The Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF): A Unified Approach for Evaluating Software Architectures, Reference Architectures, and Architectural Frameworks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00688v1
• Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 17:48:52 GMT
• Title: The Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF): A Unified Approach for Evaluating Software Architectures, Reference Architectures, and Architectural Frameworks
• Authors: Amine Ben Hassouna,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF)<n>ATRAF is a scenario-driven framework for evaluating tradeoffs and risks across architectural levels.<n>It enables the identification of sensitivities, tradeoffs, and risks while supporting continuous refinement of architectural artifacts.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern software systems are guided by hierarchical architectural concepts -- software architectures, reference architectures, and architectural frameworks -- each operating at a distinct level of abstraction. These artifacts promote reuse, scalability, and consistency, but also embed tradeoffs that shape critical quality attributes such as modifiability, performance, and security. Existing evaluation methods, such as the Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM), focus on system-specific architectures and are not designed to address the broader generality and variability of higher-level architectural forms. To close this gap, we introduce the Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF) -- a unified, scenario-driven framework for evaluating tradeoffs and risks across architectural levels. ATRAF encompasses three methods: the Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Method (ATRAM), extending ATAM with enhanced risk identification for concrete systems; the Reference Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Method (RATRAM), adapting ATRAM to the evaluation of domain-level reference architectures; and the Architectural Framework Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Method (AFTRAM), supporting the evaluation of architectural frameworks that guide entire system families. All three methods follow an iterative spiral process that enables the identification of sensitivities, tradeoffs, and risks while supporting continuous refinement of architectural artifacts. We demonstrate ATRAF through progressively abstracted examples derived from the Remote Temperature Sensor (RTS) case, originally introduced in the ATAM literature. ATRAF equips architects, reference modelers, and framework designers with a practical, systematic approach for analyzing design alternatives and managing quality attribute tradeoffs early in the lifecycle and across all levels of architectural abstraction.

Related papers

• From Requirements to Architecture: Semi-Automatically Generating Software Architectures [0.0]
  This method involves the architect's close collaboration with LLM-fueled tooling over the whole process.<n>The architect is guided through Domain Model creation, Use Case specification, architectural decisions, and architecture evaluation.<n>Preliminary results suggest the feasibility of this process and indicate major time savings for the architect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T15:46:56Z)
• Semi-Automated Design of Data-Intensive Architectures [49.1574468325115]
  This paper introduces a development methodology for data-intensive architectures.<n>It guides architects in (i) designing a suitable architecture for their specific application scenario, and (ii) selecting an appropriate set of concrete systems to implement the application.<n>We show that the description languages we adopt can capture the key aspects of data-intensive architectures proposed by researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T16:01:11Z)
• A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval [64.75808744228067]
  We focus on two key aspects: backbone models for feature extraction and end-to-end system architectures for relevance estimation.<n>We trace the development from traditional term-based methods to modern neural approaches, particularly highlighting the impact of transformer-based models and subsequent large language models (LLMs)<n>We conclude by discussing emerging challenges and future directions, including architectural optimizations for performance and scalability, handling of multimodal, multilingual data, and adaptation to novel application domains beyond traditional search paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:42:58Z)
• A quantitative framework for evaluating architectural patterns in ML systems [49.1574468325115]
  This study proposes a framework for quantitative assessment of architectural patterns in ML systems. We focus on scalability and performance metrics for cost-effective CPU-based inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T15:30:09Z)
• EM-DARTS: Hierarchical Differentiable Architecture Search for Eye Movement Recognition [20.209756662832365]
  Differentiable Neural Architecture Search (DARTS) automates the manual process of architecture design with high search efficiency.<n>We propose EM-DARTS, a hierarchical differentiable architecture search algorithm to automatically design the DL architecture for eye movement recognition.<n>We show that EM-DARTS is capable of producing an optimal architecture that leads to state-of-the-art recognition performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T13:11:08Z)
• Unsupervised Graph Neural Architecture Search with Disentangled Self-supervision [51.88848982611515]
  Unsupervised graph neural architecture search remains unexplored in the literature. We propose a novel Disentangled Self-supervised Graph Neural Architecture Search model. Our model is able to achieve state-of-the-art performance against several baseline methods in an unsupervised manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T05:23:55Z)
• From Requirements to Architecture: An AI-Based Journey to Semi-Automatically Generate Software Architectures [2.4150871564195007]
  We propose a method to generate software architecture candidates based on requirements using artificial intelligence techniques. We further envision an automatic evaluation and trade-off analysis of the generated architecture candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T10:56:58Z)
• Software Architecture Recovery with Information Fusion [14.537490019685384]
  We propose SARIF, a fully automated architecture recovery technique. It incorporates three types of comprehensive information, including dependencies, code text and folder structure. SARIF is 36.1% more accurate than the best of the previous techniques on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T12:35:37Z)
• Serving Deep Learning Model in Relational Databases [70.53282490832189]
  Serving deep learning (DL) models on relational data has become a critical requirement across diverse commercial and scientific domains. We highlight three pivotal paradigms: The state-of-the-art DL-centric architecture offloads DL computations to dedicated DL frameworks. The potential UDF-centric architecture encapsulates one or more tensor computations into User Defined Functions (UDFs) within the relational database management system (RDBMS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T06:01:35Z)
• Enhancing Architecture Frameworks by Including Modern Stakeholders and their Views/Viewpoints [48.87872564630711]
  The stakeholders with data science and Machine Learning related concerns, such as data scientists and data engineers, are yet to be included in existing architecture frameworks.<n>We surveyed 61 subject matter experts from over 25 organizations in 10 countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T21:54:34Z)
• Architecting Safer Autonomous Aviation Systems [1.2599533416395767]
  This paper considers common architectural patterns used within traditional aviation systems and explores their safety and safety assurance implications. Considering safety as an architectural property, we discuss both the allocation of safety requirements and the architectural trade-offs involved early in the design lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T21:02:18Z)
• A Compositional Approach to Creating Architecture Frameworks with an Application to Distributed AI Systems [16.690434072032176]
  We show how compositional thinking can provide rules for the creation and management of architectural frameworks for complex systems. The aim of the paper is not to provide viewpoints or architecture models specific to AI systems, but instead to provide guidelines on how a consistent framework can be built up with existing, or newly created, viewpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-27T18:05:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.