Developing and Deploying Industry Standards for Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED): Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14689v2
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 04:21:13 GMT
- Title: Developing and Deploying Industry Standards for Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED): Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions
- Authors: Richard Tong, Haoyang Li, Joleen Liang, Qingsong Wen,
- Abstract summary: The adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) holds the promise of revolutionizing educational practices.
The lack of standardized practices in the development and deployment of AIED solutions has led to fragmented ecosystems.
This article aims to address the critical need to develop and implement industry standards in AIED.
- Score: 22.65961106637345
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) holds the promise of revolutionizing educational practices by offering personalized learning experiences, automating administrative and pedagogical tasks, and reducing the cost of content creation. However, the lack of standardized practices in the development and deployment of AIED solutions has led to fragmented ecosystems, which presents challenges in interoperability, scalability, and ethical governance. This article aims to address the critical need to develop and implement industry standards in AIED, offering a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape, challenges, and strategic approaches to overcome these obstacles. We begin by examining the various applications of AIED in various educational settings and identify key areas lacking in standardization, including system interoperability, ontology mapping, data integration, evaluation, and ethical governance. Then, we propose a multi-tiered framework for establishing robust industry standards for AIED. In addition, we discuss methodologies for the iterative development and deployment of standards, incorporating feedback loops from real-world applications to refine and adapt standards over time. The paper also highlights the role of emerging technologies and pedagogical theories in shaping future standards for AIED. Finally, we outline a strategic roadmap for stakeholders to implement these standards, fostering a cohesive and ethical AIED ecosystem. By establishing comprehensive industry standards, such as those by IEEE Artificial Intelligence Standards Committee (AISC) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO), we can accelerate and scale AIED solutions to improve educational outcomes, ensuring that technological advances align with the principles of inclusivity, fairness, and educational excellence.
Related papers
- POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems [3.02243271391691]
There is a significant gap between high-level AI ethics principles and low-level concrete practices for AI professionals.
We develop a novel holistic framework for Trustworthy AI - designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
Our goal is to empower AI professionals to confidently navigate the ethical dimensions of Trustworthy AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T01:05:16Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI [64.59151650272477]
We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors.
This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-04T17:44:58Z) - Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Models [46.560886177083084]
This paper provides an overview of the risks and challenges associated with big models, surveys existing AI ethics guidelines, and examines the ethical implications arising from the limitations of these models.
We introduce a novel conceptual paradigm for aligning the ethical values of big models and discuss promising research directions for alignment criteria, evaluation, and method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T16:45:40Z) - The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the
Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation.
We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z) - Towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in the Internet of Things
(IoT): Opportunities and Challenges [55.82853124625841]
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) possesses the capacity to comprehend, learn, and execute tasks with human cognitive abilities.
This research embarks on an exploration of the opportunities and challenges towards achieving AGI in the context of the Internet of Things.
The application spectrum for AGI-infused IoT is broad, encompassing domains ranging from smart grids, residential environments, manufacturing, and transportation to environmental monitoring, agriculture, healthcare, and education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T05:43:36Z) - Towards Implementing Responsible AI [22.514717870367623]
We propose four aspects of AI system design and development, adapting processes used in software engineering.
The salient findings cover four aspects of AI system design and development, adapting processes used in software engineering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-09T14:59:23Z) - Achieving a Data-driven Risk Assessment Methodology for Ethical AI [3.523208537466128]
We show that a multidisciplinary research approach is the foundation of a pragmatic definition of ethical and societal risks faced by organizations using AI.
We propose a novel data-driven risk assessment methodology, entitled DRESS-eAI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-29T12:55:33Z) - On the Current and Emerging Challenges of Developing Fair and Ethical AI
Solutions in Financial Services [1.911678487931003]
We show how practical considerations reveal the gaps between high-level principles and concrete, deployed AI applications.
We show how practical considerations reveal the gaps between high-level principles and concrete, deployed AI applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-02T00:15:04Z) - Beyond Fairness Metrics: Roadblocks and Challenges for Ethical AI in
Practice [2.1485350418225244]
We review practical challenges in building and deploying ethical AI at the scale of contemporary industrial and societal uses.
We argue that a holistic consideration of ethics in the development and deployment of AI systems is necessary for building ethical AI in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-11T18:33:17Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.