Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04794v1
• Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 11:13:52 GMT
• Title: Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices
• Authors: Florian Hellmeier, Kay Brosien, Carsten Eickhoff, Alexander Meyer,
• Abstract summary: Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices. The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment. It is positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes.
• Score: 55.319842359034546
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Prognostic and diagnostic AI-based medical devices hold immense promise for advancing healthcare, yet their rapid development has outpaced the establishment of appropriate validation methods. Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices and ensuring their effective, continued operation in real-world settings. Building on recent discussions around the validation of AI models in medicine and drawing from validation practices in other fields, a framework to address this gap is presented. It offers a structured, robust approach to validation that helps ensure device reliability across differing clinical environments. The primary challenges to device performance upon deployment are discussed while highlighting the impact of changes related to individual healthcare institutions and operational processes. The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment, aiming to mitigate these issues while being adaptable to challenges unforeseen during device development. The framework is also positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes, underscoring its practical viability and relevance considering regulatory requirements. Additionally, a practical example demonstrating potential benefits of the framework is presented. Lastly, guidance on assessing model performance is offered and the importance of involving clinical stakeholders in the validation and fine-tuning process is discussed.

Related papers

• A Multi-Agent Framework for Interpreting Multivariate Physiological Time Series [9.72130666902599]
  We present Vivaldi, a role-structured multi-agent system that explains multivariate physiological time series.<n>Our experiments show that agentic pipelines substantially benefit non-thinking and medically fine-tuned models.<n>We find that explicit tool-based computation is decisive for codifiable clinical metrics, whereas subjective targets, such as pain scores and length of stay, show limited or inconsistent changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T14:55:46Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• MedConsultBench: A Full-Cycle, Fine-Grained, Process-Aware Benchmark for Medical Consultation Agents [10.109613967215447]
  We propose MedConsultBench, a comprehensive framework designed to evaluate the complete online consultation cycle.<n>Our methodology introduces Atomic Information Units (AIUs) to track clinical information acquisition at a sub-turn level.<n>By addressing the underspecification and ambiguity inherent in online consultations, the benchmark evaluates uncertainty-aware yet concise inquiry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T02:18:10Z)
• Benchmarking Egocentric Clinical Intent Understanding Capability for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [48.95516224614331]
  We introduce MedGaze-Bench, the first benchmark leveraging clinician gaze as a Cognitive Cursor to assess intent understanding across surgery, emergency simulation, and diagnostic interpretation.<n>Our benchmark addresses three fundamental challenges: visual homogeneity of anatomical structures, strict temporal-causal dependencies in clinical, and implicit adherence to safety protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T02:20:40Z)
• Intervention Efficiency and Perturbation Validation Framework: Capacity-Aware and Robust Clinical Model Selection under the Rashomon Effect [8.16102315566872]
  coexistence of multiple models with comparable performance poses fundamental challenges for trustworthy deployment and evaluation.<n>We propose two complementary tools for robust model assessment and selection: Intervention Efficiency (IE) and the Perturbation Validation Framework (PVF)<n>IE is a capacity-aware metric that quantifies how efficiently a model identifies actionable true positives when only limited interventions are feasible.<n>PVF introduces a structured approach to assess the stability of models under data perturbations, identifying models whose performance remains most invariant across noisy or shifted validation sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T10:21:07Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Expert Control: Enhancing the Reliability of Medical Vision-Language Models [52.2001050216955]
  Existing methods aim to enhance the performance of Medical Vision Language Model (MedVLM) by adjusting model structure, fine-tuning with high-quality data, or through preference fine-tuning.<n>We propose an expert-in-the-loop framework named Expert-Controlled-Free Guidance (Expert-CFG) to align MedVLM with clinical expertise without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:03:30Z)
• Prompt Mechanisms in Medical Imaging: A Comprehensive Survey [18.072753363565322]
  Deep learning offers transformative potential in medical imaging.<n>Yet its clinical adoption is frequently hampered by challenges such as data scarcity, distribution shifts, and the need for robust task generalization.<n>Prompt-based methodologies have emerged as a pivotal strategy to guide deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-28T03:06:25Z)
• GEMeX-RMCoT: An Enhanced Med-VQA Dataset for Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [60.03671205298294]
  Medical visual question answering aims to support clinical decision-making by enabling models to answer natural language questions based on medical images.<n>Current methods still suffer from limited answer reliability and poor interpretability.<n>This work first proposes a Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought dataset, in which the process of producing an answer is preceded by a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T08:09:58Z)
• Keeping Medical AI Healthy: A Review of Detection and Correction Methods for System Degradation [6.781778751487079]
  This review presents a forward-looking perspective on monitoring and maintaining the "health" of AI systems in healthcare.<n>We highlight the urgent need for continuous performance monitoring, early degradation detection, and effective self-correction mechanisms.<n>This work aims to guide the development of reliable, robust medical AI systems capable of sustaining safe, long-term deployment in dynamic clinical settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T19:22:07Z)
• Will Large Language Models Transform Clinical Prediction? [6.239284099493876]
