Framework, Standards, Applications and Best practices of Responsible AI : A Comprehensive Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13979v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:23:52 GMT
• Title: Framework, Standards, Applications and Best practices of Responsible AI : A Comprehensive Survey
• Authors: Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, Kapal Dev, Sunder Ali Khowaja, Weizheng Wang, Hailin Feng, Kai Fang, Sharnil Pandya, Wei Wang,
• Abstract summary: RAI is a combination of ethics associated with the usage of artificial intelligence aligned with the common and standard frameworks.<n>Currently, ethical standards and implementation of RAI are decoupled which caters each industry to follow their own standards to use AI ethically.<n>Social pressure and unethical way of using AI forces the RAI design rather than implementation.
• Score: 20.554868638297688
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) is a combination of ethics associated with the usage of artificial intelligence aligned with the common and standard frameworks. This survey paper extensively discusses the global and national standards, applications of RAI, current technology and ongoing projects using RAI, and possible challenges in implementing and designing RAI in the industries and projects based on AI. Currently, ethical standards and implementation of RAI are decoupled which caters each industry to follow their own standards to use AI ethically. Many global firms and government organizations are taking necessary initiatives to design a common and standard framework. Social pressure and unethical way of using AI forces the RAI design rather than implementation.

Related papers

• Who is Responsible? The Data, Models, Users or Regulations? Responsible Generative AI for a Sustainable Future [7.976680307696195]
  Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) has emerged as a crucial framework for addressing ethical concerns in the development and deployment of AI systems.<n>This article examines the challenges and opportunities in implementing ethical, transparent, and accountable AI systems in the post-ChatGPT era.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T20:59:42Z)
• Position: A taxonomy for reporting and describing AI security incidents [57.98317583163334]
  We argue that specific are required to describe and report security incidents of AI systems. Existing frameworks for either non-AI security or generic AI safety incident reporting are insufficient to capture the specific properties of AI security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:50:26Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [55.2480439325792]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders [59.17981603969404]
  The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems. We conduct semi-structured interviews with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts. We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T00:14:37Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Developing and Deploying Industry Standards for Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED): Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions [22.65961106637345]
  The adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) holds the promise of revolutionizing educational practices. The lack of standardized practices in the development and deployment of AIED solutions has led to fragmented ecosystems. This article aims to address the critical need to develop and implement industry standards in AIED.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T22:38:08Z)
• POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems [3.02243271391691]
  There is a significant gap between high-level AI ethics principles and low-level concrete practices for AI professionals. We develop a novel holistic framework for Trustworthy AI - designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Our goal is to empower AI professionals to confidently navigate the ethical dimensions of Trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T01:05:16Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• A Review of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and its Applications in the United States [0.0]
  The paper highlights the impact AI has in every sector of the US economy and the resultant effect on entities spanning businesses, government, academia, and civil society. Our discussion explores eleven fundamental 'ethical principles' structured as overarching themes. These encompass Transparency, Justice, Fairness, Equity, Non- Maleficence, Responsibility, Accountability, Privacy, Beneficence, Freedom, Autonomy, Trust, Dignity, Sustainability, and Solidarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T14:29:00Z)
• A Rapid Review of Responsible AI frameworks: How to guide the development of ethical AI [1.3734044451150018]
  We conduct a rapid review of several frameworks providing principles, guidelines, and/or tools to help practitioners in the development and deployment of Responsible AI (RAI) applications. Our results reveal that there is not a "catching-all" framework supporting both technical and non-technical stakeholders in the implementation of real-world projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:47:18Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.