Investigating Middle School Students Question-Asking and Answer-Evaluation Skills When Using ChatGPT for Science Investigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01106v1
• Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 08:38:17 GMT
• Title: Investigating Middle School Students Question-Asking and Answer-Evaluation Skills When Using ChatGPT for Science Investigation
• Authors: Rania Abdelghani, Kou Murayama, Celeste Kidd, Hélène Sauzéon, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,
• Abstract summary: Generative AI (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT allow users to explore and address a wide range of tasks.<n>This study examines middle school students ability to ask effective questions and critically evaluate ChatGPT responses.
• Score: 18.913112043551045
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT allow users, including school students without prior AI expertise, to explore and address a wide range of tasks. Surveys show that most students aged eleven and older already use these tools for school-related activities. However, little is known about how they actually use GenAI and how it impacts their learning. This study addresses this gap by examining middle school students ability to ask effective questions and critically evaluate ChatGPT responses, two essential skills for active learning and productive interactions with GenAI. 63 students aged 14 to 15 were tasked with solving science investigation problems using ChatGPT. We analyzed their interactions with the model, as well as their resulting learning outcomes. Findings show that students often over-relied on ChatGPT in both the question-asking and answer-evaluation phases. Many struggled to use clear questions aligned with task goals and had difficulty judging the quality of responses or knowing when to seek clarification. As a result, their learning performance remained moderate: their explanations of the scientific concepts tended to be vague, incomplete, or inaccurate, even after unrestricted use of ChatGPT. This pattern held even in domains where students reported strong prior knowledge. Furthermore, students self-reported understanding and use of ChatGPT were negatively associated with their ability to select effective questions and evaluate responses, suggesting misconceptions about the tool and its limitations. In contrast, higher metacognitive skills were positively linked to better QA-related skills. These findings underscore the need for educational interventions that promote AI literacy and foster question-asking strategies to support effective learning with GenAI.

Related papers

• How Novice Programmers Use and Experience ChatGPT when Solving Programming Exercises in an Introductory Course [0.0]
  This research paper contributes to the computing education research community's understanding of Generative AI (GenAI) in the context of introductory programming. This study is guided by the following research questions:. What do students report on their use pattern of ChatGPT in the context of introductory programming exercises? How do students perceive ChatGPT in the context of introductory programming exercises?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T12:55:42Z)
• Investigation of the effectiveness of applying ChatGPT in Dialogic Teaching Using Electroencephalography [6.34494999013996]
  Large language models (LLMs) possess the capability to interpret knowledge, answer questions, and consider context. This research recruited 34 undergraduate students as participants, who were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group engaged in dialogic teaching using ChatGPT, while the control group interacted with human teachers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T12:23:12Z)
• Exploring Parent's Needs for Children-Centered AI to Support Preschoolers' Interactive Storytelling and Reading Activities [52.828843153565984]
  AI-based storytelling and reading technologies are becoming increasingly ubiquitous in preschoolers' lives. This paper investigates how they function in practical storytelling and reading scenarios and, how parents, the most critical stakeholders, experience and perceive them. Our findings suggest that even though AI-based storytelling and reading technologies provide more immersive and engaging interaction, they still cannot meet parents' expectations due to a series of interactive and algorithmic challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:55:40Z)
• Can generative AI and ChatGPT outperform humans on cognitive-demanding problem-solving tasks in science? [1.1172147007388977]
  This study compared the performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on 2019 NAEP science assessments with students by cognitive demands of the items. Results showed that both ChatGPT and GPT-4 consistently outperformed most students who answered the NAEP science assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-07T12:36:31Z)
• Unreflected Acceptance -- Investigating the Negative Consequences of ChatGPT-Assisted Problem Solving in Physics Education [4.014729339820806]
  The impact of large language models (LLMs) on sensitive areas of everyday life, such as education, remains unclear. Our work focuses on higher physics education and examines problem solving strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T16:14:34Z)
• Covering Uncommon Ground: Gap-Focused Question Generation for Answer Assessment [75.59538732476346]
  We focus on the problem of generating such gap-focused questions (GFQs) automatically. We define the task, highlight key desired aspects of a good GFQ, and propose a model that satisfies these.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T22:21:42Z)
• Exploring User Perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, Perceptions, and Implications for AI-Integrated Education [40.38809129759498]
  ChatGPT is most commonly used in the domains of higher education, K-12 education, and practical skills training. On one hand, some users view it as a transformative tool capable of amplifying student self-efficacy and learning motivation. On the other hand, there is a degree of apprehension among concerned users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:13:14Z)
• ChatGPT is a Knowledgeable but Inexperienced Solver: An Investigation of Commonsense Problem in Large Language Models [49.52083248451775]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in NLP. We specifically focus on ChatGPT, a widely used and easily accessible LLM. We conduct a series of experiments on 11 datasets to evaluate ChatGPT's commonsense abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T03:05:43Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.