A Cryptographic Perspective on Mitigation vs. Detection in Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20310v1
• Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:46:45 GMT
• Title: A Cryptographic Perspective on Mitigation vs. Detection in Machine Learning
• Authors: Greg Gluch, Shafi Goldwasser,
• Abstract summary: We define defense by detection (DbD) and defense by mitigation (DbM)<n>We show that achieving DbD and achieving DbM are equivalent for ML classification tasks.<n>We show a separation between DbD and DbM by exhibiting a generative learning task for which is possible to defend by mitigation but is provably impossible to defend by detection.
• Score: 2.8437395946408124
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we initiate a cryptographically inspired theoretical study of detection versus mitigation of adversarial inputs produced by attackers of Machine Learning algorithms during inference time. We formally define defense by detection (DbD) and defense by mitigation (DbM). Our definitions come in the form of a 3-round protocol between two resource-bounded parties: a trainer/defender and an attacker. The attacker aims to produce inference-time inputs that fool the training algorithm. We define correctness, completeness, and soundness properties to capture successful defense at inference time while not degrading (too much) the performance of the algorithm on inputs from the training distribution. We first show that achieving DbD and achieving DbM are equivalent for ML classification tasks. Surprisingly, this is not the case for ML generative learning tasks, where there are many possible correct outputs that can be generated for each input. We show a separation between DbD and DbM by exhibiting a generative learning task for which is possible to defend by mitigation but is provably impossible to defend by detection under the assumption that the Identity-Based Fully Homomorphic Encryption (IB-FHE), publicly-verifiable zero-knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge (zk-SNARK) and Strongly Unforgeable Signatures exist. The mitigation phase uses significantly fewer samples than the initial training algorithm.

Related papers

• Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimal [70.28430200655919]
  We show that finetuning LLMs with verifier-based (VB) methods based on RL or search is far superior to verifier-free (VF) approaches based on distilling or cloning search traces, given a fixed amount of compute/data budget.<n>We corroborate our theory empirically on both didactic and math reasoning problems with 3/8B-sized pre-trained LLMs, where we find verification is crucial for scaling test-time compute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:43:24Z)
• Simple and Provable Scaling Laws for the Test-Time Compute of Large Language Models [70.07661254213181]
  We propose two algorithms that enjoy provable scaling laws for the test-time compute of large language models.<n>One is a two-stage knockout-style algorithm, where each candidate is evaluated by its average win rate against multiple opponents.<n>The other is a two-stage league-style algorithm, where each candidate is evaluated by its average win rate against multiple opponents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T05:29:47Z)
• Improving Adversarial Robustness via Decoupled Visual Representation Masking [65.73203518658224]
  In this paper, we highlight two novel properties of robust features from the feature distribution perspective. We find that state-of-the-art defense methods aim to address both of these mentioned issues well. Specifically, we propose a simple but effective defense based on decoupled visual representation masking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T13:29:41Z)
• Adversarial Machine Unlearning [26.809123658470693]
  This paper focuses on the challenge of machine unlearning, aiming to remove the influence of specific training data on machine learning models. Traditionally, the development of unlearning algorithms runs parallel with that of membership inference attacks (MIA), a type of privacy threat. We propose a game-theoretic framework that integrates MIAs into the design of unlearning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T20:07:22Z)
• Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attacks [99.5882845458567]
  Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can bypass their safety guardrails. We propose a fast adversarial training algorithm (C-AdvUL) composed of two losses. C-AdvIPO is an adversarial variant of IPO that does not require utility data for adversarially robust alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T14:20:09Z)
• Towards Robust Domain Generation Algorithm Classification [1.4542411354617986]
  We implement 32 white-box attacks, 19 of which are very effective and induce a false-negative rate (FNR) of $approx$ 100% on unhardened classifiers. We propose a novel training scheme that leverages adversarial latent space vectors and discretized adversarial domains to significantly improve robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T11:56:29Z)
• Token-Level Adversarial Prompt Detection Based on Perplexity Measures and Contextual Information [67.78183175605761]
  Large Language Models are susceptible to adversarial prompt attacks. This vulnerability underscores a significant concern regarding the robustness and reliability of LLMs. We introduce a novel approach to detecting adversarial prompts at a token level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T03:17:21Z)
• Enhancing Adversarial Robustness in Low-Label Regime via Adaptively Weighted Regularization and Knowledge Distillation [1.675857332621569]
  We investigate semi-supervised adversarial training where labeled data is scarce. We develop a semi-supervised adversarial training algorithm that combines the proposed regularization term with knowledge distillation. Our proposed algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance with significant margins compared to existing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T05:48:38Z)
• Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks [9.79503506460041]
  Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks (AA) For an image recognition task, this means that a small perturbation of the original can result in the image being misclassified. We re-cast the problem using techniques of Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization (DRO) and obtain novel contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T13:41:24Z)
• Detection and Mitigation of Byzantine Attacks in Distributed Training [24.951227624475443]
  An abnormal Byzantine behavior of the worker nodes can derail the training and compromise the quality of the inference. Recent work considers a wide range of attack models and has explored robust aggregation and/or computational redundancy to correct the distorted gradients. In this work, we consider attack models ranging from strong ones: $q$ omniscient adversaries with full knowledge of the defense protocol that can change from iteration to iteration to weak ones: $q$ randomly chosen adversaries with limited collusion abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T05:49:52Z)
• Fast and Scalable Adversarial Training of Kernel SVM via Doubly Stochastic Gradients [34.98827928892501]
  Adversarial attacks by generating examples which are almost indistinguishable from natural examples, pose a serious threat to learning models. Support vector machine (SVM) is a classical yet still important learning algorithm even in the current deep learning era. We propose adv-SVM to improve its adversarial robustness via adversarial training, which has been demonstrated to be the most promising defense techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-21T08:15:32Z)
• Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Training [58.38336773082818]
  We investigate the memorization effect in adversarial training (AT) for promoting a deeper understanding of capacity, convergence, generalization, and especially robust overfitting. We propose a new mitigation algorithm motivated by detailed memorization analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T05:39:57Z)
• ExAD: An Ensemble Approach for Explanation-based Adversarial Detection [17.455233006559734]
  We propose ExAD, a framework to detect adversarial examples using an ensemble of explanation techniques. We evaluate our approach using six state-of-the-art adversarial attacks on three image datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T00:53:07Z)
• Anomaly Detection-Based Unknown Face Presentation Attack Detection [74.4918294453537]
  Anomaly detection-based spoof attack detection is a recent development in face Presentation Attack Detection. In this paper, we present a deep-learning solution for anomaly detection-based spoof attack detection. The proposed approach benefits from the representation learning power of the CNNs and learns better features for fPAD task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T21:20:55Z)
• An Information Bottleneck Approach for Controlling Conciseness in Rationale Extraction [84.49035467829819]
  We show that it is possible to better manage this trade-off by optimizing a bound on the Information Bottleneck (IB) objective. Our fully unsupervised approach jointly learns an explainer that predicts sparse binary masks over sentences, and an end-task predictor that considers only the extracted rationale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T23:26:41Z)
• On Adversarial Examples and Stealth Attacks in Artificial Intelligence Systems [62.997667081978825]
  We present a formal framework for assessing and analyzing two classes of malevolent action towards generic Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. The first class involves adversarial examples and concerns the introduction of small perturbations of the input data that cause misclassification. The second class, introduced here for the first time and named stealth attacks, involves small perturbations to the AI system itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-09T10:56:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.