Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04794v1
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 11:13:52 GMT
- Title: Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices
- Authors: Florian Hellmeier, Kay Brosien, Carsten Eickhoff, Alexander Meyer,
- Abstract summary: Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices.
The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment.
It is positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes.
- Score: 55.319842359034546
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Prognostic and diagnostic AI-based medical devices hold immense promise for advancing healthcare, yet their rapid development has outpaced the establishment of appropriate validation methods. Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices and ensuring their effective, continued operation in real-world settings. Building on recent discussions around the validation of AI models in medicine and drawing from validation practices in other fields, a framework to address this gap is presented. It offers a structured, robust approach to validation that helps ensure device reliability across differing clinical environments. The primary challenges to device performance upon deployment are discussed while highlighting the impact of changes related to individual healthcare institutions and operational processes. The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment, aiming to mitigate these issues while being adaptable to challenges unforeseen during device development. The framework is also positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes, underscoring its practical viability and relevance considering regulatory requirements. Additionally, a practical example demonstrating potential benefits of the framework is presented. Lastly, guidance on assessing model performance is offered and the importance of involving clinical stakeholders in the validation and fine-tuning process is discussed.
Related papers
- Towards Reliable Medical Question Answering: Techniques and Challenges in Mitigating Hallucinations in Language Models [1.03590082373586]
This paper conducts a scoping study of existing techniques for mitigating hallucinations in knowledge-based task in general and especially for medical domains.
Key methods covered in the paper include Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based techniques, iterative feedback loops, supervised fine-tuning, and prompt engineering.
These techniques, while promising in general contexts, require further adaptation and optimization for the medical domain due to its unique demands for up-to-date, specialized knowledge and strict adherence to medical guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-25T11:09:15Z) - Explainable Transformer Prototypes for Medical Diagnoses [7.680878119988482]
Self-attention feature of transformers contributes towards identifying crucial regions during the classification process.
Our research endeavors to innovate a unique attention block that underscores the correlation between'regions' rather than 'pixels'
A combined quantitative and qualitative methodological approach was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on a large-scale NIH chest X-ray dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T17:46:21Z) - RAISE -- Radiology AI Safety, an End-to-end lifecycle approach [5.829180249228172]
The integration of AI into radiology introduces opportunities for improved clinical care provision and efficiency.
The focus should be on ensuring models meet the highest standards of safety, effectiveness and efficacy.
The roadmap presented herein aims to expedite the achievement of deployable, reliable, and safe AI in radiology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-24T15:59:14Z) - Testing learning-enabled cyber-physical systems with Large-Language Models: A Formal Approach [32.15663640443728]
The integration of machine learning (ML) into cyber-physical systems (CPS) offers significant benefits.
Existing verification and validation techniques are often inadequate for these new paradigms.
We propose a roadmap to transition from foundational probabilistic testing to a more rigorous approach capable of delivering formal assurance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T14:56:14Z) - Clairvoyance: A Pipeline Toolkit for Medical Time Series [95.22483029602921]
Time-series learning is the bread and butter of data-driven *clinical decision support*
Clairvoyance proposes a unified, end-to-end, autoML-friendly pipeline that serves as a software toolkit.
Clairvoyance is the first to demonstrate viability of a comprehensive and automatable pipeline for clinical time-series ML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-28T12:08:03Z) - Better Practices for Domain Adaptation [62.70267990659201]
Domain adaptation (DA) aims to provide frameworks for adapting models to deployment data without using labels.
Unclear validation protocol for DA has led to bad practices in the literature.
We show challenges across all three branches of domain adaptation methodology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T17:44:18Z) - Validation-Driven Development [54.50263643323]
This paper introduces a validation-driven development (VDD) process that prioritizes validating requirements in formal development.
The effectiveness of the VDD process is demonstrated through a case study in the aviation industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-11T09:15:26Z) - Safe AI for health and beyond -- Monitoring to transform a health
service [51.8524501805308]
We will assess the infrastructure required to monitor the outputs of a machine learning algorithm.
We will present two scenarios with examples of monitoring and updates of models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T17:27:45Z) - Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare
professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical
decision-making [1.7809957179929814]
This paper contributes with a pragmatic evaluation framework for explainable Machine Learning (ML) models for clinical decision support.
The study revealed a more nuanced role for ML explanation models, when these are pragmatically embedded in the clinical context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T11:59:04Z) - Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using
Generative Adversarial Networks [103.14809802212535]
We build on the generative adversarial networks (GANs) framework to address the problem of estimating the effect of continuous-valued interventions.
Our model, SCIGAN, is flexible and capable of simultaneously estimating counterfactual outcomes for several different continuous interventions.
To address the challenges presented by shifting to continuous interventions, we propose a novel architecture for our discriminator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T18:46:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.