How Effective are Generative Large Language Models in Performing Requirements Classification?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16768v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:41:11 GMT
• Title: How Effective are Generative Large Language Models in Performing Requirements Classification?
• Authors: Waad Alhoshan, Alessio Ferrari, Liping Zhao,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the effectiveness of three generative large language models (LLMs) performing both binary and multi-class requirements classification.<n>Our study concludes that while factors like prompt design and LLM architecture are universally important, others-such as dataset variations-have a more situational impact, depending on the complexity of the classification task.
• Score: 4.429729688079712
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, transformer-based large language models (LLMs) have revolutionised natural language processing (NLP), with generative models opening new possibilities for tasks that require context-aware text generation. Requirements engineering (RE) has also seen a surge in the experimentation of LLMs for different tasks, including trace-link detection, regulatory compliance, and others. Requirements classification is a common task in RE. While non-generative LLMs like BERT have been successfully applied to this task, there has been limited exploration of generative LLMs. This gap raises an important question: how well can generative LLMs, which produce context-aware outputs, perform in requirements classification? In this study, we explore the effectiveness of three generative LLMs-Bloom, Gemma, and Llama-in performing both binary and multi-class requirements classification. We design an extensive experimental study involving over 400 experiments across three widely used datasets (PROMISE NFR, Functional-Quality, and SecReq). Our study concludes that while factors like prompt design and LLM architecture are universally important, others-such as dataset variations-have a more situational impact, depending on the complexity of the classification task. This insight can guide future model development and deployment strategies, focusing on optimising prompt structures and aligning model architectures with task-specific needs for improved performance.

Related papers

• Catastrophic Forgetting in LLMs: A Comparative Analysis Across Language Tasks [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP)<n>This study evaluates the continual fine-tuning of various open-source LLMs on key NLU tasks.<n>Our results indicate that models such as Phi-3.5-mini exhibit minimal forgetting while maintaining strong learning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T23:06:55Z)
• Adaptive Pruning for Large Language Models with Structural Importance Awareness [66.2690963378878]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved language understanding and generation capabilities. LLMs are difficult to deploy on resource-constrained edge devices due to their high computational and storage resource demands. We propose structurally-aware adaptive pruning (SAAP) to significantly reduce the computational and memory costs while maintaining model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T18:08:04Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks [22.66167973623777]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed NLP with their remarkable In-context Learning (ICL) capabilities. This paper investigates whether LLMs can generalize from labeled examples of predefined tasks to novel tasks. We show that cross-task prompting leads to a remarkable performance boost of 107% for LLaMA-2 7B, 18.6% for LLaMA-2 13B, and 3.2% for GPT 3.5 on average over zero-shot prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T05:20:49Z)
• LLM Augmented LLMs: Expanding Capabilities through Composition [56.40953749310957]
  CALM -- Composition to Augment Language Models -- introduces cross-attention between models to compose their representations and enable new capabilities. We illustrate that augmenting PaLM2-S with a smaller model trained on low-resource languages results in an absolute improvement of up to 13% on tasks like translation into English. When PaLM2-S is augmented with a code-specific model, we see a relative improvement of 40% over the base model for code generation and explanation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T18:53:01Z)
• Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models [11.845239346943067]
  parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is a promising approach to efficiently specialize large language models (LLMs) to task-specific data. Our study highlights the potential for tuning larger LLMs and significant reductions in memory usage by combining PEFT with quantization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T04:31:06Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models for Counterfactual Generation: An Empirical Study [13.506528217009507]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress in a wide range of natural language understanding and generation tasks. We present a comprehensive evaluation framework on various types of NLU tasks, which covers all key factors in determining LLMs' capability of generating counterfactuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:44:32Z)
• LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models [65.02607075556742]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation. We tackle the compression of LLMs within the bound of two constraints: being task-agnostic and minimizing the reliance on the original training dataset. Our method, named LLM-Pruner, adopts structural pruning that selectively removes non-critical coupled structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T12:10:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.