Differentially Private Random Feature Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04785v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 05:31:08 GMT
• Title: Differentially Private Random Feature Model
• Authors: Chunyang Liao, Deanna Needell, Alexander Xue,
• Abstract summary: We produce a differentially private random feature model for privacy-preserving kernel machines. We show that our method preserves privacy and derive a generalization error bound for the method.
• Score: 52.468511541184895
• License:
• Abstract: Designing privacy-preserving machine learning algorithms has received great attention in recent years, especially in the setting when the data contains sensitive information. Differential privacy (DP) is a widely used mechanism for data analysis with privacy guarantees. In this paper, we produce a differentially private random feature model. Random features, which were proposed to approximate large-scale kernel machines, have been used to study privacy-preserving kernel machines as well. We consider the over-parametrized regime (more features than samples) where the non-private random feature model is learned via solving the min-norm interpolation problem, and then we apply output perturbation techniques to produce a private model. We show that our method preserves privacy and derive a generalization error bound for the method. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to consider privacy-preserving random feature models in the over-parametrized regime and provide theoretical guarantees. We empirically compare our method with other privacy-preserving learning methods in the literature as well. Our results show that our approach is superior to the other methods in terms of generalization performance on synthetic data and benchmark data sets. Additionally, it was recently observed that DP mechanisms may exhibit and exacerbate disparate impact, which means that the outcomes of DP learning algorithms vary significantly among different groups. We show that both theoretically and empirically, random features have the potential to reduce disparate impact, and hence achieve better fairness.

Related papers

• Pseudo-Probability Unlearning: Towards Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Machine Unlearning [59.29849532966454]
  We propose PseudoProbability Unlearning (PPU), a novel method that enables models to forget data to adhere to privacy-preserving manner. Our method achieves over 20% improvements in forgetting error compared to the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:27:06Z)
• CorBin-FL: A Differentially Private Federated Learning Mechanism using Common Randomness [6.881974834597426]
  Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising framework for distributed machine learning. We introduce CorBin-FL, a privacy mechanism that uses correlated binary quantization to achieve differential privacy. We also propose AugCorBin-FL, an extension that, in addition to PLDP, user-level and sample-level central differential privacy guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T00:23:44Z)
• Enforcing Privacy in Distributed Learning with Performance Guarantees [57.14673504239551]
  We study the privatization of distributed learning and optimization strategies. We show that the popular additive random perturbation scheme degrades performance because it is not well-tuned to the graph structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T13:03:27Z)
• Privacy Induces Robustness: Information-Computation Gaps and Sparse Mean Estimation [8.9598796481325]
  We investigate the consequences of this observation for both algorithms and computational complexity across different statistical problems. We establish an information-computation gap for private sparse mean estimation. We also give evidence for privacy-induced information-computation gaps for several other statistics and learning problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T20:03:41Z)
• Differentially private multivariate medians [4.588028371034407]
  We develop novel finite-sample performance guarantees for differentially private depth-based medians. We show that under Cauchy marginals, the cost of heavy-tailed location estimation outweighs the cost of privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T17:56:04Z)
• Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent with Low-Noise [49.981789906200035]
  Modern machine learning algorithms aim to extract fine-grained information from data to provide accurate predictions, which often conflicts with the goal of privacy protection. This paper addresses the practical and theoretical importance of developing privacy-preserving machine learning algorithms that ensure good performance while preserving privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-09T08:54:13Z)
• Individual Privacy Accounting for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent [69.14164921515949]
  We characterize privacy guarantees for individual examples when releasing models trained by DP-SGD. We find that most examples enjoy stronger privacy guarantees than the worst-case bound. This implies groups that are underserved in terms of model utility simultaneously experience weaker privacy guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T13:49:37Z)
• PEARL: Data Synthesis via Private Embeddings and Adversarial Reconstruction Learning [1.8692254863855962]
  We propose a new framework of data using deep generative models in a differentially private manner. Within our framework, sensitive data are sanitized with rigorous privacy guarantees in a one-shot fashion. Our proposal has theoretical guarantees of performance, and empirical evaluations on multiple datasets show that our approach outperforms other methods at reasonable levels of privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T18:00:01Z)
• Differentially Private Federated Learning with Laplacian Smoothing [72.85272874099644]
  Federated learning aims to protect data privacy by collaboratively learning a model without sharing private data among users. An adversary may still be able to infer the private training data by attacking the released model. Differential privacy provides a statistical protection against such attacks at the price of significantly degrading the accuracy or utility of the trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T04:28:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.