Learning from Reasoning Failures via Synthetic Data Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14523v1
• Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 07:45:53 GMT
• Title: Learning from Reasoning Failures via Synthetic Data Generation
• Authors: Gabriela Ben Melech Stan, Estelle Aflalo, Avinash Madasu, Vasudev Lal, Phillip Howard,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new approach for synthetic data generation which is grounded in the analysis of an existing LMM's reasoning failures.<n>We generate a large multimodal instruction tuning dataset containing over 553k examples.<n>Our results show that models trained on our synthetic data can even exceed the performance of LMMs trained on an equivalent amount of additional real data.
• Score: 5.893928870271388
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Training models on synthetic data has emerged as an increasingly important strategy for improving the performance of generative AI. This approach is particularly helpful for large multimodal models (LMMs) due to the relative scarcity of high-quality paired image-text data compared to language-only data. While a variety of methods have been proposed for generating large multimodal datasets, they do not tailor the synthetic data to address specific deficiencies in the reasoning abilities of LMMs which will be trained with the generated dataset. In contrast, humans often learn in a more efficient manner by seeking out examples related to the types of reasoning where they have failed previously. Inspired by this observation, we propose a new approach for synthetic data generation which is grounded in the analysis of an existing LMM's reasoning failures. Our methodology leverages frontier models to automatically analyze errors produced by a weaker LMM and propose new examples which can be used to correct the reasoning failure via additional training, which are then further filtered to ensure high quality. We generate a large multimodal instruction tuning dataset containing over 553k examples using our approach and conduct extensive experiments demonstrating its utility for improving the performance of LMMs on multiple downstream tasks. Our results show that models trained on our synthetic data can even exceed the performance of LMMs trained on an equivalent amount of additional real data, demonstrating the high value of generating synthetic data targeted to specific reasoning failure modes in LMMs. We will make our dataset and code publicly available.

Related papers

• OptMATH: A Scalable Bidirectional Data Synthesis Framework for Optimization Modeling [9.617742955894247]
  Lack of high-quality optimization modeling datasets hampers large language models.<n>We propose a scalable framework for synthesizing a high-quality dataset, named OptMATH.<n>We demonstrate that models of various sizes trained on OptMATH achieve superior results on multiple modeling benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T12:38:37Z)
• Not All LLM-Generated Data Are Equal: Rethinking Data Weighting in Text Classification [7.357494019212501]
  We propose efficient weighted-loss approaches to align synthetic data with real-world distribution. We empirically assessed the effectiveness of our method on multiple text classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T20:53:49Z)
• Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration [90.41908331897639]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly benefited from training on diverse, high-quality task-specific data. We present a novel approach, ReverseGen, designed to automatically generate effective training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T06:43:28Z)
• On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models [34.00031258223175]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have accentuated the need for diverse, high-quality pre-training data. Synthetic data emerges as a viable solution to the challenges of data scarcity and inaccessibility. We study the downstream effects of synthetic data diversity during both the pre-training and fine-tuning stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T22:14:07Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• MLLM-DataEngine: An Iterative Refinement Approach for MLLM [62.30753425449056]
  We propose a novel closed-loop system that bridges data generation, model training, and evaluation. Within each loop, the MLLM-DataEngine first analyze the weakness of the model based on the evaluation results. For targeting, we propose an Adaptive Bad-case Sampling module, which adjusts the ratio of different types of data. For quality, we resort to GPT-4 to generate high-quality data with each given data type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T01:41:04Z)
• Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.29595679428105]
  We investigate how the pre-training loss, supervised data amount, and augmented data amount influence the reasoning performances of a supervised LLM. We find that rejection samples from multiple models push LLaMA-7B to an accuracy of 49.3% on GSM8K which outperforms the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) accuracy of 35.9% significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T15:34:01Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.