, transparency, and reliability.<n>This study presents a unified XAI evaluation framework to evaluate correctness, interpretability, robustness, fairness, and completeness of explanations generated by AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T05:30:10Z)
• Explainability in AI Based Applications: A Framework for Comparing Different Techniques [2.5874041837241304]
  In business applications, the challenge lies in selecting an appropriate explainability method that balances comprehensibility with accuracy. This paper proposes a novel method for the assessment of the agreement of different explainability techniques. By providing a practical framework for understanding the agreement of diverse explainability techniques, our research aims to facilitate the broader integration of interpretable AI systems in business applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T09:45:34Z)
• Ethical and Scalable Automation: A Governance and Compliance Framework for Business Applications [0.0]
  This paper introduces a framework ensuring that AI must be ethical, controllable, viable, and desirable.<n>Different case studies validate this framework by integrating AI in both academic and practical environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T12:39:28Z)
• Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices [55.319842359034546]
  Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices. The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment. It is positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T11:13:52Z)
• Unified Language-driven Zero-shot Domain Adaptation [55.64088594551629]
  Unified Language-driven Zero-shot Domain Adaptation (ULDA) is a novel task setting. It enables a single model to adapt to diverse target domains without explicit domain-ID knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T16:44:11Z)
• Towards a Responsible AI Metrics Catalogue: A Collection of Metrics for AI Accountability [28.67753149592534]
  This study bridges the accountability gap by introducing our effort towards a comprehensive metrics catalogue. Our catalogue delineates process metrics that underpin procedural integrity, resource metrics that provide necessary tools and frameworks, and product metrics that reflect the outputs of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T04:43:16Z)
• Universal Information Extraction as Unified Semantic Matching [54.19974454019611]
  We decouple information extraction into two abilities, structuring and conceptualizing, which are shared by different tasks and schemas. Based on this paradigm, we propose to universally model various IE tasks with Unified Semantic Matching framework. In this way, USM can jointly encode schema and input text, uniformly extract substructures in parallel, and controllably decode target structures on demand.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T11:51:31Z)
• Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systems [76.79703106646967]
  We develop a value-based assessment framework that visualizes closeness and tensions between values. We give guidelines on how to operationalize them, while opening up the evaluation and deliberation process to a wide range of stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T19:28:32Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Multisource AI Scorecard Table for System Evaluation [3.74397577716445]
  The paper describes a Multisource AI Scorecard Table (MAST) that provides the developer and user of an artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) system with a standard checklist. The paper explores how the analytic tradecraft standards outlined in Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 203 can provide a framework for assessing the performance of an AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T03:37:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.