Can Differentially Private Fine-tuning LLMs Protect Against Privacy Attacks?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21036v2
• Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 10:10:01 GMT
• Title: Can Differentially Private Fine-tuning LLMs Protect Against Privacy Attacks?
• Authors: Hao Du, Shang Liu, Yang Cao,
• Abstract summary: Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) has become an essential strategy for adapting them to specialized tasks.<n>Although differential privacy (DP) offers strong theoretical guarantees against such leakage, its empirical privacy effectiveness on LLMs remains unclear.<n>This paper systematically investigates the impact of DP across fine-tuning methods and privacy budgets.
• Score: 8.189149471520542
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) has become an essential strategy for adapting them to specialized tasks; however, this process introduces significant privacy challenges, as sensitive training data may be inadvertently memorized and exposed. Although differential privacy (DP) offers strong theoretical guarantees against such leakage, its empirical privacy effectiveness on LLMs remains unclear, especially under different fine-tuning methods. In this paper, we systematically investigate the impact of DP across fine-tuning methods and privacy budgets, using both data extraction and membership inference attacks to assess empirical privacy risks. Our main findings are as follows: (1) Differential privacy reduces model utility, but its impact varies significantly across different fine-tuning methods. (2) Without DP, the privacy risks of models fine-tuned with different approaches differ considerably. (3) When DP is applied, even a relatively high privacy budget can substantially lower privacy risk. (4) The privacy-utility trade-off under DP training differs greatly among fine-tuning methods, with some methods being unsuitable for DP due to severe utility degradation. Our results provide practical guidance for privacy-conscious deployment of LLMs and pave the way for future research on optimizing the privacy-utility trade-off in fine-tuning methodologies.

Related papers

• Revisiting Privacy, Utility, and Efficiency Trade-offs when Fine-Tuning Large Language Models [12.635018411121413]
  We study the inherent trade-offs in minimizing privacy risks and maximizing utility, while maintaining high computational efficiency.<n>We find that efficient fine-tuning methods like LoRA mitigate privacy risks similar to private fine-tuning methods like DP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T22:16:03Z)
• Privacy in Fine-tuning Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directions [11.338466798715906]
  Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance across various domains. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of privacy challenges associated with fine-tuning LLMs. We highlight vulnerabilities to various privacy attacks, including membership inference, data extraction, and backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T06:41:29Z)
• Differentially Private Random Feature Model [52.468511541184895]
  We produce a differentially private random feature model for privacy-preserving kernel machines. We show that our method preserves privacy and derive a generalization error bound for the method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T05:31:08Z)
• Efficient and Private: Memorisation under differentially private parameter-efficient fine-tuning in language models [2.3281513013731145]
  Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for specific tasks introduces privacy risks, as models may inadvertently memorise and leak sensitive training data. Differential Privacy (DP) offers a solution to mitigate these risks, but introduces significant computational and performance trade-offs. We show that PEFT methods achieve comparable performance to standard fine-tuning while requiring fewer parameters and significantly reducing privacy leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T13:17:36Z)
• Activity Recognition on Avatar-Anonymized Datasets with Masked Differential Privacy [64.32494202656801]
  Privacy-preserving computer vision is an important emerging problem in machine learning and artificial intelligence.<n>We present anonymization pipeline that replaces sensitive human subjects in video datasets with synthetic avatars within context.<n>We also proposeMaskDP to protect non-anonymized but privacy sensitive background information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:22:53Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• Differentially Private Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models [22.454127503937883]
  The integration of Differential Privacy with diffusion models (DMs) presents a promising yet challenging frontier. Recent developments in this field have highlighted the potential for generating high-quality synthetic data by pre-training on public data. We propose a strategy optimized for private diffusion models, which minimizes the number of trainable parameters to enhance the privacy-utility trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T14:18:04Z)
• Provable Privacy with Non-Private Pre-Processing [56.770023668379615]
  We propose a general framework to evaluate the additional privacy cost incurred by non-private data-dependent pre-processing algorithms. Our framework establishes upper bounds on the overall privacy guarantees by utilising two new technical notions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T17:54:49Z)
• Private Fine-tuning of Large Language Models with Zeroth-order Optimization [51.19403058739522]
  Differentially private gradient descent (DP-SGD) allows models to be trained in a privacy-preserving manner.<n>We introduce DP-ZO, a private fine-tuning framework for large language models by privatizing zeroth order optimization methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T03:53:59Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Gradient Masking and the Underestimated Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy in Deep Learning [0.0]
  This paper experimentally evaluates the impact of training with Differential Privacy (DP) on model vulnerability against a broad range of adversarial attacks. The results suggest that private models are less robust than their non-private counterparts, and that adversarial examples transfer better among DP models than between non-private and private ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T16:10:54Z)
• Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret Guarantees [69.4202374491817]
  We design privacy preserving exploration policies for episodic reinforcement learning (RL) We first provide a meaningful privacy formulation using the notion of joint differential privacy (JDP) We then develop a private optimism-based learning algorithm that simultaneously achieves strong PAC and regret bounds, and enjoys a JDP guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T20:18:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.