Developing and Deploying Industry Standards for Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED): Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14689v2
• Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 04:21:13 GMT
• Title: Developing and Deploying Industry Standards for Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED): Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions
• Authors: Richard Tong, Haoyang Li, Joleen Liang, Qingsong Wen,
• Abstract summary: The adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) holds the promise of revolutionizing educational practices. The lack of standardized practices in the development and deployment of AIED solutions has led to fragmented ecosystems. This article aims to address the critical need to develop and implement industry standards in AIED.
• Score: 22.65961106637345
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) holds the promise of revolutionizing educational practices by offering personalized learning experiences, automating administrative and pedagogical tasks, and reducing the cost of content creation. However, the lack of standardized practices in the development and deployment of AIED solutions has led to fragmented ecosystems, which presents challenges in interoperability, scalability, and ethical governance. This article aims to address the critical need to develop and implement industry standards in AIED, offering a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape, challenges, and strategic approaches to overcome these obstacles. We begin by examining the various applications of AIED in various educational settings and identify key areas lacking in standardization, including system interoperability, ontology mapping, data integration, evaluation, and ethical governance. Then, we propose a multi-tiered framework for establishing robust industry standards for AIED. In addition, we discuss methodologies for the iterative development and deployment of standards, incorporating feedback loops from real-world applications to refine and adapt standards over time. The paper also highlights the role of emerging technologies and pedagogical theories in shaping future standards for AIED. Finally, we outline a strategic roadmap for stakeholders to implement these standards, fostering a cohesive and ethical AIED ecosystem. By establishing comprehensive industry standards, such as those by IEEE Artificial Intelligence Standards Committee (AISC) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO), we can accelerate and scale AIED solutions to improve educational outcomes, ensuring that technological advances align with the principles of inclusivity, fairness, and educational excellence.

Related papers

• TOAST Framework: A Multidimensional Approach to Ethical and Sustainable AI Integration in Organizations [0.38073142980732994]
  This paper introduces the Trustworthy, Optimized, Adaptable, and Socio-Technologically harmonious (TOAST) framework. It focuses on reliability, accountability, technical advancement, adaptability, and socio-technical harmony. By grounding the TOAST framework in healthcare case studies, this paper provides a robust evaluation of its practicality and theoretical soundness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T05:13:39Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [55.2480439325792]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms. I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• Diversity and Inclusion in AI for Recruitment: Lessons from Industry Workshop [44.807030880787345]
  This study investigates the practical application of D&I guidelines in AI-driven online job-seeking systems. We conducted a co-design workshop with a large multinational recruitment company. The results suggest developing tailored D&I guidelines and ongoing support to ensure the effective adoption of inclusive AI practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T04:45:47Z)
• POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems [3.02243271391691]
  There is a significant gap between high-level AI ethics principles and low-level concrete practices for AI professionals. We develop a novel holistic framework for Trustworthy AI - designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Our goal is to empower AI professionals to confidently navigate the ethical dimensions of Trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T01:05:16Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Models [46.560886177083084]
  This paper provides an overview of the risks and challenges associated with big models, surveys existing AI ethics guidelines, and examines the ethical implications arising from the limitations of these models. We introduce a novel conceptual paradigm for aligning the ethical values of big models and discuss promising research directions for alignment criteria, evaluation, and method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T16:45:40Z)
• Achieving a Data-driven Risk Assessment Methodology for Ethical AI [3.523208537466128]
  We show that a multidisciplinary research approach is the foundation of a pragmatic definition of ethical and societal risks faced by organizations using AI. We propose a novel data-driven risk assessment methodology, entitled DRESS-eAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T12:55:33Z)
• On the Current and Emerging Challenges of Developing Fair and Ethical AI Solutions in Financial Services [1.911678487931003]
  We show how practical considerations reveal the gaps between high-level principles and concrete, deployed AI applications. We show how practical considerations reveal the gaps between high-level principles and concrete, deployed AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T00:15:04Z)
• Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices [44.67324097900778]
  Many current AI systems were found vulnerable to imperceptible attacks, biased against underrepresented groups, lacking in user privacy protection, etc. In this review, we strive to provide AI practitioners a comprehensive guide towards building trustworthy AI systems. To unify the current fragmented approaches towards trustworthy AI, we propose a systematic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T03:20:39Z)
• Beyond Fairness Metrics: Roadblocks and Challenges for Ethical AI in Practice [2.1485350418225244]
  We review practical challenges in building and deploying ethical AI at the scale of contemporary industrial and societal uses. We argue that a holistic consideration of ethics in the development and deployment of AI systems is necessary for building ethical AI in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-11T18:33:17Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.