Token-Efficient Prompt Injection Attack: Provoking Cessation in LLM Reasoning via Adaptive Token Compression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20493v1
• Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:34:22 GMT
• Title: Token-Efficient Prompt Injection Attack: Provoking Cessation in LLM Reasoning via Adaptive Token Compression
• Authors: Yu Cui, Yujun Cai, Yiwei Wang,
• Abstract summary: "Reasoning Interruption Attack" is a prompt injection attack based on adaptive token compression.<n>We develop a systematic approach to efficiently collect attack prompts and an adaptive token compression framework.<n> Experiments show our compression framework significantly reduces prompt length while maintaining effective attack capabilities.
• Score: 12.215295420714787
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While reasoning large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable performance across various tasks, they also contain notable security vulnerabilities. Recent research has uncovered a "thinking-stopped" vulnerability in DeepSeek-R1, where model-generated reasoning tokens can forcibly interrupt the inference process, resulting in empty responses that compromise LLM-integrated applications. However, existing methods triggering this vulnerability require complex mathematical word problems with long prompts--even exceeding 5,000 tokens. To reduce the token cost and formally define this vulnerability, we propose a novel prompt injection attack named "Reasoning Interruption Attack", based on adaptive token compression. We demonstrate that simple standalone arithmetic tasks can effectively trigger this vulnerability, and the prompts based on such tasks exhibit simpler logical structures than mathematical word problems. We develop a systematic approach to efficiently collect attack prompts and an adaptive token compression framework that utilizes LLMs to automatically compress these prompts. Experiments show our compression framework significantly reduces prompt length while maintaining effective attack capabilities. We further investigate the attack's performance via output prefix and analyze the underlying causes of the vulnerability, providing valuable insights for improving security in reasoning LLMs.

Related papers

• CachePrune: Neural-Based Attribution Defense Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks [47.62236306990252]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to indirect prompt injection attacks. This vulnerability stems from LLMs' inability to distinguish between data and instructions within a prompt. We propose CachePrune that defends against this attack by identifying and pruning task-triggering neurons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T23:42:21Z)
• Efficient but Vulnerable: Benchmarking and Defending LLM Batch Prompting Attack [7.302295561638202]
  Malicious users can inject attack instructions into a batch, leading to unwanted interference across all queries.<n>This vulnerability can result in the inclusion of harmful content, such as phishing links, or the disruption of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T15:16:10Z)
• Layer-Level Self-Exposure and Patch: Affirmative Token Mitigation for Jailbreak Attack Defense [55.77152277982117]
  We introduce Layer-AdvPatcher, a methodology designed to defend against jailbreak attacks.<n>We use an unlearning strategy to patch specific layers within large language models through self-augmented datasets.<n>Our framework reduces the harmfulness and attack success rate of jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T19:06:03Z)
• PROMPTFUZZ: Harnessing Fuzzing Techniques for Robust Testing of Prompt Injection in LLMs [2.4117856871959953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread use in various applications due to their powerful capability to generate human-like text.<n> prompt injection attacks involve overwriting a model's original instructions with malicious prompts to manipulate the generated text.<n>We propose PROMPTFUZZ, a novel testing framework that leverages fuzzing techniques to assess the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T06:08:32Z)
• Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context [49.13497493053742]
  This research explores converting a nonsensical suffix attack into a sensible prompt via a situation-driven contextual re-writing. We combine an independent, meaningful adversarial insertion and situations derived from movies to check if this can trick an LLM. Our approach demonstrates that a successful situation-driven attack can be executed on both open-source and proprietary LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T19:47:26Z)
• AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting [54.931241667414184]
  We propose textbfAdaptive textbfShield Prompting, which prepends inputs with defense prompts to defend MLLMs against structure-based jailbreak attacks. Our methods can consistently improve MLLMs' robustness against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:57:13Z)
• Signed-Prompt: A New Approach to Prevent Prompt Injection Attacks Against LLM-Integrated Applications [0.0]
  This paper introduces the 'Signed-Prompt' method as a novel solution for prompt injection attacks. The study involves signing sensitive instructions within command segments by authorized users, enabling the LLM to discern trusted instruction sources. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the Signed-Prompt method, showing substantial resistance to various types of prompt injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T11:44:18Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Token-Level Adversarial Prompt Detection Based on Perplexity Measures and Contextual Information [67.78183175605761]
  Large Language Models are susceptible to adversarial prompt attacks. This vulnerability underscores a significant concern regarding the robustness and reliability of LLMs. We introduce a novel approach to detecting adversarial prompts at a token level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T03:17:21Z)
• Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning [8.15194326639149]
  In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks. Existing attacks are either easy to detect, rely on external models, or lack specificity towards ICL. This work introduces a novel transferable attack against ICL to address these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T15:01:48Z)
• Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection [64.67495502772866]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into various applications. We show how attackers can override original instructions and employed controls using Prompt Injection attacks. We derive a comprehensive taxonomy from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T17:14:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.