Evaluating Uncertainty in Deep Gaussian Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17719v1
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:31:55 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Uncertainty in Deep Gaussian Processes
• Authors: Matthijs van der Lende, Jeremias Lino Ferrao, Niclas Müller-Hof,
• Abstract summary: Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) and Deep Sigma Point Processes (DSPPs) extend GPs hierarchically, offering promising methods for uncertainty grounded in Bayesian principles.<n>This work evaluates these models on regression (CASP dataset) and classification (ESR dataset) tasks, assessing predictive performance (MAE, Accu- racy), calibration using Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) and Error (ECE)<n>Compared to Deep Ensembles, which demonstrated superior robustness in both per-formance and calibration under the tested shifts, the GP-based methods showed vulnerabilities, exhibiting particular sensitivity in the observed metrics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reliable uncertainty estimates are crucial in modern machine learning. Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) and Deep Sigma Point Processes (DSPPs) extend GPs hierarchically, offering promising methods for uncertainty quantification grounded in Bayesian principles. However, their empirical calibration and robustness under distribution shift relative to baselines like Deep Ensembles remain understudied. This work evaluates these models on regression (CASP dataset) and classification (ESR dataset) tasks, assessing predictive performance (MAE, Accu- racy), calibration using Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) and Expected Calibration Error (ECE), alongside robustness under various synthetic feature-level distribution shifts. Results indicate DSPPs provide strong in-distribution calibration leveraging their sigma point approximations. However, compared to Deep Ensembles, which demonstrated superior robustness in both per- formance and calibration under the tested shifts, the GP-based methods showed vulnerabilities, exhibiting particular sensitivity in the observed metrics. Our findings underscore ensembles as a robust baseline, suggesting that while deep GP methods offer good in-distribution calibration, their practical robustness under distribution shift requires careful evaluation. To facilitate reproducibility, we make our code available at https://github.com/matthjs/xai-gp.

Related papers

• On the Convergence of DP-SGD with Adaptive Clipping [56.24689348875711]
  Gradient Descent with gradient clipping is a powerful technique for enabling differentially private optimization.<n>This paper provides the first comprehensive convergence analysis of SGD with quantile clipping (QC-SGD)<n>We show how QC-SGD suffers from a bias problem similar to constant-threshold clipped SGD but can be mitigated through a carefully designed quantile and step size schedule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-27T20:29:47Z)
• Alpha-VI DeepONet: A prior-robust variational Bayesian approach for enhancing DeepONets with uncertainty quantification [0.0]
  We introduce a novel deep operator network (DeepONet) framework that incorporates generalised variational inference (GVI) By incorporating Bayesian neural networks as the building blocks for the branch and trunk networks, our framework endows DeepONet with uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate that modifying the variational objective function yields superior results in terms of minimising the mean squared error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T16:22:03Z)
• Towards Robust and Interpretable EMG-based Hand Gesture Recognition using Deep Metric Meta Learning [37.21211404608413]
  We propose a shift to deep metric-based meta-learning in EMG PR to supervise the creation of meaningful and interpretable representations. We derive a robust class proximity-based confidence estimator that leads to a better rejection of incorrect decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T23:37:50Z)
• Deep Discriminative to Kernel Density Graph for In- and Out-of-distribution Calibrated Inference [7.840433908659846]
  Deep discriminative approaches like random forests and deep neural networks have recently found applications in many important real-world scenarios. However, deploying these learning algorithms in safety-critical applications raises concerns, particularly when it comes to ensuring confidence calibration for both in-distribution and out-of-distribution data points. In this paper, we address ID and OOD calibration problems jointly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T05:07:16Z)
• Self-Certifying Classification by Linearized Deep Assignment [65.0100925582087]
  We propose a novel class of deep predictors for classifying metric data on graphs within PAC-Bayes risk certification paradigm. Building on the recent PAC-Bayes literature and data-dependent priors, this approach enables learning posterior distributions on the hypothesis space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T19:59:14Z)
• On the Practicality of Deterministic Epistemic Uncertainty [106.06571981780591]
  deterministic uncertainty methods (DUMs) achieve strong performance on detecting out-of-distribution data. It remains unclear whether DUMs are well calibrated and can seamlessly scale to real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T17:59:07Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Gaussian Processes [22.403365399119107]
  Gaussian processes (GPs) enable principled computation of model uncertainty, making them attractive for safety-critical applications. We present a framework to analyse adversarial robustness of GPs, defined as invariance of the model's decision to bounded perturbations. We develop a branch-and-bound scheme to refine the bounds and show, for any $epsilon > 0$, that our algorithm is guaranteed to converge to values $epsilon$-close to the actual values in finitely many iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T15:14:56Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shift [81.74795324629712]
  We call prediction-time batch normalization, which significantly improves model accuracy and calibration under covariate shift. We show that prediction-time batch normalization provides complementary benefits to existing state-of-the-art approaches for improving robustness. The method has mixed results when used alongside pre-training, and does not seem to perform as well under more natural types of dataset shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T05:08:43Z)
• Deep Sigma Point Processes [22.5396672566053]
  We introduce a class of parametric models inspired by the compositional structure of Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) Deep Sigma Point Processes (DSPPs) retain many of the attractive features of (variational) DGPs, including mini-batch training and predictive uncertainty that is controlled by kernel basis functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T03:40:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.