  Large language models (LLMs) are attracting increasing interest in healthcare.<n>This commentary evaluates the potential of LLMs to improve clinical prediction models (CPMs) for diagnostic and prognostic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T17:02:04Z)
• Systematic Literature Review on Clinical Trial Eligibility Matching [0.24554686192257422]
  Review highlights how explainable AI and standardized ontology can bolster clinician trust and broaden adoption. Further research into advanced semantic and temporal representations, expanded data integration, and rigorous prospective evaluations is necessary to fully realize the transformative potential of NLP in clinical trial recruitment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T11:45:50Z)
• Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice through Interactive Sequential Benchmarking [58.25862290294702]
  We present MedChain, a dataset of 12,163 clinical cases that covers five key stages of clinical workflow. We also propose MedChain-Agent, an AI system that integrates a feedback mechanism and a MCase-RAG module to learn from previous cases and adapt its responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T15:25:02Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Question Answering: Techniques and Challenges in Mitigating Hallucinations in Language Models [1.03590082373586]
  This paper conducts a scoping study of existing techniques for mitigating hallucinations in knowledge-based task in general and especially for medical domains. Key methods covered in the paper include Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based techniques, iterative feedback loops, supervised fine-tuning, and prompt engineering. These techniques, while promising in general contexts, require further adaptation and optimization for the medical domain due to its unique demands for up-to-date, specialized knowledge and strict adherence to medical guidelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T11:09:15Z)
• A Survey on Medical Large Language Models: Technology, Application, Trustworthiness, and Future Directions [23.36640449085249]
  We trace the recent advances of Medical Large Language Models (Med-LLMs) The wide-ranging applications of Med-LLMs are investigated across various healthcare domains. We discuss the challenges associated with ensuring fairness, accountability, privacy, and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T03:15:13Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Medical Diagnostic Phrase Identification and Grounding [72.18719355481052]
  We introduce a novel task called Medical Report Grounding (MRG)<n>MRG aims to directly identify diagnostic phrases and their corresponding grounding boxes from medical reports in an end-to-end manner.<n>We propose uMedGround, a robust and reliable framework that leverages a multimodal large language model to predict diagnostic phrases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T07:41:35Z)
• Explainable Transformer Prototypes for Medical Diagnoses [7.680878119988482]
  Self-attention feature of transformers contributes towards identifying crucial regions during the classification process. Our research endeavors to innovate a unique attention block that underscores the correlation between'regions' rather than 'pixels' A combined quantitative and qualitative methodological approach was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on a large-scale NIH chest X-ray dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T17:46:21Z)
• RAISE -- Radiology AI Safety, an End-to-end lifecycle approach [5.829180249228172]
  The integration of AI into radiology introduces opportunities for improved clinical care provision and efficiency. The focus should be on ensuring models meet the highest standards of safety, effectiveness and efficacy. The roadmap presented herein aims to expedite the achievement of deployable, reliable, and safe AI in radiology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T15:59:14Z)
• Testing learning-enabled cyber-physical systems with Large-Language Models: A Formal Approach [32.15663640443728]
  The integration of machine learning (ML) into cyber-physical systems (CPS) offers significant benefits. Existing verification and validation techniques are often inadequate for these new paradigms. We propose a roadmap to transition from foundational probabilistic testing to a more rigorous approach capable of delivering formal assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T14:56:14Z)
• Clairvoyance: A Pipeline Toolkit for Medical Time Series [95.22483029602921]
  Time-series learning is the bread and butter of data-driven *clinical decision support* Clairvoyance proposes a unified, end-to-end, autoML-friendly pipeline that serves as a software toolkit. Clairvoyance is the first to demonstrate viability of a comprehensive and automatable pipeline for clinical time-series ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T12:08:03Z)
• Better Practices for Domain Adaptation [62.70267990659201]
  Domain adaptation (DA) aims to provide frameworks for adapting models to deployment data without using labels. Unclear validation protocol for DA has led to bad practices in the literature. We show challenges across all three branches of domain adaptation methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T17:44:18Z)
• Validation-Driven Development [54.50263643323]
  This paper introduces a validation-driven development (VDD) process that prioritizes validating requirements in formal development. The effectiveness of the VDD process is demonstrated through a case study in the aviation industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T09:15:26Z)
• Safe AI for health and beyond -- Monitoring to transform a health service [51.8524501805308]
  We will assess the infrastructure required to monitor the outputs of a machine learning algorithm. We will present two scenarios with examples of monitoring and updates of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:27:45Z)
• Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-making [1.7809957179929814]
  This paper contributes with a pragmatic evaluation framework for explainable Machine Learning (ML) models for clinical decision support. The study revealed a more nuanced role for ML explanation models, when these are pragmatically embedded in the clinical context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T11:59:04Z)
• Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial Networks [103.14809802212535]
  We build on the generative adversarial networks (GANs) framework to address the problem of estimating the effect of continuous-valued interventions. Our model, SCIGAN, is flexible and capable of simultaneously estimating counterfactual outcomes for several different continuous interventions. To address the challenges presented by shifting to continuous interventions, we propose a novel architecture for our discriminator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T18:46:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.